GautiMaan Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 A ruling CM sent to jail.I am mighty impressed.:hatsoff::hatsoff::hatsoff: Ab kuch aur bhi bhejo... But she was doing some good work this term Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahaa Raavana Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 Evil biatch thrown into jail ...:yay: Wish her good pal karunanidi would also get convicted for his numerous crimes ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raghav_12 Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 can she get bail? She has legal remedies available with her in form of appeal to High Court and then to Supreme Court. So logically a person can't be asked to go through the punishment unless he/she exhausted all legal options or decides not to use available legal options. In this case, she would go to HC against this order. HC would admit appeal. She would ask for suspension of conviction pendency of appeal that would be grated and she would be given bail. In whole process she might have to be in jail for a month or may be more. If sentence was for 3 years or less she could have applied for bail in session level court itself. But in this case sentence is for 4 years so she'll have to go to High Court only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texan Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 These sort of convictions are a sham of the Indian judicial system. Laloo Prasad Yadav is walking free and conducting business as usual in his party despite a conviction. JJ will obtain a stay on the conviction and continue to walk free. First have a trial that lasts 20 - 30 years and then the convicted don't even need to serve any sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeautifulGame Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 Evil biatch thrown into jail ...:yay: Wish her good pal karunanidi would also get convicted for his numerous crimes ... Wait till Vaiko becomes CM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raghav_12 Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 These sort of convictions are a sham of the Indian judicial system. Laloo Prasad Yadav is walking free and conducting business as usual in his party despite a conviction. JJ will obtain a stay on the conviction and continue to walk free. First have a trial that lasts 20 - 30 years and then the convicted don't even need to serve any sentence. There wouldn't be any stay on the conviction. It will be only suspension of conviction in form of bail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Ramones Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 There wouldn't be any stay on the conviction. It will be only suspension of conviction in form of bail. Are you sure about that ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raghav_12 Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 Are you sure about that ? yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velu Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 I have read case was filed in 1997 by DMK official K Anbazhagan. Which version is true? i think Anbazhagan asked the SC to transfer the case from TN to karnataka.. have to appreciate Su Swamy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texan Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 There wouldn't be any stay on the conviction. It will be only suspension of conviction in form of bail. Just wait and see if she and Lalu actually end up serving their full sentences. I am highly skeptical, but would be elated if they do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 Can someone post a link to evidence presented in the case. I only see one related link googling for info, about some insignificant gifts given to Rahman in exchange for performing at a wedding free of charge. http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/gifts-to-rahman-among-evidence-against-jaya/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texan Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 Looks like Mr. Paneer Mutter is still Amma's leading candidate for the CM post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raghav_12 Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 There is a case of Disproportionate Assets against Mayawati too. any idea what is status of that case? and against Jagan too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raghav_12 Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 FIR filed against Karunanidhi, Stalin over DMK-AIADMK clash CHENNAI: The Chennai city police booked DMK chief M Karunanidhi and his son MK Stalin and 500 others on charges of attacking a group of AIADMK cadres near Gopalapuram on Saturday, immediately after a Bangalore court convicted party (AIADMK) supremo J Jayalalithaa in the disproportionate assets case. The Royapettah police booked cases under IPC sections 147 (punishment for rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with deadly weapon) 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means) 336 (act endangering life or personal safety of others) 506 (ii) (criminal intimidation) based on a complaint filed by two AIADMK cadres, Ilangovan and Ganesan, who came under attack. READ ALSO: Denied hospital stay, Jayalalithaa is now prisoner number 7402 READ ALSO: As it happened — Jayalalithaa assets case verdict Violence erupted in Chennai and other parts of the state after the Bangalore special court found Jayalalithaa guilty in the case. DMK members allegedly attacked a group of AIADMK cadres who tried to burn the effigy of M Karunanidhi and MK Stalin near their Gopalapuram residence. The AIADMK cadres were chased away by the DMK workers, who were armed with clubs. Police deployed for security pacified the agitators. This is stupidity and desperation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The-Ramones Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 yes Seems like you cannot have a suspended sentence unless you have completed 2 years into it. I think the only legal alternative now is for a stay by high court on this conviction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_B_ Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 so what does this mean for the bjp in tamil nadu? While nobody is expecting a win, can the BJP led rainbow alliance come second in the assembly elections? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 so what does this mean for the bjp in tamil nadu? While nobody is expecting a win, can the BJP led rainbow alliance come second in the assembly elections? B jP should have contested alone. That was a tactical blunder considering the vacuum we have now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 O Pannerselvam named as new CM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raghav_12 Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 Seems like you cannot have a suspended sentence unless you have completed 2 years into it. I think the only legal alternative now is for a stay by high court on this conviction. She is moving Bangalore high court tomorrow for bail which is nothing but an appeal to suspend the sentence until she has legal remedies available. Sentence becomes final only when either convict has accepted so or convict has exhausted all legal remedies. Stay on conviction is only a theoretical possibility which will not happen. Other option she has is filing an appeal against conviction which is more viable option. High court would definitely accept her appeal against conviction but benefit of that is limited until HC overturns the conviction and if it does so. Issue with that is pendency of appeal she would remain a convict and ban on her being an MLA would not be vacated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G_B_ Posted September 28, 2014 Share Posted September 28, 2014 B jP should have contested alone. That was a tactical blunder considering the vacuum we have now. you have to think long term. Who knows some outfits might even merge into the bjp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts