Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Gollum

By 2050, India to surpass Indonesia, will have largest Muslim population: Study

Recommended Posts

Point still stands that how exactly do we mix religion with cricket? If it's to do with our captains like Afridi and Inzi thanking God before their interview, then that is just how they speak normally.
Afridi doesn't thank god. He thanks "ma n-gger"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guyzzzz I went to Amreeki KKK phorum, bery bery hatephool. Then I goes to find akshtremisht somalia phorum, nooo such thing. So I iz concludes that Somalia iz a heaven for all while Amreeka izzz soooo intolerant :beee:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gs    5
Guyzzzz I went to Amreeki KKK phorum' date=' bery bery hatephool. Then I goes to find akshtremisht somalia phorum, nooo such thing. So I iz concludes that Somalia iz a heaven for all while Amreeka izzz soooo intolerant :beee:[/quote'] :giggle:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guyzzzz I went to Amreeki KKK phorum' date=' bery bery hatephool. Then I goes to find akshtremisht somalia phorum, nooo such thing. So I iz concludes that Somalia iz a heaven for all while Amreeka izzz soooo intolerant :beee:[/quote'] :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guyzzzz I went to Amreeki KKK phorum' date=' bery bery hatephool. Then I goes to find akshtremisht somalia phorum, nooo such thing. So I iz concludes that Somalia iz a heaven for all while Amreeka izzz soooo intolerant :beee:[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guyzzzz I went to Amreeki KKK phorum' date=' bery bery hatephool. Then I goes to find akshtremisht somalia phorum, nooo such thing. So I iz concludes that Somalia iz a heaven for all while Amreeka izzz soooo intolerant :beee:[/quote'] You've obviously ran out of things to say. Who was it talking about rats the other day? :giggle:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You've obviously ran out of things to say. Who was it talking about rats the other day? :giggle:
Good to see that my comment had the effect I wanted :two_thumbs_up:...It burnt the right target as I intended...makes me so happy :dance:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unlike most here, I think I qualify the sane criteria in your question. And I'm humble too, to boot. Muslims hated in India?? That would be odd when around 15%-18% of India is Muslim. And Indian Muslims aren't the masochist types, by and large. I don't know about the other Indian Muslims, but in my case its quite the opposite. I'd say there are clear levels of narcissism. I can only tell you this. My paternal grandparents migrated from what was the NWFP before the partition of India to Bombay (now Mumbai) for business purposes. And they were always of the opinion that coming to India was a good decision. I don't want to get onto the whole arguement of who is more tolerant etc etc. That has been done to death in this thread. But our constitution and our laws are definitely more tolerant. The concept of India, as a country for everyone who resides here is a lot more inclusive than the concept of Pakistan, which is primarily a country for Muslims of the subcontinent. :isalute:
top post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guyzzzz I went to Amreeki KKK phorum' date=' bery bery hatephool. Then I goes to find akshtremisht somalia phorum, nooo such thing. So I iz concludes that Somalia iz a heaven for all while Amreeka izzz soooo intolerant :beee:[/quote'] exactly :cantstop: this was what i was repeatedly saying to posters like guldozer that internet forums are not the microcosm of their respective countries

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bhai' date='why do you to want pakistan and bangladesh as a part of india again?[/quote'] I am OK with them as colonies with no free movement of people. They can pay us tax for protecting them and educating their population on modern living. We will also legally allow them to see Bollywood movies that they are so crazy about :agree:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am OK with them as colonies with no free movement of people. They can pay us tax for protecting them and educating their population on modern living. We will also legally allow them to see Bollywood movies that they are so crazy about :agree:
basically british raj part 2 or the king system :cantstop:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am OK with them as colonies with no free movement of people. They can pay us tax for protecting them and educating their population on modern living. We will also legally allow them to see Bollywood movies that they are so crazy about :agree:
:rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gs    5
I am OK with them as colonies with no free movement of people. They can pay us tax for protecting them and educating their population on modern living. We will also legally allow them to see Bollywood movies that they are so crazy about :agree:
:--D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am OK with them as colonies with no free movement of people. They can pay us tax for protecting them and educating their population on modern living. We will also legally allow them to see Bollywood movies that they are so crazy about :agree:
Right from the horses mouth. So you do implicitly admit that Telanganawood or whatever the Hyderabad film industry is called is secondary when it comes to projection of cultural power outside of India vis a vis Bollywood?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Right from the horses mouth. So you do implicitly admit that Telanganawood or whatever the Hyderabad film industry is called is secondary when it comes to projection of cultural power outside of India vis a vis Bollywood?
I stay in Hyderabad ( since many years I might add - on and off ) and ( hence) know Telugu. I am not a Gult or so called Telugu. However long association has fixed my loyalties. I still feel I speak better hindi than Telugu though. I fail to understand how you missed the common sense point that Pak/Ban cannot understand Telugu and how can any cultural power permeate without common language?. It is OK. On deeper thought, I know what your intention was :two_thumbs_up: I am used to this from you but frankly expected better from you as I respect your views on many issues. p.s. When we create Akhand Bharat, Telugu will also be encouraged across colonies . It is such a sweet language just like all Indian languages :dance:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Right from the horses mouth. So you do implicitly admit that Telanganawood or whatever the Hyderabad film industry is called is secondary when it comes to projection of cultural power outside of India vis a vis Bollywood?
Bengali,Mallu,Tamil,Kannada,Telegu,Bhojpuri,Odiya,Assamese,Punjabi,Haryanvi,Rajasthani,Gujrati, Goan, .... all these film industries make much better, more meaningful, deep, socially relevant movies in which people actually act. Bollywood makes the lousiest movies known to mankind fit for IQ<50 people....utter tripe. Only reason it is popular in neighboring SAARC countries is Hindi is somewhat easier to understand for them and because the actors/actresses are better looking, more detached from reality.... a source of inspiration for jobless, uneducated daydreamers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
..... I fail to understand how you missed the common sense point that Pak/Ban cannot understand Telugu and how can any cultural power permeate without common language?.
Come on now!! One doesn't need to know Telugu to marvel at ground breaking scenes of cinematic excellence like this: _O5VY2poUpM These movies transcend all linguistic boundaries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bengali,Mallu,Tamil,Kannada,Telegu,Bhojpuri,Odiya,Assamese,Punjabi,Haryanvi,Rajasthani,Gujrati, Goan, .... all these film industries make much better, more meaningful, deep, socially relevant movies in which people actually act. Bollywood makes the lousiest movies known to mankind fit for IQ The highlighted part is the truth actually. A psychologist would term the condition as chronic escapism. People who have harsh and/or financially difficult lives seek an 'escape from ground realities' in their modes of entertainment. It has nothing to do with IQ. The herd instinct in this case, pan India or even pan South Asia is escapism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Come on now!! One doesn't need to know Telugu to marvel at ground breaking scenes of cinematic excellence like this: _O5VY2poUpM These movies transcend all linguistic boundaries.
Good attempt - You know what I mean :winky: You will not believe the competition from Bollywood Mariyamjee. The below song had all nations in the world in a trance. Telugu songs and actors need to improve a lot to reach this level of sophistication/artistry and transcendental meditation :(( LYUBL4cWSO8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The highlighted part is the truth actually. A psychologist would term the condition as chronic escapism. People who have harsh and/or financially difficult lives seek an 'escape from ground realities' in their modes of entertainment. It has nothing to do with IQ. The herd instinct in this case, pan India or even pan South Asia is escapism.
Even people who don't have financial difficulties will watch over the top movies, SciFi movies, watch song and dance videos on YouTube, or even posting on internet etc. That can also be called escapism? The choice or the need to watch serious or 'realistic' movies is over rated IMHO. (I watch very few new movies these days. Simply because I don't feel like watching any movie)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Islam will becoming the biggest religion by the end of this century, in fact much sooner than that and you don't need statistics for it. The vast majority of these Muslims will be hard working and peaceful. The handful of idiots will be the concern.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gs    5
Islam will becoming the biggest religion by the end of this century, in fact much sooner than that and you don't need statistics for it. The vast majority of these Muslims will be hard working and peaceful. The handful of idiots will be the concern.
Since its poised to be the biggest, a "handful" could be a few millions if not more, and that is a serious concern. They cant be treated as the extremist "fringe" or a "minority". The peace loving ones need to reign them in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since its poised to be the biggest' date=' a "handful" could be a few millions if not more, and that is a serious concern. They cant be treated as the extremist "fringe" or a "minority". The peace loving ones need to reign them in.[/quote'] The handful will never be a few million. They are currently only a few thousand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The handful will never be a few million. They are currently only a few thousand.
Doesnt ISIS alone have like 30000 fighters?? Of course the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful folk, but at the same time I dont think its near as small as you claim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Doesnt ISIS alone have like 30000 fighters?? Of course the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful folk, but at the same time I dont think its near as small as you claim
30000 is a few thousand isn't it? And let's say you add Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram...it's nowhere near a million. And there are 1600 million Muslims in the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since its poised to be the biggest' date=' a "handful" could be a few millions if not more, and that is a serious concern. They cant be treated as the extremist "fringe" or a "minority". The peace loving ones need to reign them in.[/quote'] The peace loving ones havent been able to reign them in now, what makes you think they will when the situation gets out of hand?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A straight forward lumping is never very helpful. One has to look at individual countries/regions etc to analyze the situation better. There is always the peaceful majority, some liberal in thought and others conservative but they pose no danger to their land. What can be really troublesome is the fact about radicalization in Britain for instance, where the number of ISIS fighters is at times cited to be more than the British Muslims joining the armed forces. Among those ready to pick arms, there's probably more in that community ready to behead its social workers than to defend its citizens! The way I see it after a lot of thought because of the constant presence of terrorism in our daily news, there is some credit for the mainstream muslim who has taken a peaceful path despite there being some poisonous interpretations of Islam that are cited by the terror groups.

The handful will never be a few million. They are currently only a few thousand.
30000 is a few thousand isn't it? And let's say you add Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram...it's nowhere near a million. And there are 1600 million Muslims in the world.
Few thousand must be the count in Pakistan out of 200 million, right ? How'z that worked out for you ? This isn't criticizing Islam or muslims, but highlighting your hollow arguments on brushing away the problem in countries like Britian & Pakistan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Few thousand must be the count in Pakistan out of 200 million, right ? How'z that worked out for you ? This isn't criticizing Islam or muslims, but highlighting your hollow arguments on brushing away the problem in countries like Britian & Pakistan.
Even a few thousand are too many, I'm not denying that. But it annoys me when people start generalising especially when the terrorists are such a small minority. Didn't the KKK have 6 million members at one point? So why the generalisation only when it comes to Muslims?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even a few thousand are too many, I'm not denying that. But it annoys me when people start generalising especially when the terrorists are such a small minority. Didn't the KKK have 6 million members at one point? So why the generalisation only when it comes to Muslims?
Even non-extremists are much less tolerant on average. After all, the extremists come out of this lot only. (See pew polls on blasphemy, sharia etc. Then see comments of celebrated people like Umer Sharif)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even a few thousand are too many, I'm not denying that. But it annoys me when people start generalising especially when the terrorists are such a small minority. Didn't the KKK have 6 million members at one point? So why the generalisation only when it comes to Muslims?
Pakistan is Islamic Republic,which means majority of Pakis are communal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even a few thousand are too many, I'm not denying that. But it annoys me when people start generalising especially when the terrorists are such a small minority. Didn't the KKK have 6 million members at one point? So why the generalisation only when it comes to Muslims?
Again illusory correlation, its does not matter what KKK did or did not do, why are there few tens of thousands or millions of terrorists in Islam. Why is pakistan not secular republic of pakistan but islamic republic ? straight forward analysis and answers are needed. Dont try to refute the need to question, the question will exist even if you disagree with the need to raise it, but do tell us if you have or do not have an answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There we go. Its 70% officially. “Sunni extremists accounted for the greatest number of terrorist attacks and fatalities for the third consecutive year,” the report says. “More than 5,700 incidents were attributed to Sunni extremists, accounting for nearly 56 percent of all attacks and about 70 percent of all fatalities.” The report says that in 2011, a total of 10,283 terrorism attacks across the world killed 12,533 people. Terrorism also is blamed for 25,903 injuries and 5,554 kidnappings. According to NCTC, of the 12,533 terrorism-related deaths worldwide, 8,886 were perpetrated by “Sunni extremists,” 1,926 by “secular/political/anarchist” groups, 1,519 by “unknown” factions, 170 by a category described as “other”, and 77 by “Neo-Nazi/Fascist/White Supremacist” groups. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.nctc.gov/docs/2011_NCTC_Annual_Report_Final.pdf&date=2012-08-04

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

Guest, sign in to access all features.

×