Jump to content

Is this worst Indian batting line up against spin in last 40 years?


Recommended Posts

Instances when Indian team lost 20 wickets in less than 800 balls at home

 

Match totals
India 212 20 444 10.60 2.86 lost   v Australia Pune 23 Feb 2017 investigate this query
India 309 20 659 15.45 2.81 won   v Australia Mumbai 3 Nov 2004 investigate this query
India 278 20 671 13.90 2.48 lost   v West Indies Kolkata 31 Dec 1958 investigate this query
India 454 20 682 22.70 3.99 draw   v West Indies Mumbai 11 Dec 1987 investigate this query
India 404 20 686 20.20 3.53 lost   v South Africa Ahmedabad 3 Apr 2008 investigate this query
India 331 20 706 16.55 2.81 lost   v West Indies Kolkata 10 Dec 1983 investigate this query
India 371 20 709 18.55 3.13 lost   v West Indies Kanpur 21 Oct 1983 investigate this query
India 391 20 732 19.55 3.20 lost   v England Mumbai 15 Feb 1980 investigate this query
India 388 20 749 19.40 3.10 won   v South Africa Nagpur 25 Nov 2015 investigate this query
India 379 20 753 18.95 3.01 lost   v New Zealand Mumbai 24 Nov 1988 investigate this query
India 344 20 768 17.20 2.68 lost   v West Indies Ahmedabad 12 Nov 1983 investigate this query
India 278 20 772 13.90 2.16 lost   v England Kanpur 12 Jan 1952 investigate this query
India 338 20 778 16.90 2.60 lost   v South Africa Mumbai 24 Feb 2000 investigate this query
India 288 20 790 14.40 2.18 lost   v Pakistan Lucknow 23 Oct 1952 investigate this query

When Indian team scored less than 350 for 20 wickets at home

 

India 212 20 444 10.60 2.86 lost   v Australia Pune 23 Feb 2017 investigate this query
India 272 20 886 13.60 1.84 lost   v Australia Kolkata 2 Nov 1956 investigate this query
India 278 20 772 13.90 2.16 lost   v England Kanpur 12 Jan 1952 investigate this query
India 278 20 671 13.90 2.48 lost   v West Indies Kolkata 31 Dec 1958 investigate this query
India 287 20 1093 14.35 1.57 lost   v Australia Chennai 13 Jan 1960 investigate this query
India 288 20 790 14.40 2.18 lost   v Pakistan Lucknow 23 Oct 1952 investigate this query
India 309 20 659 15.45 2.81 won   v Australia Mumbai 3 Nov 2004 investigate this query
India 314 20 980 15.70 1.92 lost   v Australia Chennai 19 Oct 1956 investigate this query
India 331 20 706 16.55 2.81 lost   v West Indies Kolkata 10 Dec 1983 investigate this query
India 336 20 875 16.80 2.30 lost   v England Kolkata 1 Jan 1977 investigate this query
India 338 20 778 16.90 2.60 lost   v South Africa Mumbai 24 Feb 2000 investigate this query
India 341 20 1024 17.05 1.99 lost   v Australia Delhi 12 Dec 1959 investigate this query
India 344 20 768 17.20 2.68 lost   v West Indies Ahmedabad 12 Nov 1983 investigate this query
India 345 20 981 17.25 2.11 lost   v West Indies Kolkata 31 Dec 1966 investigate this query
India 349 20 947 17.45 2.21 lost   v Pakistan Bangalore 13 Mar 1987 investigate this query
Link to comment

Yes....No excuse in giving wickets to Moeen Ali, Adil Rashid and now O'keefe.

 

rolled over by Santner and Sodhi in the Wt20.

 

sure in the past likes of Clarke or that English spinner had that odd success but we fold to any spinner these days.

Edited by maniac
Link to comment

To some degree, it is difficult to measure in terms of apples to apples over a 40 year period as the factors below could have a certain amount of influence:

 

  • More exposure to Indian conditions, relatively 
  • Visiting teams playing more spinners, including part timers, in their 11 
  • Formats such as T20 having an impact on batting in tests 
  • DRS

 

Going back to 2000s, Aus played quality spinners such as Warne, McGill, etc., so comparing Ind line up in 2000s vs the present one, this one has some work to do 

 

One has to remember that visiting teams winning a test or two against the stronger home team is not rare. When touring OZ in the mid 90s to mid 00s, when OZ was a beast, Eng managed to win a test here and there too 

 

 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
To some degree, it is difficult to measure in terms of apples to apples over a 40 year period as the factors below could have a certain amount of influence:

 

  • More exposure to Indian conditions, relatively 
  • Visiting teams playing more spinners, including part timers, in their 11 
  • Formats such as T20 having an impact on batting in tests 
  • DRS
 

Going back to 2000s, Aus played quality spinners such as Warne, McGill, etc., so comparing Ind line up in 2000s vs the present one, this one has some work to do 

 

One has to remember that visiting teams winning a test or two against the stronger home team is not rare. When touring OZ in the mid 90s to mid 00s, when OZ was a beast, Eng managed to win a test here and there too 

 

 

 

England mostly won when the series was already over na dit was dead rubbers .

 

Also here the extent of defeat.We didn't make 200+ two innings combined .That's just staggering.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, BeautifulGame said:

 

England mostly won when the series was already over na dit was dead rubbers .

 

Also here the extent of defeat.We didn't make 200+ two innings combined .That's just staggering.

 

True, but since Ind hasn't lost in a while (from what I recall as I haven't been following cricket much lately), may be the law of averages caught up with the team 

 

Moving forward, Ind has to forgot about this test and treat the series as a 3 test one .... In fact, it will be interesting to see IF and HOW the team bounces back! 

Link to comment
Just now, Lord said:

You are saying our batting against spin is no concern?

Not really . Against England slaughtered their spinner 

 

this track has risdublus turn. Last time we played on crazy turner was when Michal Clarke got 6-9 (something like that ) against possibly greatest batting line up this planet has seen v spin. 

 

When we get on normal spinning tracks (like for rest of series ) we will see who is weak against spin 

 

this track was not a turning track it was bonkers lol you will see this o keefe being brought to his knees from now on 

Link to comment

How do your statistics prove they are bad against spin in 40 years ? Do you have anything to back up your claims or you just thought 'Heck I'm bored, let me just make up whatever comes to my damn mind and create a thread. And there are others here stupid enough to agree with you. :rofl: 

 

Last 20 tests they went without a loss, won 17 of them and most of them were at home on turning tracks. Yeah, I think you may be a bit wrong there.

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, King Tendulkar said:

Not really . Against England slaughtered their spinner 

 

this track has risdublus turn. Last time we played on crazy turner was when Michal Clarke got 6-9 (something like that ) against possibly greatest batting line up this planet has seen v spin. 

 

When we get on normal spinning tracks (like for rest of series ) we will see who is weak against spin 

 

this track was not a turning track it was bonkers lol you will see this o keefe being brought to his knees from now on 

We missed straight deliveries.Just watch the display.

 

Moeen in England,That SA spinner in home series.This didnt come off as a surprise.

 

 

Link to comment

I'm afraid if the home team don't fight back in this series, the Border-Gavaskar Trophy could go the way of the Frank Worrell Trophy and Trans-Tasman Trophy, and become a complete non-event. Australia already hold those other two trophies in perpetuity because of how weak the West Indies and New Zealand test teams are, and if India can't beat Australia at home, where are they going to beat them?

 

Come on boyz, prove me wrong!

 

(And yes, I'm well aware that Australia won eight series in a row against England between 1989 and 2002-03, and some people questioned the relevance of the Ashes during that time.)

Edited by Chalks
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...