Jump to content

asterix

Moderators
  • Content Count

    31,740
  • Runs

    274,320 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8
  • Time Online

    39d 5h 19m 58s

Everything posted by asterix

  1. asterix

    Twitter Updates...

    Let’s use this thread to update interesting, entertaining & funny messages on twitter. Please follow forum guidelines wile posting your updates.
  2. A post containing the names of 60 Indian academicians from colleges all over the country, who have been accused of sexual harassment has been doing the rounds on Facebook. It has been created by Raya Sarkar, who describes herself as an "attorney interested in prisoner's rights, reproductive rights, and anti-caste jurisprudence" in her bio. Apart from Koushik Roy, Bidyut Chakraborty, Nilanjan Dutta, RC Natrajan, Shyamal Sengupta, Mridul Bose, and BN Ray, Firstpost has not been able to independent verify whether a complaint has been filed, registered, or any charges have been filed against the rest of the academicians whose names have been included in this list. Sarkar has invited other women to contribute to the list, which has now grown to this figure of 60 names of professors who work in institutions like Jawaharlal Nehru University, Tata Institute of Social Sciences and Film and Television Institute of India. As of 25 October, this list included more than 10 professors from Jadavpur University, nine from Delhi University and two from JNU. It also has names from Christ University, Ambedkar University Delhi and the Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute. "If any one knows of academics who have sexually harassed/were sexually predatory to them or have seen it first hand PM me and I'll add them to the list," writes Sarkar in her post. She says that she has a full list of the names of victims too, but that she will not reveal it. She also said that one of the victims will be filing an internal complaint soon. She has written that the purpose of the list is to make people wary of these professors. "This list is not for their colleagues chai biscuit gossip or some kind of crusade to get them kicked out of their Universities because if that were actually possible they would be long gone," she writes. Every time a commenter has expressed disbelief over the appearance of a particular name in the list, Sarkar has maintained that the accusations were confirmed by multiple sources who have reported instances to her directly. "Most if not all are first person accounts of people who were molested/sexually harassed by the people who have been put on this list. Rest are a friend they (the victims) have chosen to specifically contact me as they fear their identity being disclosed. In fact, since there is a disturbing amount of rape apologia and victim blaming the victims have gone out of their way to show me screenshots of them being harassed and abused by the people they have named," writes Sarkar in a comment on the post. Firstpost spoke to one of the academicians on the list, who wishes to be anonymous, and asked him to respond to these allegations. "My name was dropped and then added again. When I reached out to her, I was blocked. If she believes in freedom of speech, why isn't she telling me what I've done? I am feeling like a victim," he said. Some people and organisations have supported Sarkar and the list. Kafila, which publishes pieces on contemporary issues authored by Indian academics, scholars, writers and journalists, has released an official statement about this list, condemning it. The authors have said that naming people in this manner can "delegitimise" the fight against sexual harassment and have appealed to the people behind this list to withdraw it. "We are dismayed by the initiative on Facebook, in which men are being listed and named as sexual harassers with no context or explanation. One or two names of men who have been already found guilty of sexual harassment by due process, are placed on par with unsubstantiated accusations. It worries us that anybody can be named anonymously, with lack of answerability," reads the statement. It has been signed by 14 women who identify themselves as feminists. These women include Ayesha Kidwai and Nivedita Menon, who are professors at JNU; Kavita Krishnan, an activist and secretary of the All India Progressive Women's Association (AIPWA); and Vrinda Grover, a lawyer and human and women's rights activist. They go on to say that when there is a genuine complaint filed, there are institutions and procedures which must be made use of, whilst acknowledging that the process is "harsh and often tilted against the complainant". They say that they are committed to due process, which they term 'fair and just'. Firstpost has mailed Raya Sarkar a set of questions, but is yet to receive a reply. This article will be updated with her responses when she does. Link: http://www.firstpost.com/india/list-of-indian-academicians-accused-of-sexual-harassment-goes-viral-polarised-opinions-emerge-4174397.html
  3. asterix

    Adorable/funny animals...

    I love birds & animals... I absolutely adore Parrots/Parakeets... I find them very intelligent... I find cats very funny.... Please use this thread to share your views, videos etc.
  4. asterix

    Champions Trophy all over again?

    Not sure how much money the Betting Mafia will make tonight... If you notice sudden and drastic change in players performances and strange decision by captain, rest assured that the match outcome has already been decided at the very top level. No point blaming the players as they have to follow orders. If you see Bangladesh makeshft openers making a century stand, best is to not increase your BP, just dont follow the match and do something useful... :nice:
  5. This is not a topic and credit to England for outclassing India in the test series... However, I’ve noticed that umpires have been exceedingly harsh on Indian team and players throughout the series, be it using like a group of errand boys to ask bat during rain interruption to bow Ishant being given 2 “ final warnings” for landing, albeit “marginally and occasionally”,in the danger area of pitch where as Holding pointed out that Clouderson actually bowls landing in the danger area day in & out! Hence I’m asking you to suggest more ways and means to the ICC umpires to treat this Indian team worse than a 3rd class asylum seekers...
  6. We really want an off spinner who can keep things simple but bowls potent orthodox off spin with discipline. We need somebody on whom we can rely for a long time, now that Ashwin has gone downhill... Please suggest some good upcoming young options...
  7. Moeen Ali picking 9 wickets and our fat arse Constipated Donkey got one wicket...
  8. From 86/6 to on the brink of winning the match in the 4th day... Mashallah! Ali keeps of taking wickets... And we’ve a fat arse veshti wearing constipated idiot...
  9. As I said, I’ve no favourite players... Anybody who shows temperament or skills to justify selection, I’ll support hm...
  10. Drop this Fido-Dido...
  11. He’s very straight forward... not sure if he spins a lot.. Need somebody who can give a good tweak...but can be tried... Somebody like Rajesh Chauhan...
  12. Don’t want to even check the scores as instead of score the wickets column keeps Changing...
  13. Team India actually discusses which opposition bowler they’ve to TARGET in the innings to DONATE most of the wickets...
  14. The World didn’t wanted a boisterous Bewda claiming all the credits, hence the team secretly decided to screw him in...
  15. asterix

    Will KL Rahul make it count in the 2nd innings?

    Next test is anyway gone for him... I actually don’t want to see him in test cricket... I’m sure there’ll be other young players who’ll grab the chance and excel...
  16. There’s a method in his madness... Kohli isn’t bothered about this series results. He wanted to EXPOSE Ashwin’s bowling... and boy, expose he did... Ashwin is done for this series atleast...
  17. asterix

    Guess the margin of defeat for India?

    By the looks of it, India won’t cross 100 runs... The batsmen are not prepared for the in coming balls... Most of the wickets will be using incoming deliveries...
  18. asterix

    Will KL Rahul make it count in the 2nd innings?

    That’s enough of him... Bye Bye KLPD Rahul...
  19. Ashwin misses his mark at the worst moment How will R Ashwin review his bowling today? Poor? Average? Could have been better? Good is not an option because, even Ashwin would admit, he was not good today. A return of just one wicket in 35 overs supports a good rating not being an option. The conditions could not have been more in favour of spin. The sun was out from ball one and by afternoon some fans were sun bathing. The pitch was bone dry. The footholes could be seen from Mars. England were vulnerable in the mind. They had even opted to protect Joe Root and experiment with Moeen Ali at No. 3, and failed. Ashwin could have not have customised a pitch as good as this one. Yet, significantly so by his high standards, Ashwin struggled. His struggles affected India's position in this match and, probably, even this series. That was not the script handed to the Indians when the day started. Cheteshwar Pujara had swung the momentum by helping India take a small lead on Friday. This morning, speaking to the host broadcaster, Pujara agreed Ashwin would be the key for India. A man of few words, Pujara was not afraid to wage a punt and say Ashwin would easily find wickets. "He will," Pujara said. "With his experience he will pick up a few wickets. He is a clever bowler. He will definitely utilise the rough and there some turn from the centre as well. It is not just the pitch, but the dryness of the pitch which will allow him to spin the ball." Ashwin would have watched earnestly, and with some glee, the way Moeen challenged Pujara by pitching into the footholes. Although Pujara defended him by lunging forward from the crease, the chance of bat-pad or even lbw was in play. In that first over Moeen had landed the ball twice into the footholes. In contrast Ashwin struggled to land the ball twice in succession in the rough during the course of the day, split into two spells. Working out the right pace is the basis to finding rhythm for a spinner. Ashwin tinkered with his speeds, for a long time being in the mid-to-high 50mph mark, at times touching as high as 58mph (93kph). What that meant was even if he landed on the footholes, at this high speed he could not take advantage. Ashwin's average speed usually is around 51mph (82kph), but he could never get it down to that consistently. According to pundits, one of the best ways to take advantage of the rough is to give flight to the ball and pitch it at slower speeds into the rough. That, they point out, allows the ball to turn sharply or jump unpredictably, creating doubt in the batsman's mind. Ashwin did find some turn, but varied his speeds constantly, which possibly meant he did not get enough purchase. Length is another key element for a spinner. Erapalli Prasanna, the former Indian offspinner, would often remark, length is mandatory. If you compared the lengths bowled by Moeen and Ashwin, the one glaring difference concerned the good-length deliveries. Compared to the 61% of deliveries Moeen pitched on a good length yesterday, today Ashwin managed just under 50% (98 out of 210). Ashwin's lengths were otherwise either full length (77) or back-of-length (27) allowing the England batsmen to manoeuvre him quite comfortably. Ashwin, like Pujara reiterated at the end of the day, is a clever bowler. But you get the impression that he tries too hard at times. Despite the sizeable patches of rough on both sides of the pitch, Ashwin failed to hurt the outside edge of the left handers by spinning it from the rough outside their leg stump; the outside edge of the right handers was similarly untroubled. He kept changing his line of delivery from around the stumps to over or the other way round, especially against the left-handers like Keaton Jennings, Ben Stokes and later Sam Curran. Early on Jennings attacked Ashwin by picking up two fours in an over. The first was a reverse sweep. It was a shot that Ashwin had attempted and failed embarrassingly with the previous day. At that point Ashwin had a slip and a leg slip. Soon he would push the leg slip back to short fine leg to get cover. He would reduce the speed and flight the ball more and pitch fuller. He beat Jennings once fair and square. But the pressure was not constant, which allowed the batsman to get away fairly easily. Less than a month ago, Ashwin had troubled England on another hard pitch that did not take much turn, picking up four wickets in the first innings of the Test series. At Edgbaston, Ashwin used a lot of revolutions on the ball and maintained slower speeds and consistent lengths to create the impact. Of course, the pitch was not as slow as the one in Southampton. Still there was enough wear and tear to play an influential hand. Incidentally, if you look at the continent-wide numbers for the average balls Ashwin takes to get his first wicket, Europe (so Tests in England) is the highest. Ashwin takes an average of 45.9 balls to get his first wicket in Europe compared to Africa (26.8), Asia (31.5), the Americas (31.4), and Australia (33.4). Finally, about an hour after the tea break, his first wicket arrived when Ashwin drifted a fuller delivery at nearly 54mph into Stokes, who stayed deep in his crease and edged to Ajinkya Rahane at slip. Ashwin charged towards Kohli at short midwicket and raised both his hands with a big smile, heaving a huge sigh of relief. It was a testing day for him. How much did the absence of Ravindra Jadeja at the other end hurt Ashwin and India? We will never know. But, surely, Jadeja could have perceivably had a bigger impact, as second spinner, than Hardik Pandya has had as a part-time seamer? If Jadeja was present, he could have shared the workload with Ashwin, who delivered 22 overs in an unbroken third spell that spanned the better part of the afternoon sessions. Would Ashwin have been more effective had he got a mini-break earlier in the day? Pujara disagreed when asked if Ashwin had a bad day at work. "I don't think he has bowled badly at all. But yes, the pitch has slowed down a lot and that could be the reason some of his balls didn't go through as much he might have wanted." Nonetheless Ashwin will be disappointed, to say the least, that he could not stand up to deliver telling blows to England and put India in a winning position. So how would Ashwin review his day? Link: http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/24547664/ashwin-misses-mark-worst-moment ============================== Pretty much confirmed what I said just after the England innings... I said he’ll fail in the second innings too... that’s exactly what happened... Here at ICF all of you rightly pointed out the technical issues he has and that’s been confirmed by this article...
  20. This stinks worse than a stale sambar fart...
  21. Maybe he should try Ludo or Monopoly instead of Carrom ball...
  22. General frustration at the state of Indian Cricket...
  23. At the moment any option is better than this constipated AH...
  24. Ash keeping tight.. only 49 runs taken off 23 overs...
  25. Hope they don’t blame Modi for this...

Guest, sign in to access all features.

×