Crookbond Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 After the iPhone, iPad and the iPod we have Ajmal's brand new company iDone Link to comment
panther Posted August 29, 2012 Author Share Posted August 29, 2012 i think we should wait for 2- 3 years .i have a gut feeling that ashwin will surprass ajmal.remember the geniuses of saqlain mushtaq and inzmam of 1992 world ccup were rated much higher than kumble and sachin,and we all know where all 4 of them finished. even today imran khan maintains that inzi is better batsman than tendu if he had more brains,if he had good shot selections,if he had more patience and more ifs:hysterical::hysterical: kumble only beats saqlian in quantity not quality. Link to comment
Lord Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 kumble only beats saqlian in quantity not quality. quality means playing for Pakistan?? Link to comment
Utalk Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 Ashwin will go on to become a very good bowler. Like his action but for now Ajmal is clear winner. Link to comment
maniac Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 Ajmal' date=' but purely for his interview skills[/quote'] Have you seen Ashwin's defensive skills in interviews...the guy will become a politician some day Link to comment
maniac Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 After the iPhone' date=' iPad and the iPod we have [b']Ajmal's brand new company iDone Might be a lawsuit waiting to happen...I am sure there is Idrone somewhere in Pak:giggle: Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 Ajmal' date=' but purely for his interview skills[/quote'] I second that:haha: Link to comment
Sarkar Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 Ashwin better batsman and bowler too. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 kumble only beats saqlian in quantity not quality. LOL.250 to 619.The vary comparision is void.Thats like comparing Courtney walsh to spot fixing Druggie Asif. Link to comment
deathmonger Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 kumble only beats saqlian in quantity not quality. lol that's like kambli vs miandad/yousuf/younis/inzi Link to comment
panther Posted August 29, 2012 Author Share Posted August 29, 2012 lol that's like kambli vs miandad/yousuf/younis/inzi lol kambli only played in 3 countries. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 lol kambli only played in 3 countries. And Saqlain took less than half the nos of wickets Kumble took.The very comparision is void.Compare Saqlain to someone with 250-300 wickets or 400 may be.Not with someone who has 600+ Link to comment
panther Posted August 29, 2012 Author Share Posted August 29, 2012 And Saqlain took less than half the nos of wickets Kumble took.The very comparision is void.Compare Saqlain to someone with 250-300 wickets or 400 may be.Not with someone who has 600+ than we should not compare half the worlds cricketer even greats like bradman to srt, dravid etc because they have far less runs. quality> quantity Link to comment
deathmonger Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 than we should not compare half the worlds cricketer even greats like bradman to srt, dravid etc because they have far less runs. quality> quantity then kambli comparison holds. and where is saqi>kumble in quality. kumble has better avg than saqi. but kambli has better avg than any paki batsman. Link to comment
panther Posted August 29, 2012 Author Share Posted August 29, 2012 saqi has better average against indians than warne and murli, go check kumbles average in pak. not to mention kumble has 200+ wickets in draws. Link to comment
deathmonger Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 saqi has better average against indians than warne and murli' date= go check kumbles average in pak. not to mention kumble has 200+ wickets in draws. LOL. what a crap criterion. MS Dhoni has better avg in PAk than Youhana in Ind. Dhoni>Youhana. And what is the draws stats. It's meaningless. And even if you delete the 200 wkts he still has 400+ which is still lot than saqi. Link to comment
panther Posted August 29, 2012 Author Share Posted August 29, 2012 LOL. what a crap criterion. MS Dhoni has better avg in PAk than Youhana in Ind. Dhoni>Youhana. And what is the draws stats. It's meaningless. And even if you delete the 200 wkts he still has 400+ which is still lot than saqi. indians are best players of spin Link to comment
deathmonger Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 indians are best players of spin pak have better bowlers. still dhoni has better avg than moyo. therefore dhoni>moyo. also using same criterion sehwag>ponting, sehwag>lara cause sehwag avgs 40+ in both wi and aus whereas ponting,lara avg in 20s in india. Link to comment
panther Posted August 29, 2012 Author Share Posted August 29, 2012 pak have better bowlers. still dhoni has better avg than moyo. therefore dhoni>moyo. also using same criterion sehwag>ponting, sehwag>lara cause sehwag avgs 40+ in both wi and aus whereas ponting,lara avg in 20s in india. saqi bowled to batsman like srt, dravid dhoni never had to face 2 ws and saqi. Link to comment
deathmonger Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 saqi bowled to batsman like srt, dravid dhoni never had to face 2 ws and saqi. dhoni faced akhtar,asif. moyo faced balaji,pre 2007 zak,ishant. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now