Jump to content

Malcolm Merlyn

Administrators
  • Content Count

    16,614
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Malcolm Merlyn

  1. No its not. Tell people how icc is funding pakistan and terrorism in india indirectly. They will not look at the WC. Without India there will not be a WC. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  2. Foreign policy and laws have to be followed. Fifa cant do anything about it. Teams boycott Israel many times. Laws of the land trump any such laws of sporting bodies. WADA has had to face many such thrashings in courts. The "unappealable" judgement isnt really unappealable. All such arbitration awards are subject to being rejected if they are againist the laws of the country its applied in. Thats part of the 1996 arbitration act. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  3. And indian team can simply refuse to turn up for the icc tournament. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  4. The SC should have appointed better people than a retired govt Babu,a nobody woman cricketer,a gandhi family boot licking historian.The only competent man was Vikram Limaye who quit long back.
  5. When i was criticizing Lodha and CoA many posters who on this thread are today criticiizng them were supporting them
  6. Thats the word floating around. Hence bcci is going to challenge the case on 2 grounds. 1. Pcb didnot support the Big 3. 2. GoI has stopped the tour and hence is beyond bcci control. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  7. Because ICC decided so. They made a chutiya out of CoA. Basically threatened them into agreeing to this case. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  8. The case is being heard under english laws and the seat of hearing is considered as UK. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  9. Bcci is likely to lose the case as the letter is valid under UK contractual laws. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  10. This is a arbitration committee. Slyly the ICC has made the seat of court as UK even though the actual venue is UAE. Hence the judgement can be enforced by an indian court under 1996 arbitration act. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  11. Here is the document if anyone is interested to read it. This is an MOU?More like letter of intent at the maximum. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  12. Its actually a arbitration court under 1996 arbitration laws. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  13. GoI is not a direct party. But it will lose face if bcci has to pay pakistanis. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  14. If money keeps flowing to pcb then it defeats the purpose of GOI. The current dispute is India not playing pakistan. Thats due to the GOI. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  15. Will it be a loss of face for the Modi govt if BCCI is forced to pay? If yes then expect GOI to invoke Enemy property Act. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  16. Old Bcci hands are not too optimistic. ICC wants to limit the Bcci. So they will try everything. Thing is if bcci is forced to pay $70mn it will be a big loss of face for modi govt. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  17. I wonder if the GOI will let even a penny go to pcb. It will be a serious loss of face. Opposition will kill them. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  18. Seems Bcci will be screwed out of 70mn. CoA ko badhai. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...