ash

Not at all surprised.
 
The union government here doesn't care about all this and instead keeps digging under mosques to hide from real problems.
 
 

More proof that travelling does not really improve intelligence. Maybe time to revisit facts 
 
1) No Indian Empire has ruled the entire subcontinent. India was never under one rule 
2) No proof in Tamil literature about Bharat, India or Akhanda or whatever.
3) No proof whatsoever in any South Indian literature about a United Hindu population across the country.
 
Bring back facts, or keep languishing in Bigotry and Ignorance.

First and second tamil sangam literature is lost, so not sure about the religions. Archeological evidence in Keezhadi does not have any Religious artificers yet.  From the third tamil sangam - Shaivism and Vaishnavism were major religions.
 
But there was no kinship with the rest if India in any literature, again proving my point that language was the unifying factor 
 
 

Sadly you have to spent your entire life whinning and crying while listening to Hanuman chalisa and Ramayana in India . Looks like your family trolled you badly in childhood while they sent you in a school where havan and ardhana were performed everyday . Being a Hindu even I never went to such schools. But all the best TN will always be proudest state of India and never associate itself with any other neighbouring countries which you might be wishing every second Ashraful.

lol. RW tactics is just to assume what the other person’s ideology is and attack them, instead of arguing with facts.
 
Marxist, LTTE sympathisers and now apparently I am a Muslim. Lol. 
 
You can quote quoran and abuse it as much as you want, I am an atheist so I would enjoy it. But I also have the common sense to understand that I can dig deep into Hindu literature and find the same kind of problematic statements. I consider all Holy Books be it Vedas or Bible or Quoran as same. A bunch of guidelines written by men 1000s of years ago to suit their time, which mankind is foolish enough to follow even now. 

Ashfaq / Ashraf / Ashrafullah     - whatever your real name is.....democracy is also there to correct historical wrongs that have been done with the majority.
 
Babri masjid was not actively used for prayers, yet in a 80 % Hindu majority country, at the most sacred site of Hinduism the peacefuls had no sensitivity towards this fact, infact they had the KHUJLI to pretend as if Babur was some sufi saint not a barbaric invader.
 
How would muslims react if a mandir was planted on the Kabbah site after bulldozing it ?
 
The million dollar question for all muslims who love secularism when they are in minority is -
 
Pray..what kind of secularism is displayed in the the holy book that divides the world info believers and non- believers, says the non-believers will roast in hell, convert non-believers or make them pay Jizya.....What kind of secularism is this ?
 
It is a ironic that while Islam is inherently unsecular, peacefuls talk about secularism from the rooftops wherever they are a minority.
 
Everyone of the manmade Abrahamic religions including Islam ...has a "start date",  the story is the same always.... there was a chosen "prophet" who was made the messenger of god and revelations were made. 
 
None of the scriptures  have ever been able to trace the origins of Sanatana Dharma....when it originated.  It is timeless, it has existed forever...just like the universe. 
 
Sanatana Dhrama is  the only "true" way of life,  unlike some man made frauds done a few 1000 -2000 years back. 
 
 
 
 
 

banjo "shaivism" "vaishnavism", but no 'connection' with rest of Bharat or Hinduism.  I mean, the height of moronic blinkers.  
 
I have a lot of time for atheists, and agree with much of what most atheists' critique of religion. But fools with delusion arrogance of superiority often feed such 'facts' to themselves.  

Lol man, Marxist and now LTTE eh. I am neither , in fact I am against them and their ideology.
 
atleast the other guy was trying to argue something, but you on the other hand. But yeah I understand, you need to know something to argue. You don’t have that the only weapon you have is name calling 

There is a mosque for every 3 temples in India and there are total 7 Lacs mosques. 
 

Just so you know, the first constitutional democratic republic in the milky way was the Atheist Tambi Republic of Periyarland Eelam with Lord Velupillai Prabhakaran as its founding father. Unfortunately the Aryan invasion destroyed all it's monuments 

Again, no cherry picking and nothing assumed here. Have laid down facts, and I am the only one doing so. You are just explaining your wet dreams. India is also a modern nation state, and without British colonisation, we would have been a bunch of smaller countries. Every historical record before the britishers point to this fact.
 
Ironically, RW has to thank the Britishers cause without the, India as a concept would have been a pipe dream.  I am done with you. Anyone else please.

More proof that travelling does not really improve intelligence. Maybe time to revisit facts 
 
1) No Indian Empire has ruled the entire subcontinent. India was never under one rule 
2) No proof in Tamil literature about Bharat, India or Akhanda or whatever.
3) No proof whatsoever in any South Indian literature about a United Hindu population across the country.
 
Bring back facts, or keep languishing in Bigotry and Ignorance.

First and second tamil sangam literature is lost, so not sure about the religions. Archeological evidence in Keezhadi does not have any Religious artificers yet.  From the third tamil sangam - Shaivism and Vaishnavism were major religions.
 
But there was no kinship with the rest if India in any literature, again proving my point that language was the unifying factor 
 
 

First and second tamil sangam literature is lost, so not sure about the religions. Archeological evidence in Keezhadi does not have any Religious artificers yet.  From the third tamil sangam - Shaivism and Vaishnavism were major religions.
 
But there was no kinship with the rest if India in any literature, again proving my point that language was the unifying factor 
 
 

Nope, none of the sangam era Tamil literature acknowledges the Idea of Bharath. Did they know about other parts of the subcontinent? Sure , a landmass not separated by Sea would obviously have trade routes and travellers but the literature always mentions them like other countries and not part of their kingdom. 
 
 Konkani people (Konganar), Kannadigas (Karunadar), Odiyas (Kalingar), Bengalis (Bangalar) and northern India (vada Aryar).

Lol, everything shared here in the forum is a personal anecdote, from their POV. Does every Hindu in India want the temple to be built, any data to back this up? The frogs are just croaking from the Madura well aren’t they? 
 
Language is obviously a greater unifying force than Religion in South from what I have observed and what the polls indicate. 
 

You mean the sheer number quoted as 60000 temples by Hindutva without no data to back it up? 
 
There is no official data to compare, your mind just imagines that the scale is huge because the Mughals are “bad”. There are similar examples of Hindu kings plundering Buddhist temples, other Hindu temples etc.  Pandyas , Pallavas, Guptas, Cholas have all done this, the Pandyas plundered Buddhist temples in Srilanka.
 
As I said, that is how Conquests used to be. And this is what a democracy is supposed to protect from happening.  If we start destroying mosques, it just means that what we have is not a democracy and the Muslims are basically living in a Hindu Kingdom.

Already told I am not a Marxist, but if you insist on it, fine. At least Marx was a real person , not an imaginary character like Krishna. 

Nope, none of the sangam era Tamil literature acknowledges the Idea of Bharath. Did they know about other parts of the subcontinent? Sure , a landmass not separated by Sea would obviously have trade routes and travellers but the literature always mentions them like other countries and not part of their kingdom. 
 
 Konkani people (Konganar), Kannadigas (Karunadar), Odiyas (Kalingar), Bengalis (Bangalar) and northern India (vada Aryar).

Already told I am not a Marxist, but if you insist on it, fine. At least Marx was a real person , not an imaginary character like Krishna. 

Lol, everything shared here in the forum is a personal anecdote, from their POV. Does every Hindu in India want the temple to be built, any data to back this up? The frogs are just croaking from the Madura well aren’t they? 
 
Language is obviously a greater unifying force than Religion in South from what I have observed and what the polls indicate. 
 

You mean the sheer number quoted as 60000 temples by Hindutva without no data to back it up? 
 
There is no official data to compare, your mind just imagines that the scale is huge because the Mughals are “bad”. There are similar examples of Hindu kings plundering Buddhist temples, other Hindu temples etc.  Pandyas , Pallavas, Guptas, Cholas have all done this, the Pandyas plundered Buddhist temples in Srilanka.
 
As I said, that is how Conquests used to be. And this is what a democracy is supposed to protect from happening.  If we start destroying mosques, it just means that what we have is not a democracy and the Muslims are basically living in a Hindu Kingdom.

In India , Language unites people more than Religion. A Tamil or Malayalam Hindu would definitely feel closer to a Tamil/Malayalam Christian/Muslim than a UP or Bihar Hindu. Food, Pop culture, Locality etc etc plays a part. 
 

The same point again. If you take a census in Europe, most of them would be Christians. but Is it an uniting factor?
 
Is there any data that before British rule, Indian kingdoms were divided based on religion? We were basically separate countries when the Britishers came here, united by Language more than anything else. Separate  small countries with its own cuisine, culture , language and identity

I do feel sad for the Hindutva NRIs. They are writing long articles about Reviving lost Hindutva glory while their son/daughter is probably out there dating a white guy/girl and will later become a complete Western product. Forget about reviving Hindutva, their own Hindu heritage would probably end with them. 

almost all European countries follow Christianity, so can they can be considered as a single country? India was never a single country before the British rule, that is a fact.