Vilander Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 19 hours ago, MultiB48 said: http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/story/750861.html 357 off 869 =41%, so contributing 72-68% of the revenue and getting back 41% , so losing around 41% of ind share. 90% of ICF was against Srinivasan, still is so i guess it serves you right. let me get it he wanted Indias share to be 507 mil and Manohar made it 290. If the money is spent on development territories i can accept, why the f should India bank roll pakistan,zim and BD boss? lol we hardly play them. Now they will get Indian money. This has to reach the parliament, if SC and the piece of crap BCCI do not have the balls to protect Indian interests then someone who can should be asked to. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 10 minutes ago, Vilander said: 90% of ICF was against Srinivasan, still is so i guess it serves you right. let me get it he wanted Indias share to be 507 mil and Manohar made it 290. If the money is spent on development territories i can accept, why the f should India bank roll pakistan,zim and BD boss? lol we hardly play them. Now they will get Indian money. This has to reach the parliament, if SC and the piece of crap BCCI do not have the balls to protect Indian interests then someone who can should be asked to. I want Srini Mama Back. Link to comment
sandeep Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 14 minutes ago, MultiB48 said: and not to forget a free piggy ride to the like of aus and eng if not bankrolling them as well,truly we are a land of great souls This is my biggest issue. I don't mind Indian money being shared with Ireland, Afghanistan, associate members, even Zim, SL, Bang - heck even greenbros to a certain extent. But why England and Australia get to feed at the trough? This is a sham. Vilander 1 Link to comment
mishra Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Get both Mama and Lalit Modi. One will deal with ICC and one will deal with IPL Ironhide and Vilander 2 Link to comment
mishra Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 13 minutes ago, MultiB48 said: got to say this supreme court affair and the icc timings look too well coordinated to be coincidental,media too has presented a biased opinion ,all in all pretty well played. Exactly. Also that IPL game/venue cancellations and all at behest of court. This bit is messier than Srini or Lalit Link to comment
Vilander Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 49 minutes ago, sandeep said: This is my biggest issue. I don't mind Indian money being shared with Ireland, Afghanistan, associate members, even Zim, SL, Bang - heck even greenbros to a certain extent. But why England and Australia get to feed at the trough? This is a sham. Eng infuriates me too, 2017 2019 icc events and a bigger share of revenues...they hardly lost anything. Link to comment
Vilander Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 12 minutes ago, mishra said: Get both Mama and Lalit Modi. One will deal with ICC and one will deal with IPL Fire with Fire..they should come back and show how bad India can be when it wants to. Link to comment
Vilander Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 1 hour ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: I want Srini Mama Back. i guess we have the SC to thank for that, they have gone ape **** on Srini and his gang. They wont be back unfortunately, SC in all its might and wisdom did not care to see that is is not serving Indian interests. The only way is some politician takes interest in this and it somehow gets mentioned in parliament, and they decide to have a go at SC and BCCI can get back to normal and take on ICC. Basically we are screwed. Link to comment
mishra Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Vilander said: Fire with Fire..they should come back and show how bad India can be when it wants to. Exactly! Respecting Court, hire as independent Consultants. But must hire both Edited February 9, 2017 by mishra Link to comment
Vilander Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Just now, mishra said: Exactly! Respecting Court, hire as independent Consultants. I dont think anyone will have balls to do that though, with the SC pissed off as it is. Link to comment
mishra Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 11 minutes ago, Vilander said: I dont think anyone will have balls to do that though, with the SC pissed off as it is. If it is explained to people, On news channels, Supreme Court wont have balls to oppose any further. Link to comment
Vilander Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, mishra said: If it is explained to people, On news channels, Supreme Court wont have balls to oppose any further. takes time to galvanize opinion, and takes very charismatic leadership, with BCCI and its SC anointed morally scrupulous sadhus at helm i guess it wont be happening any time soon unfortunately. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Media has to be used here to form an opinion againist ICC. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 icc is too big and will gang up ,isolate ecb and need to ruin them Gangup?LOL.They will come on their knees if Indian sponsord withdraw. Link to comment
mishra Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 47 minutes ago, Vilander said: takes time to galvanize opinion, and takes very charismatic leadership, with BCCI and its SC anointed morally scrupulous sadhus at helm i guess it wont be happening any time soon unfortunately. Kind of agree here.All it needs is agree couple of bilateral series against small nations. Some money via IPL auctions and they will change their vote. But I guess it is not going to happen as these guys have neither experience, nor knowledge nor guts nor capability. They are tools to politics. How can one expect them to play politics Link to comment
Vilander Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Just now, mishra said: Kind of agree here.All it needs is agree couple of bilateral series against small nations. Some money via IPL auctions and they will change their vote. But I guess it is not going to happen as these guys have neither experience, nor knowledge nor guts nor capability. They are tools to politics. How can one expect them to play politics I know, the 7 votes..lol all except Pak,SA and Eng should have been against it. it would have been easy even to take CSA to the side and fix them. Link to comment
mishra Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 4 minutes ago, Vilander said: I know, the 7 votes..lol all except Pak,SA and Eng should have been against it. it would have been easy even to take CSA to the side and fix them. BCCI should come up with a new proposal which pays more to 3 and nothing to rest. That should fix them. And offcourse immediate with drawl from Cahmpions trophy and then no biannual t20 world cup. Link to comment
mishra Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Simply walk off Champions Trophy. let ICC earn those billions. Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 You guys more hungry for bcci making money then your own bank balance lol we will be too dogs with best of everything . The panic and anger here is bizzare A bit more for poorer nations for good of cricket and development is good thing ? Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 5 minutes ago, mishra said: Simply walk off Champions Trophy. let ICC earn those billions. And do you as fan gain from this ? i want to see india play . Not admire bcci bank balance having a few more rupees in it Lord 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now