Jump to content

Pakistan Discussion Thread


KeyboardWarrior

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Muloghonto said:

4. We've had separatist movement in Quebec and it still exists, Quebecois did extended rally and protest to separate from Canada but at no point did the army have the mandate to open fire or maim Canadian citizens.

 

Quick comment on the above point. That comparison is not apples to apples. Kashmir issue has been fueled by Pak which illegally occupying POK and using proxies to destabilize Ind through Kashmir 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, rett said:

Pak posters have somehow found a way to compare Pak with Ind. It is like comparing a bed and breakfast lodge (Pak) with a 4 star hotel (Ind) :facepalm:.... When will Pak learn not to compare itself with Ind or any other civilized country 

 

Where are they doing it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/26/2016 at 8:23 AM, velu said:

If Olympic committee brings border infiltration as a game, both padosi nation will win gold n silver.

Even when it comes to unsuccessful doping and fixing attempts, our padosi to the North West will win Gold hands down. No competition whatsoever :bow:

 

They can just send nominations, like Yasir Shah, Amir, etc, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link

 

For a change, something good to read from Pak. Good to know that Karachi was bustling till the 70s. 70s and earlier pics could be reminiscent of many other cities in the sub con. The chronicles probably also show how Pak changed negatively over the years.

 

Samples:

 

579b0ea7b4ace.jpg

 

^1860

 

 

579b06a250616.jpg

 

^ 1919

 

 

579b0224e7bf2.jpg

 

^ 1962

 

 

Edited by rett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rett said:

Not sure if that is accurate if you mean individuals in every province would be voting on it. A province in Canada can go for a referendum to get independence. If the majority in the province answer "yes", the province would then have to negotiate with the central government  .... Here is the Canadian Clarity Act -> LINK

 

Until there is "clarity" on this issue, QC example could be considered as irrelevant to this topic

 

 

 

 

The way the Quebec referendum went down, any Canadian could vote on it...in Quebec. The number of Ontarians who simply drove to Quebec to vote was pretty huge.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below is what is stated about a qualified elector:

 

"Qualified electors

According to the Québec Election Act, mentioned above, in order to be able to vote in a referendum in Québec, one has to be a qualified elector. The act applies age (18 years) and Canadian citizenship requirements.

To be a qualified elector, one must also have been domiciled in Québec for six months."

 

25 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

The way the Quebec referendum went down, any Canadian could vote on it...in Quebec. The number of Ontarians who simply drove to Quebec to vote was pretty huge.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, rett said:

US dossier bares Pakistan's Pathankot role

 

"HIGHLIGHTS

  • The US has handed over 1,000 pages of chats and conversations between Jaish-e-Muhammed handler and Jihadis.
  • The four fidayeen of JeM were in regular touch with their handlers in Pakistan during the 80-hour attack."

 

Will be interesting to see what action Ind takes :orderorder:

 

 

India will put pressure to act on terrorist Maulana Masood Azhar and Pakistan will do nothing about it. This has been the trend across the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, rett said:

Below is what is stated about a qualified elector:

 

"Qualified electors

According to the Québec Election Act, mentioned above, in order to be able to vote in a referendum in Québec, one has to be a qualified elector. The act applies age (18 years) and Canadian citizenship requirements.

To be a qualified elector, one must also have been domiciled in Québec for six months."

 

 

Yes, it meant you must've lived in Quebec (notice, 'domiciled' is a past tense). These are 'window dressing statements' for the consumption of the Quebec nationalists. in reality, in the western world, a lot more people move around and in Canadian context, the # of people who've lived in Quebec for some time or another, is pretty high- many times the population of Quebec itself.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Yes, it meant you must've lived in Quebec (notice, 'domiciled' is a past tense). These are 'window dressing statements' for the consumption of the Quebec nationalists. in reality, in the western world, a lot more people move around and in Canadian context, the # of people who've lived in Quebec for some time or another, is pretty high- many times the population of Quebec itself.

 

That would make sense. Since many people do tend move around, it is not necessary that someone from QC to be residing in QC at the time of the referendum. And alternatively, the law can also be used by those Canadians who resided in QC for 6-months or more. Which is why you found many Ontarian driving to QC 

 

Btw, I live in ON :p:

Edited by rett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before we declare Pakistan as an enemy state, we must atleast, completely and totally close any land, air or sea travel directly between India and Pakistan. Full stop, total zero. 
If Pakistanis and Indians need to visit the opposing nations, go through a third party nation, like fly in and out through Dubai or something. 

 

Declaring someone to be one's enemy, without taking the proper protective measures first, is just stupid.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Finer said:

Karachi would have been modern by now if it wasn't for foreign-funded MQM that destroyed Karachi and any hope of Karachi becoming modern city. Cleansing against MQM just got started, so the stability in Karachi should prevail in time. Whereas Punjab [Islamabad, Lahore and many more] and Azad Kashmir have grown beautifully, naturally and economically.

foreign funded gotta love you folk's conspiracy. Why would karachi residents vote for a foreign funded party ? you have your ISI and army who have complete control whole of pakistan and yet were they sleeping all these years but started to clean up now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Finer said:

Whereas Punjab [Islamabad, Lahore and many more] and Azad Kashmir have grown beautifully, naturally and economically.

Do you have numbers to back your comment? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Before we declare Pakistan as an enemy state, we must atleast, completely and totally close any land, air or sea travel directly between India and Pakistan. Full stop, total zero. 
If Pakistanis and Indians need to visit the opposing nations, go through a third party nation, like fly in and out through Dubai or something. 

 

Declaring someone to be one's enemy, without taking the proper protective measures first, is just stupid.

 

Discussed it in post #10 .... IMO, there is no first or 2nd here as a declaration is not merely symbolic.  All steps can be taken in tandem

 

By declaring Pak an enemy, it gives Ind the authority to impose restrictions w/o having to justify and/or go through a long internal process

 

Edited by rett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Garuda said:

No the cause of the terrorism and violence goes all the way back to the idea of Pakistani identity itself. Their whole country is based on the fake identity created by anti-India and anti-Hindu rhetoric. Whenever a politician or army chief is in trouble, he invokes India and the people get behind him forgiving and forgetting all the looting he has done. If the people are still adamant, they start cross border firing and when INdia retaliates, they go "See we told you but you didn't believe. These Indians (by that they mean Hindus) are evil people out to get you. You didn't listen and we lost so much life because we were restrained by you. Otherwise we would have kicked their cowardly butts". Reality is in a full-scale war, India will tear Pakistan into pieces like a lion tears into a hyena. They are the real cowards avoiding a full scale war and promote jiihadis.

Whatever crap they do, their country is destined to be doomed. As I mentioned before, it is a nothing country with average standard of living, no big economy.

 

The more they keep building the army to send mercenaries across the border, the more their end is near.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Garuda said:

I don't care how their country ends up. But seeing as they are full of hate and possess nukes, I wouldn't put it past them to try to take us with them. We should be confident but vigilant.

What worries me is the patronage that they are openly giving for global terrorism. They are not just our enemies, but a global enemy in my opinion. I don't know how that country is running without any major investment going on. Also, there are security concerns, but they don't care as they are more than happy funding the likes of Hafiz Saeed and other murderers to carry out terrorism in Indian soil.

 

Only a shameless country like China can side with a nation certified to be the global epicenter of terrorism. I am sure even that is going to hurt Pakistan in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Garuda said:

They are still getting a lot of aid from US. Chinese money is obvious but China will suck Pak dry the padosis will wake up one day with nothing in hand and they think CHina is their best friend forever :giggle:. Saudi Arabia is sending all the funds to promote wahabbism, deobandism, and other radical outfits. Also the west is not exactly innocent either. They profit bigtime from islamic terror as they have a bad guy they can point to whilst swindling the world. So despite their whining about Pakistan, they will keep aiding it as long as India doesn't assert itself in diplomacy with the West. 

I know. All the photo-ops have nothing in it in terms of substance. If not, then Pakistan would have long punished for its misdeeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...