Jump to content

swastikpanda2

Members L2
  • Content Count

    68
  • Runs

    2,780 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Time Online

    16d 6m 11s

About swastikpanda2

  • Rank
    DraV

Recent Profile Visitors

514 profile views
  1. swastikpanda2

    Msd Odi average watch

    For Indian fans: Yes. His poor form is a concern. For Dhoni and his Fans: No. If he would have cared about his poor form then he should have retired a long ago.
  2. swastikpanda2

    Msd Odi average watch

    Dhoni presently averages 50.24 in ODI with 10150 runs from 280 innings out of which he had stayed not out in 78 innings. If Dhoni scores 150 in his next 5 innings. (Assuming he scores around 30 which looks unlikely because of his poor batting form) he will then average 49.75 i.e, below 50. So There is a very high chance that the desire of playing 2019 WC is going to make a dent on his ATG (above 50 average.) His Odi legacy might also be questioned in future. Looking how Dhoni had resigned and retired, Don't be surprised if he retires during this WI Odi series.
  3. 1. The bowling line up is against the standard world class norm. Historically, No team has won a World Cup by playing just 2 pace bowler. (Except Sri Lanka in 1996.) 2. The spin bowlers don't bowl during death overs. Imagine Bhuvi/Bumrah having an off day or getting injured. 3. Chahal is a okayish fielder with no batting and doesn't even bowl during powerplay and death overs. He is no world class bowler either. So his position can be debatable. 4. India has developed a lot as a cricketing nation. You can see now India has two bowlers with one averaging 19( who doesn't bowl during tough period) and other 22 (who bowls during tough time). Fans believe there shouldn't be any place for average bowlers in the team. 5. Bhuvi has very poor stats in Odi. But he provides batting depth to the team. Second seamer for the team? Again debatable. These are might be the reasons. It's a forum. People will have opinions just like you. They may want to see the team become like the Invincibles Australians of 2000 and WIs of 1980. This team is not. There is always a place for betterment.
  4. swastikpanda2

    Please drop Pandya to maintain Test cricket’s sanctity.

    Different perspectives. I would prefer a batting all rounder/ bowling all rounder over a pure all-rounder.
  5. swastikpanda2

    Please drop Pandya to maintain Test cricket’s sanctity.

    It won't happen. Can say that there is 90% chance, he won't. The team management has messed up Pandya experiment. They burden Pandya to become a improved bowler in LOI because he is the fifth bowler. And want Pandya to be a player in Test who will contribute more with bat and won't be given more than 10 overs an innings. There is no clarity. He has different roles in different format. He can't improve this way. He will most probably be a Afridi 2.0. Impact player, Inconsistent bowler, Inconsistent batsman, Can win you a match on his day. Are there any world class all rounder who didn't have any primary skill? I only think of Shakib Al Hasan, who I don't think belongs to ATG level.
  6. swastikpanda2

    India A Quadrangular One-Day Series, 2018 - Indian Squads updated

    India B and Australia A . Points table. India B - 12 India A - 9 Australia A - 12 SA A - 9
  7. Grind them! Make these English bowlers bowl atleast 25-30 overs. Make them Exhausted for the remaining 2 test matches.
  8. swastikpanda2

    Whats this agenda that India Today is running against Pandya?

    Ain't comparing anything. Just wanted to point that Stokes wasn't a failure in India. He even bagged the highest IPL contract for foreign player on the basis of his performance in India. The thing is Stokes scored a ton and even took a fifer in Test series. Can say it as a decent performance but a failure? I don't think so.
  9. swastikpanda2

    Whats this agenda that India Today is running against Pandya?

    All what I had written, was about India- England test and odi series in India. It wasn't about Stokes debut series.
  10. swastikpanda2

    Whats this agenda that India Today is running against Pandya?

    Stokes in the first test of India-England series in India scored a hundred in the first innings and took a fifer in the 3rd test of that series. He was their best pacer along with broad I think. Stokes was one of their best players in that test series. Woakes was very poor in that test series. In Odis, Stokes wasn't good with ball (remember those were high scoring matches) but contributed well with the bat and Woakes was the best new ball bowler in the Odi series who also won the 3rd Odi with his batting. Ben stokes even bagged a very high Ipl contract in 2017 because of his all round performance in India.
  11. swastikpanda2

    Please drop Pandya to maintain Test cricket’s sanctity.

    I spoke as a general case. I had even written in that post. Pandya should play since Bhuvi isn't there.
  12. swastikpanda2

    Please drop Pandya to maintain Test cricket’s sanctity.

    Agreed. Same views mate.
  13. swastikpanda2

    Please drop Pandya to maintain Test cricket’s sanctity.

    There are many Pandya fans. Kohli and his Team management are the biggest one. I am against of the fact that Pandya is a sure starter in the team, which he shouldn't be. Wouldn't have played him if Bhuvi wasn't unfit.
  14. swastikpanda2

    Please drop Pandya to maintain Test cricket’s sanctity.

    There's no merit of playing Pandya in Subcontinental tests. Aswin and Jadeja can contribute with bat. We can play an Kuldeep Yadav to develop him. It's unfortunate that Pandya is a sure starter in Tests for India even though he has proved so little.
  15. swastikpanda2

    Please drop Pandya to maintain Test cricket’s sanctity.

    India is obessed with Hardik Pandya. It's justified to play him in LOI because he strikes the ball hard and comes handy in LOI. But on what basis he was consistently invested in Tests when he has FC bowling average of 38? When we look into the Tests 11 line up the second player who is sure to play apart from Kohli is Pandya, doesn't matter even if it is subcontinent. Every other test players Ashwin, Rahane, Pujara, Vijay, Bhuvi, Jadeja are droppable. Why do we drop Jadeja, No. 3 ranked bowler? Because of conditions. Why don't we play Bhuvi everywhere? Because of Conditions. Why are we playing Pandya even in Subcontinent, when Jayant Yadav seems a better AR in Subcontinent? Because we are investing in Pandya. The question is why India should invest on Pandya for Tests? Even if they would what is the logic of providing a consistent run of 15 Test matches to him? We have Rahul Dravid coaching the India A. What is his job, if players are supposed to get 15-20 Test matches to develop themselves by wasting a slot for No.1 team in the world? Ben Stokes and Hardik Pandya are not even comparable as AR, as the former made a ton in his second test match against a rampaging Johnson and took a 6- fer in his 4th test match in the high profile Ashes, showing his All-round skills. What has Pandya shown in his bowling? He even averages 38 in FC, where trundlers average below 30. Hardik Pandya is lucky to be playing Tests because India fancies a pace bowling all rounder in team like Kapil. In my opinion, let him play for 4 day matches for India A consistently under Dravid. Even then he can gain the international experience as he is consistently playing LOI. Also he can be selected as a reserve in Tests. It's always better to play 5 bowlers with a few of them who can bat. I think we were absolutely ruthless like that, till that England home series. P.s. Presently he should be playing because we don't have Bhuvi who is our second best batsman. Can play as his replacement.

Guest, sign in to access all features.

×