Jump to content

Alam_dar

Members L2
  • Content Count

    1,261
  • Runs

    44,640 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Time Online

    84d 20h 34m 26s

1 Follower

About Alam_dar

  • Rank
    Marauder from Najafgarh
  • Birthday 08/14/1975

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Alam_dar

    De-colonizing Aryan Invasion Theory

    I am afraid that you have missed the message totally. TheHindu is not the source of this scientific study, but only quoting it. The name of Study is: A genetic chronology for the Indian Subcontinent points to heavily sex-biased dispersals It has been peer reviewed and published in journal ‘BMC Evolutionary Biology’. Here is the direct link to this complete study: https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-017-0936-9 Why the old Studies were wrong? Here is the reason: // Until recently, only data on mtDNA (or matrilineal DNA, transmitted only from mother to daughter) were available and that seemed to suggest there was little external infusion into the Indian gene pool over the last 12,500 years or so. New Y-DNA data has turned that conclusion upside down, with strong evidence of external infusion of genes into the Indian male lineage during the period in question. The reason for the difference in mtDNA and Y-DNA data is obvious in hindsight: there was strong sex bias in Bronze Age migrations. In other words, those who migrated were predominantly male and, therefore, those gene flows do not really show up in the mtDNA data. On the other hand, they do show up in the Y-DNA data // The thorniest, most fought-over question in Indian history is slowly but surely getting answered: did Indo-European language speakers, who called themselves Aryans, stream into India sometime around 2,000 BC – 1,500 BC when the Indus Valley civilisation came to an end, bringing with them Sanskrit and a distinctive set of cultural practices? Genetic research based on an avalanche of new DNA evidence is making scientists around the world converge on an unambiguous answer: yes, they did. Ok, let us see how these anti Aryan-Dravidian theory scientists are going to answer this Latest research, which I presented above, which is obviously proving the Aryan-Dravidian issue completely without any doubts now. It is common sense that no scientist could now deny it in the light of this latest research. I don't know what else should I say, while the proof here is itself so clear that no room for any further discussion is left. If you really want to contradict this study, then you have to bring the videos/articles/studies which specifically discuss these scientific proofs, and then bring counter scientific proofs to contradict this study. I already searched, but found no reply from the opponents against this latest study.
  2. Alam_dar

    De-colonizing Aryan Invasion Theory

    I made it very clear in the earlier thread too that the MOST LATEST Scientific Study about Genetic Science is proving absolutely other conclusion. It is also telling why earlier scientific studies made this huge error. Let me quote from my earlier thread once again: Here is the most modern study, published in 2017 in the peer-reviewed journal called ‘BMC Evolutionary Biology’.. You can read about it in this article: // https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/how-genetics-is-settling-the-aryan-migration-debate/article19090301.ece How genetics is settling the Aryan migration debate ... Until recently, only data on mtDNA (or matrilineal DNA, transmitted only from mother to daughter) were available and that seemed to suggest there was little external infusion into the Indian gene pool over the last 12,500 years or so. New Y-DNA data has turned that conclusion upside down, with strong evidence of external infusion of genes into the Indian male lineage during the period in question. The reason for the difference in mtDNA and Y-DNA data is obvious in hindsight: there was strong sex bias in Bronze Age migrations. In other words, those who migrated were predominantly male and, therefore, those gene flows do not really show up in the mtDNA data. On the other hand, they do show up in the Y-DNA data: specifically, about 17.5% of Indian male lineage has been found to belong to haplogroup R1a (haplogroups identify a single line of descent), which is today spread across Central Asia, Europe and South Asia. Pontic-Caspian Steppe is seen as the region from where R1a spread both west and east, splitting into different sub-branches along the way. ... // Also read it too. In light of this latest research, it seems that this discussion has indeed already been settled. It may be against the wishes of the Hindutva supporters, but scientific approach should not be religiously biased. I also wondered when the Caste System began, and why devils are almost always Dark Skinned, while Hero gods are always fair skinned (except for Kali) in stories in Hindu religious texts. ==== The caste system is believed to have been established by the Aryans. The fair skinned Aryans who occupied parts of India established the caste system. The community Sudras was of the locals who were subdued by the Aryans and the other were the descendants of Aryans with locals. In Hindu religious stories there are many wars between the good Aryans and the dark skinned demons and devils. The different Gods also have dark skinned slaves. There are stories of demon women trying to seduce good Aryan men in deceptive ways. There were also marriages between Aryan heroes and demon women. Many believe that these incidences really occurred in which, the gods and the positive heroes were people of Aryan origin. And the demons, the devils and the dark skinned slaves were in fact the original residence of India whom the Aryans coined as monsters, devil, demons and slaves. Normally the date given to Aryan invasion is around 1500 BC. But according to Hinduism experts some of the events in Hinduism occurred much earlier. Some of the events like the great war in the Mahabharta epic is believed to have occurred (based on astronomical research) 7000 years ago. link
  3. Alam_dar

    Hindus are forced to leave village in West Bengal

    Zulm jab had say badhta hai to Khud mit jata hai I am sure same thing will happen with the Muslims for practising the Extremist teachings of Islam.
  4. Alam_dar

    India’s first terrorist was a Hindu: Kamal Haasan

    Hahaha Sorry dear friend if I offended you. I was not intended to do it, but Tapanay may maza aya . You please also just chill and enjoy it too, nothing serious here.
  5. Alam_dar

    India’s first terrorist was a Hindu: Kamal Haasan

    Lastly, what is exactly the definition of Terrorism? And if really Hindus could never be Terrorists? terrorism /ˈtɛrərɪzəm/ noun the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. "the fight against terrorism" Why this definition could not be applied to Saffron Brigade members who are lynching in name of respect of cow? And perhaps slavery and the Caste system should also come under terrorism where violence was used against one group of people.
  6. Alam_dar

    India’s first terrorist was a Hindu: Kamal Haasan

    A comment, which needs an answer: ======================= V.Suresh In 2003, the BJP under Vajpayee crossed an important milestone when it succeeded in getting a portrait of Damodar Savarkar installed in the Parliament buildings. Savarkar whom the BJP & RSS adoringly call “Veer Savarkar” was one of the 9 men indicted for the killing of Gandhiji. Savarkar, who pioneered Hindutva was one of the architects of this needless killing. He he was aided and abetted by both the RSS & the Hindu Mahasabha. Savarkar escaped the gallows on a technicality. But the project now comes full circle with the BJP attempts to recast Godse as the good guy who defended Hindus. Indeed, a BJP spokesperson very respectfully calls him “Godse ji” in the clip at: bit.ly/2JBtYsG. I wouldn’t be surprised if the BJP now allows the Hindu Mahasabha to continue with its Godse temple project. I guess the next milestone would be a portrait of Godse in the Parliament. As a European newspaper described the BJP : Gandhi on its lips, Godse in its heart Is this what India wants? ==== To be honest, I personally also belief that it is true: Gandhi on BJP's lips, Godse in its heart There is a whole debate of Kanhiya Kumar, when he asked the BJP representative woman why she was using the word "Godse Ji"? Why to attach "Ji" as sign of respect for Godse? And she was unable to reply. We could also find many BJP supporters who are actually openly showing their thanks to Godse for saving them from Gandhi by killing him.
  7. Alam_dar

    India’s first terrorist was a Hindu: Kamal Haasan

    https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/kamal-haasan-on-nathuram-godse-remark-didnt-use-the-term-terrorist/article27138807.ece Nathuram Godse remark: Didn’t use the term ‘terrorist’, says Kamal Haasan Makkal Needhi Maiyam (MNM) founder Kamal Haasan speaks at a rally for Tirupparankundram assembly by election at Thoppur in Madurai on May 15, 2019. | Photo Credit: R. Ashok .... “Understand the meaning for the word extremist. I could have used the word terrorist or murderer (against Godse)... ours is active politics, there won’t be any violence,” he said while resorting to wordplay in Tamil to drive home his point. .... “I am not saying this because this is Muslim-dominated area, but I am saying this before a statue of Gandhi. Free India’s first extremist was a Hindu, his name is Nathuram Godse. There it (extremism, apparently) starts,” he had said in bypoll-bound Aravakurichi.
  8. Alam_dar

    How Kids are brainwashed in the Church

    In an ideal situation, Kids should not be allowed to enter into any religion till 18 years. After 18, they could themselves decide to convert to any religion that they want. To be truthful, ALL PARENTS of ALL RELIGIONS are involved in brainwashing of their children in one way or another.
  9. Alam_dar

    India’s first terrorist was a Hindu: Kamal Haasan

    I personally think that Killer is one who kills due to "Personal" reasons. Assassin could be one who kills for Money. While Terrorists is one who has some type of Ideological hatred (regional or religious) behind the killing. But this needs to have some network, while Godse did it in his individual capacity. While killing by Godse had ideological motive, thus Kamal Hasan seems to be right when he used the word "Extremist" for him.
  10. Alam_dar

    India’s first terrorist was a Hindu: Kamal Haasan

    According to BBC Urdu, Kamal didn't use the word Terrorist or Assassin, but he used the word whose exact translation is "Extremist".
  11. Alam_dar

    How Kids are brainwashed in the Church

    This is such an innocent post by brother of my land @Number, that I am scratching my head how to reply.
  12. Alam_dar

    kashmiri 3 year old girl raped by muslim

    What you stated above about difference in sex and rape, it may be correct. But let me also add that there exists other point of view too, which differs from this. According to this other view, in Human Nature, the Sex and the Power are very much linked to each other. Human history is full of stories where power was used for obtaining the women. In animal Kingdom too, males are using excessive power in order to get their sexual desired fulfilled. In other words, 100% males of many species could be called psychopaths/rapists. When we look at ground realities (which I mentioned above about rape of Children in Madaris, Churches, Pashtoon areas ...) then it is evident that indeed if sexual desires are fulfilled, then there is LESS chance of Frustration, which could ultimately lead to a society with less risk of sexual crimes. Getting 100% sexual criminal free society is impossible. Religion and Social pressure will fail against the Frustrations as we see Muslim Mullahs and Christian Pastors are involved in these child rapes. Making society open to sex at age of 16, in my opinion, could only be one of important step to minimize the frustration and to minimize the risks of sex related crimes.
  13. Alam_dar

    kashmiri 3 year old girl raped by muslim

    People are here furious upon this incident. Please allow me the liberty to put my thoughts OPENLY. These are my observations and feelings, which may be correct or may be wrong. I feel that Human Nature is playing a role in sex related crimes. It always did. A lot of killings were made in order to get the women of other groups in the stone age. This continued in the neolithic era too. Males are getting their puberty at 14. And they do get frustrated if their natural desire is not fulfilled. Is it a fact, or could we deny it? This frustration leads the young boys to indulge in masturbating (many times a weak), or watching porno films today (starting at the age of 16-17 years). I believe, if social/religious pressure is not present, and they find the consenting girls/women, then almost all of them will indulge in sexual activity in this age. Another part of this study is this that Mullahs in Pakistani Madaris are found to be indulged in Child Rape at huge huge rate. You will not be able to see women outside in many Pushtoon areas. Result is huge huge rate of Pashtoons indulged in Bacha Bazi (child rape or gay activities). Christian Pastors don't marry, but they are also involved hugely in child rape. In Pakistan, people used to guard the graves of the young dead girls/women for several nights, while people in Pakistan have become so much frustrated that they even started raping the dead bodies in graveyards in the nights. After looking all this situation, I feel that perhaps we have to make sex more open in our societies, even for boy and girls at the age of 16. Perhaps this could help to come over a lot of frustration and may help in reducing the sexual harassment and sexual crimes.
  14. Just watch these 2 videos. Surely, it is not limited to Church only. Welcome to the Madrassas where you will see many folds more brainwashing of the kids and result is Jihadist Zombies.
  15. No, I was not talking about your post, but I was commenting directly upon the SONG in the video, which was about Israel and its occupation from Israel and their pledge to free Palestine through Jihad and killings. That is why I said that in case of Palestine/Israel issue, the problem has become double i.e. Religion+Arab Nationalism. Yasir Arafat and his Fateh Movement were non religion, but they are based upon Arab Nationalism. While Hamas and Islamic Jihad and Hizbullah movements are based upon Religion + Arab Nationalism. Fateh also had such Nasheed (songs) where they teach to kill the Israelis, but at least they were not mixed with Jihad. I believe perhaps Israelis would also have such type of songs where they are encouraged to kill and destroy the enemy. In fact Quran/Sunnah and Bible are much worse than such songs while they have open teachings of beheading ALL the men enemies and to take All the women/children as slaves.

Guest, sign in to access all features.

×