Jump to content

Are Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi discriminated against for being christian?


Manny_Pacquiao

Is raj mata being discriminated against for being christian?  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Is raj mata being discriminated against for being christian?



Recommended Posts

If Sonia gandhi wasn't a catholic from italy, would she be taken more seriously as a political voice?

 

Her son rahul, the crown prince of India (according to the BBC), proclaimed himself a janeudhari brahmin: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/rahul-gandhis-gotra-is-dattatreya-he-is-kashmiri-brahmin-priest/articleshow/66820708.cms

 

His 'claim' wasn't taken seriously, as his great-grandfather was a muslim (so the story goes), and he eventually shifted his constituency from Amethi, to muslim-majority Wayanad in kerala.

 

The question i have for you guys:

 

Is it possible for India to have a non-hindu led political front? Can the congress exist as a credible opposition while its being led by two foreign christians?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Manny_Pacquiao said:

If Sonia gandhi wasn't a catholic from italy, would she be taken more seriously as a political voice?

 

Her son rahul, the crown prince of India (according to the BBC), proclaimed himself a janeudhari brahmin: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/rahul-gandhis-gotra-is-dattatreya-he-is-kashmiri-brahmin-priest/articleshow/66820708.cms

 

His 'claim' wasn't taken seriously, as his great-grandfather was a muslim (so the story goes), and he eventually shifted his constituency from Amethi, to muslim-majority Wayanad in kerala.

 

The question i have for you guys:

 

Is it possible for India to have a non-hindu led political front? Can the congress exist as a credible opposition while its being led by two foreign christians?

He didn't shift his constituency. He lost from amethi and fought from 2 constituencies. Also, congress was in power for ten years with sonia leading?

Edited by rkt.india
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

He didn't shift his constituency. He lost from amethi and fought from 2 constituencies. Also, congress was in power for ten years with sonia leading?

My mistake. i thought he simply left amethi. Either way, his janeudhari brahmin claim wasn't taken seriously.

 

and was sonia really "leading" if she had to make manmohan singh the PM? why couldn't she rule with an absolute majority and be the face of the party, like modi?

 

I'm referring to their public image. In both cases, Christianity seems to be the defining factor. either they themselves feel they cannot rule india as 'christians', or they weren't allowed to by the indian electorate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stan AF said:

Other news, water is wet.

So discriminated that they were virtually running the govt for 10 years and before that Sonia was key player during Vajpayee era

So discriminated that this was the respect shown towards MMS by tearing an ordinance in a press meet, no apology, nothing

So discriminated that these 2 have been Presidents of INC since 1998 allowing no other candidate or even election List of presidents of the Indian National Congress

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gollum said:

4th/5th gen of a dynasty that has ruled for most part

Thieves

No loyalty to India

etc.

 

Waise Sonia was de facto queen during UPA regime, Manmohan was a rubber stamp. 

Not sure how many remember,  but in 2004 she was offered the PM post and there was a huge outcry 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So discriminated that they were partying on an aircraft carrier which was specifically summoned for their recreation, picnic...

'Rajiv And Sonia Gandhi Used INS Viraat For Travel To Celebrate Their Holidays. I Am Witness,' Confirms Commander VK Jaitly (retd.)

 

So discriminated, imagine the reaction if Modi's face is morphed on some Jesus poster

Painting portraying Sonia as goddess Durga creates flutter | India ...

 

For the loot that family has indulged in, they should spend the rest of their lives in prison. Sonia and her son-in-law in particular must be hanged. But alas, age old lack of killer instinct once again displayed by dharmics. 

Edited by Gollum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, diga said:

Not sure how many remember,  but in 2004 she was offered the PM post and there was a huge outcry 

Of course there was, she isn't Indian born. President Abdul Kalam said the same, is he Hindutvawadi as well? 

 

Arnold Schwarzenegger couldn't run for US Presidency because he is Austrian born LINK, US is 250 yo democracy and a land of immigrants. 

 

Natural born citizens different from those born overseas. It should be that way, otherwise will open a  Pandora's box. 

 

Religion didn't have anything to do with the 2004 outcry. Difference between a George Fernandes and Sonia is clear to everybody. Tomorrow if Jagan and Oommen Chandy want to run for PM post what is the problem?

Edited by Gollum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, diga said:

Not sure how many remember,  but in 2004 she was offered the PM post and there was a huge outcry 

The SC would’ve stopped it.
 

Reg OP , how so? Discrimination is when they show competence and are not recognized or given importance despite talent. It is the other way around for the Mainos. They are privileged and entitled when they have zilch competence and garbage as talent

 

2 hours ago, Manny_Pacquiao said:

 

Is it possible for India to have a non-hindu led political front? Can the congress exist as a credible opposition while its being led by two foreign

India has many leaders who are non-Hindu, dhimmis who are afraid to call themselves openly Hindu. Congress has lost cred because these two are incompetent and there is no other leader , all namards and sycophants

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Gollum said:

Of course there was, she isn't Indian born. President Abdul Kalam said the same, is he Hindutvawadi as well? 

 

Arnold Schwarzenegger couldn't run for US Presidency because he is Austrian born LINK, US is 250 yo democracy and a land of immigrants. 

 

Natural born citizens different from those born overseas. It should be that way, otherwise will open a  Pandora's box. 

 

Religion didn't have anything to do with the 2004 outcry. Difference between a George Fernandes and Sonia is clear to everybody. Tomorrow if Jagan and Oommen Chandy want to run for PM post what is the problem?

Bhai I agree with the gist of your posts but a slight correction there. American Constitution specifically mentions that only those citizens who were born in the USA are eligible to become president while there's no constitutional obligation in India. 

But yeah the uproar over Sonia was mainly because she was a foreigner who couldn't even properly speak the language of her adopted country. otherwise we have had charlatans like AK Antony as defence minister. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...