Jump to content

Why has no action been taken against Rana Ayub?


Dil Dil India

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, mishra said:

Have you read the names of those foreign journalists? Check them one more time. Reuters, NYT, Bbc, al jazeera cnn ft. They all have a baggage or belong to particular community 

 

It does not matter what community they are, freedom of press is a must in any democracy.What is difference between India and China then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, putrevus said:

It does not matter what community they are, freedom of press is a must in any democracy.What is difference between India and China then.

They Are newsmakers and will write the same or even worse. Fact is everything. Police arresting/beating rioter or Terrorist shooting anyone who defies them or Mob throwing stones and burning police vehicles. Its what they think is important for their narrative, and they will cover that. Hence community and baggage of these reporters has to be factored before relying on them to give impartial news report.

 

You are right but that its Sad but Chinese are 100 times better at handling narrative. They have concentration camps called de radicalisation centre and there is no discussion. Same is for Xinxiang or other stuff.

Edited by mishra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/17/2019 at 5:50 PM, mishra said:

They Are newsmakers and will write the same or even worse. Fact is everything. Police arresting/beating rioter or Terrorist shooting anyone who defies them or Mob throwing stones and burning police vehicles. Its what they think is important for their narrative, and they will cover that. Hence community and baggage of these reporters has to be factored before relying on them to give impartial news report.

 

You are right but that its Sad but Chinese are 100 times better at handling narrative. They have concentration camps called de radicalisation centre and there is no discussion. Same is for Xinxiang or other stuff.

I totally understand the need for control but banning journalists due to their motives/narratives is wrong and that is not democracy is all about .Why are they afraid if they are not doing anything wrong and more importantly how long can they control the media.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, putrevus said:

I totally understand the need for control but banning journalists due to their motives/narratives is wrong and that is not democracy is all about .Why are they afraid if they are not doing anything wrong and more importantly how long can they control the media.

 

 

Yes agree, no need for any action, unless a law is broken. Till then, we should call out her seditious acts, hate for Hindus, bias in her Kashmir proclaims and hypocrisy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Yes agree, no need for any action, unless a law is broken. Till then, we should call out her seditious acts, hate for Hindus, bias in her Kashmir proclaims and hypocrisy.

No one should stop anyone from doing that, just like she has right to critique what she feels is wrong, Others also has equal right to do the same.

 

I totally understand it is easier said than done but let us not take it to extreme levels and become China.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, putrevus said:

I totally understand the need for control but banning journalists due to their motives/narratives is wrong and that is not democracy is all about .Why are they afraid if they are not doing anything wrong and more importantly how long can they control the media.

 

 

On India today Conclave, Ghulam Nabi was called out for his lie as jounalist interviewing mentioned that "Come on, We were there, shops started opening "half shutter" down just after week 1".

 

For article 370, It was Indian  PCI Journalist to call out on lies that were being peddled by foreign media. There was a reason why most Indian media was at loggerheads with bbc,cnn,trt,aljazeeraa. Now you can call whatever you want, press freedom or what not, But only reason TRT aljazeera press tv were speaking anti India was down to the deal Pakistan has got them into, to create a new  Islamic Brotherhood. Imran Khan did a U turn on Mahthir and Erdogan just day before yesterday despite having finalised most of stuff during his vist to US for UN meet. Some details coming out since the U turn.

 

So do you think GoI is wrong to stop these foreign interest who care a damn about Indians, to do instigation/radicalization of young minds,  which may result or resulted in attack on Indian Consulate overseas, Risk of attack on Indians overseas, Risk of terrorist attack in India, just in name of press freedom.

 

PS: Stopping journos visit a site is not same as controlling media, India has probably a media which is free and comparable to US media

 

 

Edited by mishra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, mishra said:

On India today Conclave, Ghulam Nabi was called out for his lie as jounalist interviewing mentioned that "Come on, We were there, shops started opening "half shutter" down just after week 1".

 

For article 370, It was Indian  PCI Journalist to call out on lies that were being peddled by foreign media. There was a reason why most Indian media was at loggerheads with bbc,cnn,trt,aljazeeraa. Now you can call whatever you want, press freedom or what not, But only reason TRT aljazeera press tv were speaking anti India was down to the deal Pakistan has got them into, to create a new  Islamic Brotherhood. Imran Khan did a U turn on Mahthir and Erdogan just day before yesterday despite having finalised most of stuff during his vist to US for UN meet. Some details coming out since the U turn.

 

So do you think GoI is wrong to stop these foreign interest who care a damn about Indians, to do instigation/radicalization of young minds,  which may result or resulted in attack on Indian Consulate overseas, Risk of attack on Indians overseas, Risk of terrorist attack in India, just in name of press freedom.

 

PS: Stopping journos visit a site is not same as controlling media, India has probably a media which is free and comparable to US media

 

 

Do you think by stopping them , they are going to change their narratives, This lady who smuggled a forgeign journalist might be total sham but have we given her ammunition to do so.

 

My view is if you want to ban media , ban complete media till you feel as a govt, situation is under control.Govt first duty is maintaining law and order nobody denies it.Tell the world yes we need more time to get things in order, everyone will understand and support.Those who don't support let them go to hell.

 

Article 370 was the biggest sham Nehru pulled over India.If he had let Patel do his job like he did all over India, he would nipped this issue in 1948 itself.But he was playing politics like he did all his life.Patel ended 565 princely states but he forgot he was letting Nehru create one empire which is still ruling India to some extent .Every time I see her face on TV, I feel how wrong Mahatma Gandhi was in letting Nehru become first PM.Are we Indians so useless that we need one foreigner to lead one of biggest national parties.

 

 I was so happy BJP corrected this wrong.But are we not giving ammunition to the world that we are turning India into a hindu state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ Her position or other media house like NYT, WaPo, BBC,TRT,Aljazera's positions or position of any Islamist covering Asia for big media houses of West is not going to change irrespective of whether they are allowed or not allowed. Their position is being driven by national Interest of that country, which is stoking violence in region.

Government could have allowed RT journos in the area as national interest of India and Russia in case of Kashmir, are aligned, but it couldnt have justified it.

 

I dont mind Indian journalists, including B Dutt and her followers to report because they have no such obligation apart from not accepting present Indian government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Saba Naqvi is also turning out to be another Rana. Sab ek tarah hain when it comes to Muslim victimhood pov.

Her father is a hardcore extremist, Saba was always vicious but managed to temper her views to get invited to Times Now, Republic. 

 

But don't think there can be another Rana, even Arundhati Roy isn't that rabid. What are our agencies doing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time she opens her mouth or writes something, FAKE NEWS

 

Even some sane Congressis are calling her out now.

The video she shared is an old one from Bihar, when gathbandhan was in power. 

 

Edited by Gollum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...