Jump to content

Narsingh Yadav Banned for 4 years


Stuge

Recommended Posts

He is banned by CAS with immediate effect hence,he is not allowed to take part in Olympics anymore.

Utter shame on the part of wrestling federation of India to send him in rio.

He might be right ,but the fact is he is not allowed to participate.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, beautifulgame said:

You have to be seriously deluded to think such an excuse like sabotage will get him reprieve in a doping scandal.

Utter idiotic by the WFI. Only he failed doping test should have sent Sushil.Beyond pathetic

Seriously blaming sabotage the lamest excuse I can think off for a doping test lol

what if it actually happened? Might be lame for you but not for the wrestler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what if it actually happened? Might be lame for you but not for the wrestler.

Even if it was true , it still is a lame defence .No way would have CAS or Wada accepted that defence.

It would set a ridiculous precedence for WADA and every athlete would use the same lame evidence .WADA is bone headed organization .Just Google Sakho doping case to see how ridiculous lengths WADA goes to defend their doping tests .More so after the Russian controversy which made them look spectacularly in competent

WFI should never have accepted this defence even if this is true .They should have taken their time and built a decent defence for him and in the meantime let Sushil Kumar compete in the Olympics .

It was a stupid strategy and all that has achieved is put end to a decent medal Chance for India .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Narsingh took substance intentionally, in form of tablet, rules CAS

 

Quote

While handing down a four-year ban on Narsingh Yadav, the Court of Arbitration for Sports has ruled that the wrestler failed to produce any “real evidence” regarding the sabotage theory he had advanced and the balance of probabilities” was that he orally took the banned substance intentionally in tablet form on more than one occasion.

In its full award, the ad hoc panel of the CAS relied on expert evidence that Narsingh’s dope offence was not due to one-time ingestion of the prohibited substance and its concentration in the first test result (of June 25) was so high that it had to come from an oral ingestion of one or two tablets of methandienone, rather than from a drink where the powder had been mixed with water.

The expert opinion was given by Professor Christiane Ayotte from Canada who was presented by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Professor Ayotte is a member of IAAF Doping Commission since 1995 and was elected representative of the Heads of IOC Accredited Laboratories in 1995-1996. She is currently the Director of the WADA-accredited laboratory in Montreal.

Narsingh’s urine sample taken out-of competition on June 25 was found to contain metabolites of methandienone and long term metabolite of methandienone. Another sample taken out-of competition on July 5 was also found to contain long term metabolites of methandienone.

 

“...all in all found the sabotage (s) theory possible, but not probable and certainly not grounded in any real evidence. The panel therefore determined that the athlete had failed to satisfy his burden of proof and the panel was satisfied that the most likely explanation was that the athlete simply and intentionally ingested the prohibited substance in tablet form on more than one occasion,” the CAS panel said.  .......................

http://www.hindustantimes.com/olympics/narsingh-took-substance-intentionally-in-form-of-tablet-rules-cas/story-Ek8j0AGQc5hFgaHb9sFTjI.html

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...