diga Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 BTW which lawyer filed the application in SC for UNHCR? Hindus should summarily boycott the lawyer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raki05 Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 2 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said: What absolute and utter nonsense. The CAA is discriminatory. Your heart bleeds for persecuted minorities but your humanity disappears when it comes to persecuted Muslims. The fact that there is a state sponsored bill that denies asylum to persecuted minorities simply based on their religion is despicable. This is the simple reason why people are against the CAA. End of story. Absolutely it's religion based why should Muslims from Pak/Bd and afg should get asylum in India when they were formed on religion. Minorities in those countries have no persecution rights. FischerTal, Turning_track and Gollum 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raki05 Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 2 hours ago, First class said: Get rid of this Chayewala, save India Get lost to your pervert prime minister lap. Laaloo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetle Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 Have they ever thought of doing the same in Pakistan ,the way they treat their minorities there. Gollum and Alam_dar 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 2 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said: the fact that there is a state sponsored bill that denies asylum to persecuted minorities this is a blatant lie. CAA is for asylum seekers who obviously are therefore not Indian citizens. Its for asylum seekers from Muslims majority countries where Muslims who are the source of persecution are majority. @EnterTheVoid appears to be a spreader of lies. Laaloo, diga, Adi_91 and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 52 minutes ago, diga said: BTW which lawyer filed the application in SC for UNHCR? Hindus should summarily boycott the lawyer who is bothered man SC with quash it. Look below who this UN HRC has. The 2020 UN Human Rights Council opened this week. Members include: Pakistan — death penalty for 'blasphemers' Somalia — death penalty for gays Sudan — same Mauritania — has 500,000 slaves Venezuela — Maduro tyranny Qatar — enslaves migrants Libya — same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted March 3, 2020 Author Share Posted March 3, 2020 Laaloo, Stradlater, Turning_track and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, Stradlater said: How many persecuted muslims from the said 3 countries have sought refuge in India? They are welcome too, CAA doesn’t say they will not allow Muslims persecuted in Pak. It will take a longer time for them than Non-Muslims. These woke libtards in foreign countries read opEds and regurgitate their libtard idols’ opinions. Edited March 3, 2020 by coffee_rules Gollum, Laaloo, Clarke and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 lol Gollum, veer and Laaloo 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 lol hehe this guy is UN HRC FischerTal and Laaloo 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) We could save such humans if human rights commision wouldn’t oppose. Human hi nahin hain to Human rights kaise Bachaoge? p.s to @EnterTheVoid who is preventing such asylum seekers to be alive and not getting killed Edited March 4, 2020 by coffee_rules Stradlater and Gollum 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MechEng Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 2 hours ago, someone said: Its inevitable if India wants to be a superpower. There will be conflicts, possible intervention by western interests. Hopefully, like Russia & China, India is strong enough internally to resist such biased institutions, and protect its own interests... Although, We still are struck with western validation, and so its a big moment for our SC. If they do not reject such foreign intervention, its opens many dangerous implications... This is the watershed moment, if India remains assertive it would indirectly signal the decline of western powers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MechEng Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 1 hour ago, Vilander said: lol Oh! Then it's alright and nothing to worry about. I thought it was EU countries first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 No strong country would worry about this esp. when you look at many of the council members, who are hardly to be taken seriously This is a joke Stradlater 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alam_dar Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 2 hours ago, beetle said: Have they ever thought of doing the same in Pakistan ,the way they treat their minorities there. I am all for that. Role of UN should be increased and more and more powers should be given to UN. Hopefully, it would one day end the wars and disputes in the world completely. UN should challenge the Blasphemy laws in Islamic countries which are the main weapon against the minorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetle Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 2 hours ago, Vilander said: who is bothered man SC with quash it. Look below who this UN HRC has. The 2020 UN Human Rights Council opened this week. Members include: Pakistan — death penalty for 'blasphemers' Somalia — death penalty for gays Sudan — same Mauritania — has 500,000 slaves Venezuela — Maduro tyranny Qatar — enslaves migrants Libya — same Wtf! Seriously!!!! Don't these countries have any shame ! Doesn't UN have any shame? Bloody UN is nothing but a piece of crappy joke. Stradlater 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alam_dar Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 5 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said: The CAA is discriminatory. Your heart bleeds for persecuted minorities but your humanity disappears when it comes to persecuted Muslims. The fact that there is a state sponsored bill that denies asylum to persecuted minorities simply based on their religion is despicable. This is the simple reason why people are against the CAA. End of story. To be true the protests are not about the persecuted Muslims in Islamic countries and their getting asylum in India. Actually these protests in India are not taking place due to CAA, but it is about the "wicked combination" of "CAA+NRC" that Indian Muslim+Secularists are protesting about. The intentional plan is to make Indian Muslims "stateless" through NRC, but to give others citizenship again through CAA (except for Indian Muslims). I know the evils of Muslim communities for not integrating with others. Despite this, still I don't think that going to this much extreme is necessary, while Indian Muslims don't pose that much danger. The response from the majority Indian Hindus is not appropriate. This out of balance reaction by Indian Hindus will push all the liberal Indian Muslims towards extremism too. Actually, I don't see that Hindu Religion has the potential TODAY to absorb other religions in it. The followers of other religion feel no attraction in it. In fact the younger Hindu generations themselves are going away from the religion themselves and feeling no attraction in it's practices any more. Only platform which is attractive enough that every one could join it and live peacefully and happily, it belongs to the Secularism. Laaloo and Clarke 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 4 minutes ago, Alam_dar said: This out of balance reaction by Indian Hindus will push all the liberal Indian Muslims towards extremism too. Actually, I don't see that Hindu Religion has the potential TODAY to absorb other religions in it. The followers of other religion feel no attraction in it. In fact the younger Hindu generations themselves are going away from the religion themselves and feeling no attraction in it's practices any more. Only platform which is attractive enough that every one could join it and live peacefully and happily, it belongs to the Secularism. That's seriously wrong. It's the Indian Hindus who have to react to safeguard themselves, which is partly due to the inaction or deafening silence of liberal Muslims towards the extremists violent actions. Hindu religion has a history of absorbing different cultures and religions. Yet, there are some foreign religions which are hostile so it's obvious Hindus have to fight such challenge. Just denying the problem, will not the solve it. And Secularism is a 2-ways, especially when the other side is not displaying mutual respect. Gollum and Alam_dar 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motomaverick Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) Honestly, whoever wants to preach secularism to us, we should just grow a pair and tell them to fcuk off. Just like this gentleman who says - "We won't have Muslims in our country because that keeps us safe". Let the libtards squeal, who cares? Edited March 3, 2020 by motomaverick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 1 hour ago, MechEng said: Oh! Then it's alright and nothing to worry about. I thought it was EU countries first. there is germany and netherland and India in the group currently i guess getting out in 2021. but majority are banana republics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts