Jump to content

Muloghonto

Members L2
  • Content Count

    10,158
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Muloghonto

  1. Zen can’t read a) and b) format points. Coz he is a fake feku Hindu trying to destroy our history.
  2. Because of Mahabharata and Brahmo samaj to idegenize our history. You should know by now that nobody on this forum has accessed as much first hand historical sources- meaning coins, inscriptions, edicts, compilations of the said eras- than me.
  3. And as I said, you have made zero refutations and you cannot touch point a or b in previous post, even your fake God can’t save you.
  4. nobody disputed that. But it is secondary to India and it will be less aligned to culture because it’s less aligned to history. Hindustan and India are the same damn name, idiot. One is in Greek, other is in Farsi, both about using Sindh/Indus as the boundary marker. Yet banal assertion with no refutation. You can’t refute the points: a) that which has greater prevalence in history is more representative of history. b) if you think history is inconsequential, then you are anti history and being anti history is anti culture, because you cannot have culture without cultural history. it is YOU that lacks understanding, which is why you cannot touch these points directly. Not even your God can inspire enough honesty in you to address this or integrity to concede. coz YOU ARE A FAKE HINDU, mr. Thomas.
  5. Part of theology and distant past. Not big part of written history and a minor part of history of the last 2000 years.
  6. All my points came with logic, all your points are empty assertions like above, rice bag convert fake Hindu. You said history doesn’t mean much. That is anti Indian history and therefore anti Indian culture. Checkmate and as usual you cannot refute .
  7. Yet overwhelming majority of Hindu literature in the last 1500 years use the word Hindustan way more than bharat. your religious hogwash to erase our history is an insult to our culture and is anti Indian culture.
  8. that is not a sense of history, that is a sense of mythology. Plenty of history fails like the Parthians, Samnites, etc claimed mythological origins. Chalukyas make ZERO mention of the Satavahana kings from just 300 years ago. Meanwhile China had written a compendium of their king list by 50 AD, same with Egypt and the Jews. this is a poor excuse. Jews got scattered but preserved their history. China got utterly annihilated by the Mongols in 1240s and kept all their history. Your rationale is proven false by cultures with much stronger sense of history.
  9. false claim, fake Hindu. You are a western rice bag convert seeking Christian. That’s why you hate our history so much and want to erase it. lol. That was from YOU. NOT ‘ Hindus’. I asked you for evidence, you ran away like a rice bag convert and refused to talk. And that’s also a false claim. I said show evidence, not make god appear in front of my eyes. you ran away and I trapped you so hard that you ended up blocking me. Coz u r a fake Hindu. Nobody is kicking my butt because you cannot counter my points. You said history does not matter. Meaning you are anti Indian history and you seek to trivialize our heritage. Someone who trivializes our history is against our culture. Checkmate.
  10. In the long term, only two jaatis can turn the tide against Muslims while they are not the majority: Sikhs and Chinese (as in their historic control of Muslim lands of east Central Asia). Therefore, modi should accept all Sikh refugees we can and settle them in Kashmir valley. Two birds, one stone.
  11. stop lying. Nobody kicked me out ad I am a hindu myself. Just not a theist one. Kicking out kulin Brahmins....that’s a first. But good job lying and slandering coz you got no logical arguments because our local ancestors left far more books and inscriptions calling it Hindustan, which is Persian form of India, same word cognate, than bharat. A new term can be coined. And a new term is less aligned to our culture than our culturally historically accepted term by everyone. India and Hindustan are the same word root, one in Greek, one in Sanskrit in origin That’s why you are the one failing to present a logical counter and only hiding behind emojis coz you are defeated by logic and have no counter argument, o indian culture hating cosmetic Hindu.
  12. lying as usual. coz you lost. you dont speak for hindus. one book that is a smriti, amongst many. Our ancestors used Hindustan, aka persianized version of India, far more commonly. That is fact and therefore it’s more culturally aligned. Why do you hate the term Hindustan so much ? It’s a term that originates with sindhu being our own periphery and ‘Sindh paar’ meaning foreigner in even post independence era. you have been proven to be anti Indian culture because you said you don’t care for history. Anyone who doesn’t care for history is anti culture, period. More evidence of your inability to debate logically coz you don’t have a point.
  13. you cannot throw out anything without refutation and be called rational. So. Nothing thrown out. false allegation. Nobody kicked me out and there is no evidence or claim to back up kicking out a kulin Brahmin. Neither is such a thing possible. because it’s less aligned to culture because it’s less aligned to history proudly used by our people. We ourselves prefer Hindustan in the past. That is decisive. Crashing case allegation has not been substantiated. You spend million hours saying nonsense, bullshit, thrown out, dismissed and less than 30 seconds arguing the point. Coz u have no point and no challenge. We can all see. So you can only laugh and not challenge logic. Coz u can’t and u r anti Indian culture because u r anti Indian history. As I said, checkmate.
  14. Name calling and saying delusional and there are other ways and this isn’t right etc. Is not logic, it’s just whining. Which is all you have, which is why you cannot axiomatically challenge the thing you are laughing at. Because it is right and just and fair and has also precedence in world culture for continuity. Yours is anti- culture because you are anti history. Those who are anti history can never be pro culture to any real effect. For they are violating culture by violating its living truth. Again, checkmate. Cannot call yourself culturally more aligned and then dismiss history as a must-have in determining culturally aligned.
  15. The flawed thinking is from you, since yo can only laugh and not counter logic. But since you are on record saying you don’t care about history, you have zero authority to talk about what represents the culture of India- as that is based on history. Checkmate.
  16. As usual, you have no logical counter, just empty judgements of things you don’t like and when you are proven wrong via logic. India is more important to our culture than bharat. All explanations given, not a single refutation via logic or facts have been presented by you.
  17. Obviously the historically ignorant person who thinks history is irrelevant thinks it’s unwarranted. Maybe you should spend less time on worshipping that unproven, silent, unknown God delusion of yours. Every statement of yours is hogwash because mine are backed up by logic, yours are just empty pronouncement. You can laugh because that’s all you can do and you cannot counter the logic. That which aligns with the history of our culture and our ancestors, aligns with culture. Our ancestors themselves preferred India and its Persian derivative more than bharat. Respect your ancestors legacy.
  18. As expected, a simpleton with no arguments has nothing cogent to contribute against the simple fact THAT WHICH DOMINATES YOUR HISTORY, IS YOUR HISTORY. taking better decisions and learning from history involves not modifying history due to your own insecurities and learning history objectively. a brand new term can be coined and that brand new term will not be representing cultural heritage because cultural heritage is determined by past prevalence, not whitewashing the past. you can only laugh because you have zero logical counter to the simple factual statement. Like your whole logically vacant position on India just because you are a historically ignorant Hindu who wants an historically obscure modern times popularized term like bharat to dominate because of your cosmetic needs.shame !!
  19. Is that why you specifically side stepped my example of Jews and Chinese ?? Their civilization is intact. Like us, China got invaded a bazillion times and ruled by invaders who butchered them. And worse than us, most Jews got kicked out of their homeland and lived like Dalits in a boonie village of India. Yet they remember their history. We don’t. Why are you so afraid to admit the simple fact that hindus and Indians totally suck at remembering their history ?
  20. Understanding facts don’t change the facts. The why doesn’t change the is. Your cultural identity history is whatever has been used most often historically by you and others. No amount of trying to twist this simple fact will change the fact.
  21. mature human beings don’t ignore facts and history because they were brutal or unsavoury. For a mature mind, the past is an objective fact: if you have called a horse a donkey for 2000 years, then objective fact is, it’s identity is that of a donkey for 2000 years. It’s pleasure or displeasure is irrelevant to this fact. Not to mention, more than one person has made it clear that unlike your horse and donkey example, we LIKE the tag India and we WANT it to define us. That’s why my posts in this threads have more likes than yours
  22. How does that relate to the point that they are way better at remembering history than us and we have to rectify it ?
  23. facts are facts, facts don’t care about right or wrong perspective. What is historically more prevalent is a fact and it is a fact that what is more prevalent historically is more definitive historically. waving white flag before even the battle, just like some of our coward ancestors, we see. a fail is a fail. Failure to remember is a failure to remember. You said remembering or not remembering is of no consequence- meaning or history is of no consequence to you. Thus proving my point that you don’t care about our history. It’s made by one who cares for objective facts and don’t use feelings to hide or twist facts like you do. Nice counter. Aka I win by default, thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...