Sehwag1830 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 They should have done more to stop it if they could have. However, 1947/1948 was a much more volatile time and it may have been harder to prevent this from taking place. I did study a little on the partition of India and the violence associated with it when i was at Uni. I don't remember anything on Kashmir so would be happy to read any online source that explains exactly what happened in Kashmir in 1947/1948 and whether Nehru and Gandhi just stood and let it happen in the way i believe Modi did in Gujurat. The train burning at Godhra was a disgraceful act but that does not make what happened next excusable does it? Nehru was sleeping with Edwina while Hindus were being butchered. Nehru was a porn star and had a huge crush for white female . Nehru didn't do anything because he wanted to win Nobel peace prize and so he took Kashmir to UN . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surajmal Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Nehru was sleeping with Edwina while Hindus were being butchered. Nehru was a porn star and had a huge crush for white female . Nehru didn't do anything because he wanted to win Nobel peace prize and so he took Kashmir to UN . :haha: Be careful, otherwise Kapil Sibal will send CBI after you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 No . Because you and the other usual suspects here rarely speak about the scumbags that torched the train and a lot of them are still absconding. If you really are that impartial why don't you show some posts with similar anger directed towards those scumbags ? Infact Modi is responsible for failing to nab these scumbags ... when was the last time you did a similar song and dance about that aspect ? if those scumbags are caught and punished I'd be very happy. Same with Modi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surajmal Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 if those scumbags are caught and punished I'd be very happy. Same with Modi. Don't you think if there was some evidence of his complicity in the riots, he would have been arrested by now? The entire congress machinery has been after this man for the last 10 years but still nothing. Yet there are are countless people like yourself in this country that still believe he is guilty. What gives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sehwag1830 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Do Congress supporters know that Nehru had opposed construction of Somnath temple? He said building temples would make us another Pakistan(yep right ). Btw to secular people Somnath temple was broken 7 times by people of pissful community .Don't worry NCERT won't mention this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterix Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 I strongly believe that Sonia Gandhi is directly involved in the 1000s of Sikhs killed in Anti-Sikh riots.. She should be prosecuted and face the charges.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daryl1985 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 You speak as though you are in possession of evidence and such. Why didnt you go and depose infront of the Riot investigation commision that kept conducting open hearings for years ? Let me guess you have jack Sh!t in terms of evidence but a whole lot og agenda ... tell me something knew. Keep in mind that the Central Govt is being run by Kaangress for a long time now. Let me state the facts to you. 58 hindus were burned alive at Godhra. In the riots that followed, a further 196 Hindus were killed, 790 Muslims were killed (these were the figures given in the 1st official estimate), many were declared missing and a number of women were raped and subjected to horrifying sexual assaults. 7 years later it was estimated that 1267 people lost their lives as a result of the Gujurat violence with unofficial figures suggesting the figure could be as high as 2000. Having looked at those figures and having read several accounts of what went on in Gujurat i would want to know how the violence was allowed to escalate so badly after the burning of the train. I am not saying i have evidence to convict Modi but i would want a thorough, transparent and completely impartial investigation into why it took so long to stop the violence and whether anyone could have done more to stop it. If Modi and those working with him could have done more to prevent the situation from escalating then i believe they should be punished in some way as the loss of over 1000 Indian lives due to communal violence is not justifiable nor is it something that can be swept under the carpet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sehwag1830 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Modi has amazing ability. He polarizes even 2 hard core Sachin fans :--D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surajmal Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Modi has amazing ability. He polarizes even 2 hard core Sachin fans :--D Secular media has done its job well. I wonder how they will report on him, once he is in power... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterix Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 The violence in Delhi was triggered by the assassination of Indira Gandhi on 31 October 1984, by two of her Sikh bodyguards in response to her actions authorising the military operation. The Government of India reported 2,700 deaths in the ensuing chaos. In the aftermath of the pogrom, the Government of India reported 20,000 had fled the city, however the PUCL reported "at least" 50,000 displaced persons.[8] The most affected regions were the Sikh neighbourhoods in Delhi. Human rights organisations and newspapers across India believe the massacre was organised.[6][4][9] The collusion of political officials in the massacres and the Judiciary's failure to penalize the killers alienated normal Sikhs and increased support for the Khalistan movement.[10] The Akal Takht, the governing religious body of Sikhism, considers the killings to be a genocide.[11] In 2011, Human Rights Watch reported the Government of India had "yet to prosecute those responsible for the mass killings".[12] The 2011 WikiLeaks cable leaks revealed that the United States was convinced about the complicity of Indian Government ruled by the Indian National Congress in the pogrom, and termed it as "opportunism" and "hatred" of the Congress government against Sikhs.[13][14] Also in 2011, a new set of mass graves were discovered in Haryana, and Human Rights Watch reported that "Widespread anti-Sikh attacks in Haryana were part of broader revenge attacks" in India. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_anti-Sikh_riots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterix Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 :hysterical: @ the inference that even Supreme court is not able to conduct 'impartial investigation'.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sehwag1830 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 The funny thing is MMS is supposed to be honest despite multiple scams taking right under his nose.But Modi is guilty because he was CM of Gujarat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterix Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Yeah.. everybody else is 'impartial'.. MMS, Chidu mama, Madam, Sibbal, Raja, Sajjan, CBI, CVC.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sehwag1830 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Yeah.. everybody else is 'impartial'.. MMS, Chidu mama, Madam, Sibbal, Raja, Sajjan, CBI, CVC.. And the intellectuals on this forum have no problem if MMS becomes PM.:cantstop: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Laloo, Tytler etc. etc. are all innocent men - Indian courts have proved it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 the logic of some of the guys on ICF goes like this - X committed a crime and got away with it therefore if Y commits a crime then he/she should also not be punished because X has not been punished till date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sehwag1830 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 So why selectively point out that Modi has to be proved innocent by court for him to be PM while rest of the guys can contest for PM post because they are clean ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sehwag1830 Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 the logic of some of the guys on ICF goes like this - X committed a crime and got away with it therefore if Y commits a crime then he/she should also not be punished because X has not been punished till date. Yes this is called equality and this is how law works. Stop double standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Yes this is called equality and this is how law works. Stop double standards. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 So why selectively point out that Modi has to be proved innocent by court for him to be PM while rest of the guys can contest for PM post because they are clean ? I've never said that he has to be proved innocent for him to be PM. I have always maintained that he will polarize the anti BJP vote and won't be acceptable to many allies therefore he shouldn't be the PM candidate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts