Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Runs

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Time Online

    31d 9h 29m 56s

Everything posted by MultiB48

  1. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    these days they use hawkeye cameras not speedguns,even guns vary in pace they are not not all the same, remember in nz the speeds used to be quite slow till they got an uniform setting
  2. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    i saw somewhere roberts had clocked 159k.... whatever these recorded speeds tells us there is no doubt they were quick, as quick as modern day pacers ,the debate is whether they were super human and bowled a lot quicker than anyone we have seen over the last 25 years.i can tell you one thing we wll never see a bowler who bowls over 150ks all the time as long as we live
  3. i think kohli could look to bowl some rollers like chris harris used to, may be the ball will grip a bit more off the surface ,his little floaters are useless
  4. of what i have seen mostly under 130
  5. yes ,even kedar never bowled ,he had to to get in the team.
  6. Ranji Trophy 2017/18

    has sran lost pace? only 2 wkt for 250 runs since coming back
  7. they should look to improve the batting of the pacers in junior and domestic levels,the spinners seem to bat better,ppl like ashwin jadeja,axar, jayant, karn ,mishraji even chawla ,kuldeep too has potential
  8. rubbish,by this logic one will never improve.
  9. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    yes ,its like claiming pollock was quicker than hayward or mcgrath was quicker than lee,or philander is quicker than aaron
  10. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    lol ,where has he said akram was medium pace or a trundler ,he categorically said he was fast-fastmedium,
  11. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    ppl like anderson have maxed out at 145 147 ks ,there isn't a lot of difference among int bowlers in terms of speed ,it's down to skill, vaas was a better bowler than fernando , doesnt mean he was quicker, you are putting the cart before the horse if you claim better pacer means quicker ,and no one here is saying bowlers of the past didnt have pace but that doesnt mean they bowled 153 ks all day or we cant judge pace by watching people on tv,
  12. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    so now you have discarded your garbage theory and acknowledge we can judge speed from a 2d image projection of a 3d object , now its just down to a certain range lol
  13. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    yes like if you watch me and holding bowling on tv you wont be able to tell who is quicker
  14. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    nonsense no batsman can measure pace
  15. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    no batsman can tell the speed of the bowler he is facing
  16. Indias struggle with unknown bowlers !!!

    abnormal bounce ,surely from a crack
  17. It'll Be Johnson 2.0 In Ashes-Warns Mitchell Starc

    not saying eng are fav ,it will be close
  18. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    no one calculates the speed of the ball directly from the screen dumbass ,ppl have memories of different balls /spells and their relatives speeds which gets shown and they make a judgement based on that .Speeds of many such bowlers have been guessed on this forum when speedometer weren't available and no one knew what pace they bowled but later on the speedometer showed speeds in that range ,this clearly shows that it works. a simple example of this is any one can easily state that a pacer will bowl in 100-160 kph range ,now if you cant understand this simple method you are truly special. lol ,anyone you wastes the most amount of time on this forum taking himself too seriously and sprouting nonsense is you ,just check this thread.
  19. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    doesnt matter in which dimension it moves in , it could be 15d for all you know ,we see and estimate mostly in 2d and 3d ,our 3d capabilities are very limited as the displacement in vision is minimal.how we do this is not clearly understood.
  20. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    imran 1st identified waqar as quick after watching him on tv ,you claim holding bowled 95mph all day when no expert ever claimed it, so by your on logic you should reject it. everything around us is optical illusion and you think everything we see around us is in 3d lol distant objects are in 2d , vertical componenets are 2d ,yet we can estimate it.otherwise we wont be able to even walk around or drive or catch or hit cricket balls.
  21. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    i dont have time to argue with an idiot like you
  22. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    why you bring this up when you clearly have no idea how it works.
  23. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    mulo has full faith on him ,his 95mph theory and all these posts in its defense are based on that.
  24. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    like megasthenis was just a traveler but tony cozier isnt just a writer and his opinion that holding could have become a 400 meter word champion is true.
  25. Thommo - how quick was he?'

    yeah thomson said he bowled at 110 mph at his peak at mcc meeting and imran khan and mark nicholas nodded along ,i guess we must believe such experts as we are nobodies infront of them in stature and achievements in terms of cricket,here is that video,

Guest, sign in to access all features.