Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
nanda14792

ICF IPL GAME | Official Thread

ICF IPL GAME | Official Thread  

  1. 1.

    • yes
      1
    • no
      4


Recommended Posts

Nanda - in sheet 1 where the scores of all teams are there can you please add the value at which all the teams purchased each individual player. This will help us in deciding which players to discard in the transfer window and will also help in calculating how much money we can afford in the transfer window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question regarding the wild card - suppose I want to exchange player X in my team with AB DeVilliers but in the end due to high bidding price I cannot get ABDV so can I use the same wildcard to bid for another player (or for as many players if I keep losing in the bidding) in the SAME transfer window? Also, as long as I can fulfill my criteria of min/max number of players from each category, it doesn't matter whether I exchange a player from Star Players with a player from Overseas Magic/Home Performers, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a question regarding the wild card - suppose I want to exchange player X in my team with AB DeVilliers but in the end due to high bidding price I cannot get ABDV so can I use the same wildcard to bid for another player (or for as many players if I keep losing in the bidding) in the SAME transfer window?
I would think yes:nervous:
Also, as long as I can fulfill my criteria of min/max number of players from each category, it doesn't matter whether I exchange a player from Star Players with a player from Overseas Magic/Home Performers, right?
no nanda cleared that before.The exchange has to be from same category.The max/min criteria was for auctions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would think yes:nervous: no nanda cleared that before.The exchange has to be from same category.The max/min criteria was for auctions
I think it should be across categories as long as we can satisfy the min/max criteria - will ask Nanda and other teams for their opinion.
can't we tell tomorrow?
Yes. In fact, I think we can tell till before the start of the first match in gameweek 2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it should be across categories as long as we can satisfy the min/max criteria - will ask Nanda and other teams for their opinion.
I am against it honestly.the base price of two categories was different coz one had star players so one shouldnt be able to switch between categories imo Lets see what Nanda says.30markhan would agree with you coz he also is looking to do same:--D
es. In fact, I think we can tell till before the start of the first match in gameweek 2.
:two_thumbs_up:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am against it honestly.the base price of two categories was different coz one had star players so one shouldnt be able to switch between categories imo Lets see what Nanda says.30markhan would agree with you coz he also is looking to do same:--D :two_thumbs_up:
he has too much money remaining :whine: That money shouldn't be used otherwise all other teams would be at a disadvantage :whine:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

balances will be kept in tact during transfer and exchange windows since most of your players are not playing I think we shd revise the rule wherein you are required to maintain max 9 foreign players (becoz 6 home player is must) which can be 5fromstar+4frommagic or 5frommagic+4fromstar. I know there will be lot of whining over this but understand me its all for better. for eg no one thought that richardson wud play ahead of southee or pujara/saha will play ahead of vohra or marsh wudnot play at all. N since you have only one transfer to make over 15 days it might help from letting your mood go off for a player who doesnot configure in starting lineup. DO YOU LIKE THIS IDEA OF MAX 9 PLAYERS(4STARS+5MAGIC/4MAGIC+5STAR) PLEASE VOTE(ONE MEMBER PER TEAM SHALL VOTE)?????????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you suggesting exchanging overseas magician with Star performer nanda? If yes I'm vehemently against it.Those who took 5 star players in the team took the risk and paid much higher price for star players due to base prices being higher and it being the first category in auction.We shouldnt be penalised for that.The combo after auction should remain the same as for players not playing we can easily exchange them within category if we want too.. So call it whining or not,but my vote is no

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you suggesting exchanging overseas magician with Star performer nanda? If yes I'm vehemently against it.Those who took 5 star players in the team took the risk and paid much higher price for star players due to base prices being higher and it being the first category in auction.We shouldnt be penalised for that.The combo after auction should remain the same as for players not playing we can easily exchange them within category if we want too.. So call it whining or not,but my vote is no
ok lets see what others want to vote for???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think this rule is unfair BUT the problem is that it will favor only ONE team i.e. The Death Mongers. They have 3 Overseas Magic players, 7 Home performers and 5 Star Players so they can exchange one Home Performer for a Overseas Magic Player. All other teams have 5 star players, 5 overseas magic and 6 home - so for all other teams, they would have to remove a Star Player if they want to buy a Overseas Magic player while The Death Mongers can exchange a Home Performer for a Overseas Magic player - that will be advantageous for them. So I will be voting against this rule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think this rule is unfair BUT the problem is that it will favor only ONE team i.e. The Death Mongers. They have 3 Overseas Magic players' date=' 7 Home performers and 5 Star Players so they can exchange one Home Performer for a Overseas Magic Player. All other teams have 5 star players, 5 overseas magic and 6 home - so for all other teams, they would have to remove a Star Player if they want to buy a Overseas Magic player while The Death Mongers can exchange a Home Performer for a Overseas Magic player - that will be advantageous for them. So I will be voting against this rule.[/quote'] :icflove::two_thumbs_up:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I' date=' Lord and Forever India have voted NO so far.[/quote'] FI's vote understandable that he has picked players that wud generally play but Lord n SG putting up that it will benefit me that's why they are stoping it is marvalleous reason. Anyways my Home performers are better than your magic category like decock neesham hodge n marsh:giggle:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FI's vote understandable that he has picked players that wud generally play but Lord n SG putting up that it will benefit me that's why they are stoping it is marvalleous reason. Anyways my Home performers are better than your magic category like decock neesham hodge n marsh:giggle:
Its not a matter of what players I or Lord have. Its simply a matter of one team getting undue advantage - thats what I feel. Aur tumhari team ko harana toh hai hi :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So 3 out of 5 teams have voted NO. This means the rule can't be implemented.
:two_thumbs_up: Categorical substitution is what we have come to. Sorry Adi n Sid but your vote is uncalled for now. Please donot forget to post your team captains:icflove:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

Guest, sign in to access all features.

×