tweaker Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 BCCI president Anurag Thakur and secretary Ajay Shirke have been removed from their posts by the Supreme Court of India at a hearing in Delhi on Monday morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweaker Posted January 2, 2017 Author Share Posted January 2, 2017 In a historic verdict, a seven-judge panel of the Supreme Court ruled that politicians who use religion, caste, creed or language to gain votes will be immediately disqualified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zubinpepsi Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 except the national anthem in cinemas i agree with all other rulings from SC tweaker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trichromatic Posted January 2, 2017 Share Posted January 2, 2017 1 hour ago, tweaker said: In a historic verdict, a seven-judge panel of the Supreme Court ruled that politicians who use religion, caste, creed or language to gain votes will be immediately disqualified. How does that work? Would a candidate saying that he will work for lifting for a particular community will be disqualified? tweaker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweaker Posted January 12, 2017 Author Share Posted January 12, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandeep Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 On 12/16/2016 at 4:57 AM, tweaker said: A Hindu son can divorce his wife for the cruelty of trying to pry him away from his “pious obligation” to live with his aged parents and provide shelter to them, the Supreme Court has held. A woman becomes a part of the husband’s family and cannot seek to separate him from his parents for the sole reason that she wants to entirely enjoy his income, a Bench of Justices Anil R. Dave and L. Nageshwara Rao observed in a judgment. I have personally gone through this. Although not in India. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 17 hours ago, sandeep said: I have personally gone through this. Although not in India. Sorry to hear that. No person should go through that, to choose between the parents and the spouse. tweaker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Supreme Court rejects Jallikattu plea for early order, protests erupt in Tamil Nadu A leading Jallikattu organiser told The Indian Express that they have decided to organise the sport this year even if it meant going against the apex court ruling. Kamalhassan has asked to ban Biriyani as well if SPCA/Peta is against this tradition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Merlyn Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Supreme Court rejects Jallikattu plea for early order, protests erupt in Tamil Nadu A leading Jallikattu organiser told The Indian Express that they have decided to organise the sport this year even if it meant going against the apex court ruling. Kamalhassan has asked to ban Biriyani as well if SPCA/Peta is against this tradition. Enough of these bans from SC.Ban Dahi Handi.Ban Firecrackers.Ban Jallikattu.But Bakr id and self mutiliation during Muharram is fine. tweaker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StriKe Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 (edited) Ban leather goods too .. PETA Edited January 13, 2017 by StriKe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweaker Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweaker Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 The Supreme Court held on Tuesday that stray dogs too have a right to live and said these could be eliminated only if they became a menace to the society. A bench of Justices Dipak Misra and R Banumathi dismissed a plea that all stray dogs should be killed in view rising cases of dog bites over the years, even causing death of people. The bench called for a balanced approach on the issue. It said compassion should be shown towards stray dogs but at the same time, these animals could not be allowed to become a menace to the society. The court was hearing a bunch of pleas filed by animal rights activists as well as a group of people seeking culling of stray dogs. The activists have challenged the order passed by various civic bodies for culling of stray dogs in Kerala and Mumbai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandeep Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 WTF. This supreme court is quickly turning into those old has-been out of touch uncles who have nothing better to do but to talk trash and issue orders. Unfortunately these uncles' words carry weight. In a system of checks and balances, what is the mechanism of keeping the judiciary in check? If the appointees are for life, by definition, these guys should be forward-thinking but conservative in their decisions - can't be going bonkers over things like Cricket administration and stray dogs. cowboysfan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweaker Posted February 14, 2017 Author Share Posted February 14, 2017 The Supreme Court today clarified that the audience need not stand when the National Anthem is played as a part of the storyline of a film, newsreel or documentary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweaker Posted February 14, 2017 Author Share Posted February 14, 2017 VK Sasikala was today found guilty of corruption by the Supreme Court and has been sentenced to four years in prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetle Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 5 hours ago, tweaker said: The Supreme Court today clarified that the audience need not stand when the National Anthem is played as a part of the storyline of a film, newsreel or documentary. SC has become a drama house.Don't they have better and more serious issues at hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweaker Posted February 15, 2017 Author Share Posted February 15, 2017 The Supreme Court (SC) has cancelled the degrees of 634 doctors. It has also cancelled the admissions of over 300 medical students. The doctors and students involved are related to the infamous Vyapam scam. BeautifulGame 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweaker Posted February 15, 2017 Author Share Posted February 15, 2017 The Supreme Court (SC) in a recent order declared that a man does not have the right to claim the property inherited by his sister from her husband. This is because the brother can neither be considered to be her heir nor her family. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tweaker Posted February 22, 2017 Author Share Posted February 22, 2017 Supreme Court came ruled on Tuesday that flat owners could join hands to directly approach the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) against builders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetle Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/terrorists-killing-innocents-should-forget-family-ties-says-supreme-court/articleshow/57258969.cms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts