Jump to content

Zero_Unit

Members L2
  • Content count

    2,314
  • Runs

    14,880 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Time Online

    8d 11h 31m 51s

About Zero_Unit

  • Rank
    Prince of Calcutta
  • Birthday 02/08/1980
  1. Rain is saving our arse today. Good stuffs.
  2. IPL is on top, bottom 2 is your pick between BPL and PSL. The quality of cricket is SH*T, broadcast is SH*T, COmmentators are SH*T, Alot of players playing for those 2 leagues are unkown/retired/can't find a place in the national team. Does psl even have any cheerleaders :P ? I would rate BPL a bit more than psl, simply because atleast they get to play in front of their own home country. Usually when you watch IPL, it's colorful, cheerful and fun. Even BBL or CPL. Watching these two leagues is so boring.
  3. I agree with OP, sooner or later, he will burnout. Maybe hand over the test captaincy. I mean Jesus Christ, this lad plays cricket day in day out and then ipl aswell.
  4. ***BPL 2017***

    Lmaoooo, that's a good burn!
  5. Hardik pandya as a player

    Guys are being too harsh on him. The guy is still finding his wings in international team. From what I am seeing, he is in the right direction. If he keeps on performing exactly like this, give him a couple more years, you will see him as the top allrounder in the world of this generation of core players.
  6. 2018 Player Ranking Predictions

    Y u make a joke out of yourself bro?
  7. Ah man, thought the game was tonight. Wanted to see Nehra play one last time in BLUE :'(
  8. top it off with Taylor in form, you actually have a lethal batting line up right there.
  9. If we compare today, at this specific point, not a year back, PAK is better. The champion trophy really turned it around for them. However, if you want to take the last couple of years into consideration, BD > PAK in ODI atleast.
  10. Sri Lanka's cricketers refuse to tour Pakistan

    Not really all that surprised. Espacially from a team that actually took the bullets.
  11. Once again, wtf are you even talking about? It's pointless to compare babar to sachin's stats/feats. Sachin played in a different era and ended his carrer when the game has changed significantly. Back in the days, 250 was a good score, compare that today, 250 is a joke score. Back in the days, fielding restriction was not as brutal as it's today. No new two balls, bats were not as meaty as today, even 100's were rare. You have no clue on wtf you are even talking about, do you? And what do you mean by WE? The only person that' even started to bring out stats is YOU. Not WE ...
  12. Biggest Shocks of 2017 in Cricket

    CT - Pakistan winning it. No bigger shock than this in 2k17 cricket.
  13. Bro, it doesn't matter how fast you get there but it does matter how you end it. No point of dragging Tendulkar's or Virat's name around to compare with Babar here. Tendulkar is and will end up being on of the best batsmen to have ever played this game. Same goes for Virat. Babar is a 'barely legal' in international cricket. Let him grow his wings before the comparaison starts.
  14. I can't help you if you don't know the difference between comparing vs using x y or z to set as an example. Perhaps a visit to dictionary.com would clarify your incompetency on this matter? Or should have paid better attention during those English classes perhaps? Not really hard to understand, is it? No where in my discussion have I compared Kohli (am like one of the biggest Virat fanboy) to his new kid in town. Used him - who is a quality player like root and co - as an example. Let's assume x = Virat (you may replace him with root, Warner, Williamson, etc). Example bro, example, not comparaison. Get your head together! To me it seems like you can't defend your logic, hence hellbend on trying to tell us that I was comparing him with Kohli, what a joke! You are up uptight about his centuries and stated clearly that it does not matter cause it came against weaker team. I simply pointed out that if a quality player - once again, I used Virat as an example, not comparaison. Remember, x's value can be interchangeable in this case - hits a century against weaker team, does that mean his contribution toward his avg is meaningless since he scored them against 'nobody' - your words, not mine. So if a quality player scores a century against the likes of 'nobody', their centuries doesn't matter either or count towards their avg? Like I said previously, he has done a decent job till now. The number of matches he has played is not enough to start judging him. Still too early in his career. Let him hit 50 matches atleast before taking him out to the cleaners. Still, if he is avg'ing 50 ish in international cricket, it does tell us that he has potential. But, how he carries himself throughout his career is upto him and the amount of hardwork he decides to put into it if he wants to seperate himself from avg Joe to an all star Joe.
  15. What are you even talking about. Might want to read our whole convo before jumping on the bandwagon. His logic: babar's centuries should not matter cause it came against weaker teams since he is a 'nobody' My logic: (used Virat as an example) should we disregard quality players century against weaker team aswell? The point is, he is doing a decent job ATM and is early in his career. No point on assuming that he will be a failure. After 50 or so matches, we can have a discussion on where this lad is heading.

Guest, sign in to access all features.

×