Who will you pick in your ODI team? [M. Clarke v Sarwan]

[Sidhoni]

__________________________________________________________________________ Michael Clarke vfwUHvQJxSU

VS

Ramnaresh Sarwan 0w81Ui26aQU __________________________________________________________________________ Stats comparison

[Lord]

lol fancy comparison threads now:hysterical:

[FischerTal]

what kind of joke is this?

[bulbul]

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

[bulbul]

his looks like a porn thread :((

[Sidhoni]

lol fancy comparison threads now:hysterical:

:D

what kind of joke is this?

?

[FischerTal]

:D ?

MC is the clear winner :hysterical::hysterical:

[Sidhoni]

MC is the clear winner :hysterical::hysterical:

Is he? Sarwan also played in a much weaker team than Clarke did. Stats are pretty much similar.

[FischerTal]

Is he? Sarwan also played in a much weaker team than Clarke did. Stats are pretty much similar.

Clarke doesnt play in a strong ODI team atm either but better stats.

[Sachin=GOD]

Clarke any day.

[SLICKR392]

Is he? Sarwan also played in a much weaker team than Clarke did. Stats are pretty much similar.

Doesn't make Sarwan a better player man. He has just had 1 - 2 good short period in ODIs and Clarke's played a lot more match winning knocks than Sarwan and hasn't really had a long bad patch in ODIs. Stats of Clarke is much superior. Don't go by averages in such situation. Trott's got an avg. over 50 but Clarke still ousts him as an ODI player. Clarke's SR was around 75, it has got better now and since the last 5-6 years Sarwan averages good but his SR is below 70.

[SLICKR392]

Clarke doesnt play in a strong ODI team atm either but better stats.

Yep, apart from Watson, Aus aren't that strong in their batting department.

[I6MTW]

MC BC.

[Sidhoni]

Doesn't make Sarwan a better player man. He has just had 1 - 2 good short period in ODIs and Clarke's played a lot more match winning knocks than Sarwan and hasn't really had a long bad patch in ODIs. Stats of Clarke is much superior. Don't go by averages in such situation. Trott's got an avg. over 50 but Clarke still ousts him as an ODI player. Clarke's SR was around 75, it has got better now and since the last 5-6 years Sarwan averages good but his SR is below 70.

I never said he was.

Yep' date=' apart from Watson, Aus aren't that strong in their batting department.[/quote'] That has been the case for past 2 years or so. Earlier they had all sorts of good players : Haydos, Gilly, Ponting you name it.

[Pagalpanti]

Stats make it look close but they're very far apart from each other. Sarwan is a 'good' player. Clarke has the potential to become a great. And if we bring in the test performances the gap just widens.

[Crookbond]

^ The pick was for an ODI team.

[maniac]

The most Random Comparison ever

[Muloghonto]

In ODIs, its a tough one but i will go with Sarwan because at his best, he was more effective against pacers. In tests, its a no contest. Sarwan is immensely talented but never quite had the work ethic. He is one of the few cricketers I've heard of who literally stopped playing cricket professionally because he partied too much and got fat. Clarke is a thorough pro who's done excellent stuff with a wonky back.