Lannister Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 9 hours ago, BeautifulGame said: No this is stupid self harming jingoism Self harming? Are we getting any benefits from Pakistan otherwise? Let me tell you that they are a worthless as a country, no other country can possibly gain from them. Switchblade 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 hour ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: We can derecognise them and break all diplomatic relations and refuse to recognise a Pakistani passport.That is a right every govt. Possess. Why should Pakistanis be banned from ICF? No, it is called breaking diplomatic relations. That we can do. We did it with Rep. of South Africa during Apartheid years- it means we severed all diplomatic relations, including travel rights of citizens/passport-holders to the said nation. But we still recognized South Africa as a nation, since we already did that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Merlyn Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 No, it is called breaking diplomatic relations. That we can do. We did it with Rep. of South Africa during Apartheid years- it means we severed all diplomatic relations, including travel rights of citizens/passport-holders to the said nation. But we still recognized South Africa as a nation, since we already did that. No.Once you sever all diplomatic relations and declare that you dont recognise Pakistan as a state thats that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asim Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 hour ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: Why should Pakistanis be banned from ICF? So u have no issue with every other suggestion above? ;) Deucalion 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Merlyn Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 So u have no issue with every other suggestion above? ;) The OP has made his views known.Others are free to agree or disagree.India is a free country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asim Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 minute ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: The OP has made his views known.Others are free to agree or disagree.India is a free country. lol right Deucalion 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Merlyn Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 lol right You not agreeing makes no difference to Indians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 36 minutes ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: No.Once you sever all diplomatic relations and declare that you dont recognise Pakistan as a state thats that. I disagree. We cannot declare Pakistan as an unrecognized nation- that would be in violation of international law regarding previous govt. dictum. Stuff like alliances/deals etc. are always subject to breakage- but in terms of sovereignty, its not so easy. It creates trust issues in other facets of the government, since a government that will un-recognize another state, can basically, do anything. Or so the thinking goes. When we broke relations with RSA, we didnt stop recognizing them as a nation. That, we cannot go back on the word of our previous government- no respectable international government can, which is why even when Afghanistan gets invaded 10 ways to Sunday, nobody de-recognizes them. Only nations that have never recognized one another (for e.g.: the N & S Koreas) can effectively 'stall' but going back on recognized state, without fundamental demographic/geographic shift of that state (or that state failing to exist in the future), recognition that it is a state, is a pretty inviolable concept in international politics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Merlyn Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 I disagree. We cannot declare Pakistan as an unrecognized nation- that would be in violation of international law regarding previous govt. dictum. Stuff like alliances/deals etc. are always subject to breakage- but in terms of sovereignty, its not so easy. It creates trust issues in other facets of the government, since a government that will un-recognize another state, can basically, do anything. Or so the thinking goes. When we broke relations with RSA, we didnt stop recognizing them as a nation. That, we cannot go back on the word of our previous government- no respectable international government can, which is why even when Afghanistan gets invaded 10 ways to Sunday, nobody de-recognizes them. Only nations that have never recognized one another (for e.g.: the N & S Koreas) can effectively 'stall' but going back on recognized state, without fundamental demographic/geographic shift of that state (or that state failing to exist in the future), recognition that it is a state, is a pretty inviolable concept in international politics. When you dont recognise a nation all bilateral ties treaties etc etc all become void.It has nothing to do with other countries or multilateral issues. There is no issue with derecognising Pakistan.That doesnt effect Pakistans sovereignity. But the thing is that we havent even called back our high commisioner let alone do anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asim Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 1 hour ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: You not agreeing makes no difference to Indians. Yeah, whole world do not agree makes no diff to indians... Deucalion 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Merlyn Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 Yeah, whole world do not agree makes no diff to indians... Pakistan is not the whole world. And freedom of Indians in India is a matter of Indians no one else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 29 minutes ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: When you dont recognise a nation all bilateral ties treaties etc etc all become void.It has nothing to do with other countries or multilateral issues. There is no issue with derecognising Pakistan.That doesnt effect Pakistans sovereignity. But the thing is that we havent even called back our high commisioner let alone do anything else. It most definitely has multilateral implications, since de-recognizing a government is implicit for 'going back on your recognition word'. As i said, it simply is not done that way. When countries break total relations, they still recognize each other as countries, if they already have done so in the past. Only a survival failure for that country causes that country to be not recognized anymore. Just go check, when we broke relations with RSA, we still recognized RSA as a country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Merlyn Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 It most definitely has multilateral implications, since de-recognizing a government is implicit for 'going back on your recognition word'. As i said, it simply is not done that way. When countries break total relations, they still recognize each other as countries, if they already have done so in the past. Only a survival failure for that country causes that country to be not recognized anymore. Just go check, when we broke relations with RSA, we still recognized RSA as a country. The matter of recognition and territorial integrity is mutual and cannot be msintained if the other side violates it.Also India has never recognised POK as part of Pakistan.So there are lot of grounds for India to not recognise pakistan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyboardWarrior Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 pehlay Aloo payaz tu band kar lo Wagah border say. Deucalion 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 Do not purchase any pakistani goods. There are lots of masalas,basmati rice that comes from pak these days and i see them even in Indian stores, brandishing themselves as Indian masala, boycott them, unless you want to sponsor terror. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 5 minutes ago, KeyboardWarrior said: pehlay Aloo payaz tu band kar lo Wagah border say. first we will stop the Indus river then we come to wagah border. no more 19 % we take 80% of Indus water from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laaloo Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 I have been saying that for year. Ye log toh nahi sudhrenge. Boycott everything. Tired of this shit. These guys and their Aman ki Asha BS and then kill our Jawans. Vilander 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 It is Ind water that allows for a large quantity of food to be grown in Pak. If no food is grown, what will come through the Wagah border? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyboardWarrior Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 10 hours ago, Vilander said: first we will stop the Indus river then we come to wagah border. no more 19 % we take 80% of Indus water from now on. go ahead sir ji. no one can stop suppa pawaa. Adi_91 and Deucalion 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted September 19, 2016 Share Posted September 19, 2016 Just layoff anything pakistani as individuals. Do not use them, products either realworld or service never again anything pakistani. 2 minutes ago, KeyboardWarrior said: go ahead sir ji. no one can stop suppa pawaa. yup the powers to be have a plan boss no one can stop them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts