Bleed-Blue Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: who bought Siraj? SRH Link to comment
Forever Indian Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: who bought Siraj? SRH Link to comment
rkt.india Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 22 minutes ago, ShebbySB said: Navdeep may be a good prospect but I don't think he's a quick bowler. Ishant missing out is little baffling. Warrier also deserved to be picked by some team. He is quick enough. I have seen him bowl 135 plus up to 142 and he is tall, gets bounce. The guy who gave under 3 rpo against Aussie batsmen on that flat pitch must have something special about him. Mosher 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 6 minutes ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: who bought Siraj? SRH for 2.6 crores maniac 1 Link to comment
ShebbySB Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Just now, rkt.india said: He is quick enough. I have seen him bowl 135 plus up to 142 and he is tall, gets bounce. The guy who gave under 3 rpo against Aussie batsmen on that flat pitch must have something special about him. Ya bowled well in the A game....let's see how he bowls in this IPL. Link to comment
vishalvirsingh Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 On 18/02/2017 at 11:59 AM, rkt.india said: he could probably turnout to be the fastest uncapped bowler. Kamraan Khan.. .Where is he... Shane"s main bowler Link to comment
Cricketics Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, vishalvirsingh said: Kamraan Khan.. .Where is he... Shane"s main bowler His action was not considered clean enough. He got dropped and then it was hard for him to come back again. He came to bowl in MI Indians net ession last year but could not impress them or anyone else enough Link to comment
MCcricket Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 8 hours ago, Cricketics said: His action was not considered clean enough. He got dropped and then it was hard for him to come back again. He came to bowl in MI Indians net ession last year but could not impress them or anyone else enough Not entirely true, Kamran was called for chucking , his action was tweaked a bit n he for most part was good to begin with, had an elbow flexion hyperextension, he played domestics for SL as he was not picked up by U.P after his remedial work, reports from Lanka was he was bowling with good pace n bowled well there. Unfortunately he doesn't have a godfather n Warne ain't no more with Royals, he is bigger stronger n was called at Mi nets, but no reports of him not being impressive, also he played one or two T20 for U.P I believe in main age group or A squad earlier. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 I apalled why Kamran isn't playing Ranji trophy. He just played two games a few years back where he did okay. MCcricket 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 (edited) Watch Umar Nazir here, from the start. He is looking a bit quicker here than how he looked in SMA trophy. The batsman who is batting a decent batsman, Raqju Bhatkal has played for Karnataka . Beating him for pace and bounce. Edited February 21, 2017 by rkt.india Link to comment
express bowling Posted February 21, 2017 Author Share Posted February 21, 2017 16 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Watch Umar Nazir here, from the start. He is looking a bit quicker here than how he looked in SMA trophy. The batsman who is batting a decent batsman, Raqju Bhatkal has played for Karnataka . Beating him for pace and bounce. Maybe he was carrying a niggle in SMA Trophy Link to comment
rkt.india Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, MultiB48 said: not sure ,he is tall and can bowl 130-135 and at that pace it will bounce for him and if the ball straightens or nips back around off stump it can hurry batsman like bhatkal and it's a brand new ball,cant see the full carry to the keeper either yeah possibly Link to comment
Mosher Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 How is Natarajan's bowling? Is he really good with the yorkers? Any videos? Link to comment
Forever Indian Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 11 hours ago, Cricketics said: Haven't watched him a lot but here he is. He is definitely better than some of the o ther Indian seamers who play in Ranji. Not the best but pretty decent. @Mosher Here is a video of him from TNPL. He is supposed to be good at yorkers but did not get it right often enough in SMA trophy. Hope he is practicing them more. Mosher 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted February 21, 2017 Author Share Posted February 21, 2017 10 minutes ago, Mosher said: How is Natarajan's bowling? Is he really good with the yorkers? Any videos? Link to comment
Mosher Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 14 minutes ago, Forever Indian said: @Mosher Here is a video of him from TNPL. He is supposed to be good at yorkers but did not get it right often enough in SMA trophy. Hope he is practicing them more. 10 minutes ago, express bowling said: Thanks. express bowling 1 Link to comment
vishalvirsingh Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 33 minutes ago, Forever Indian said: @Mosher Here is a video of him from TNPL. He is supposed to be good at yorkers but did not get it right often enough in SMA trophy. Hope he is practicing them more. is he 140+.. does he bowl fast. he has good Yorkers and good control over his bowling. Link to comment
express bowling Posted February 21, 2017 Author Share Posted February 21, 2017 4 minutes ago, vishalvirsingh said: is he 140+.. does he bowl fast. No Link to comment
vishalvirsingh Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 17 minutes ago, express bowling said: No then long term prospects of natrajan are very less. batsman will be able to toy with his pace..and unless he is Super intelligent he would be proven Average. Yorkers are good but fast Yorkers are really challenging .. Yorkers at 133k can be taken full toss. I don't believe that he would make any impact. Ishant should have been picked.... Link to comment
Forever Indian Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 46 minutes ago, vishalvirsingh said: then long term prospects of natrajan are very less. batsman will be able to toy with his pace..and unless he is Super intelligent he would be proven Average. Yorkers are good but fast Yorkers are really challenging .. Yorkers at 133k can be taken full toss. I don't believe that he would make any impact. Ishant should have been picked.... Ishant has been crap throughout the IPL barring half a season. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now