Refugees mass at Greek border as fighting between Turkey, Syria heats up

[R!TTER]

22 hours ago, LordPrabhzy said:

All these refugees are heading to the UK.. they will not want to stop in any EU country.

I doubt that, given the number of uninvited migrants in France & especially Germany they'd rather be there than the nation which wanted its (remote) control back 

[Vickydev]

8 minutes ago, Norman said:

First it was Germany by Turks and Syrians/Iraqis. 

 

Then Britain by Pakistanis and Arabs. 

 

France by North Africans. 

 

And now Greece and Cyprus....

 

Europe is going to the dogs....

It's these Europeans who in the 18th century started messing with the rest of the world which led to their enrichment. They have exploited the resources, both human and material, esp of Africa, ME, Sub Continent, China, South America. They are reaping what they sowed. I have no sympathy for those barbarians. 

Note: Its unfortunate that the Greeks are just caught in the crossfire, the refugees don't even want to stay there AFAIK. They themselves have suffered to these imperialist for which Cyprus is not a Greek island. F**k the west.

[Mariyam]

On 3/6/2020 at 2:29 AM, coffee_rules said:

Can't understand why can't they walk over across the border and settle down in Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia. Why are they dying in the seas to go live in EU?

Same reason many Indians didn't walk across the border and settle in 'dharmic' Nepal, Bhutan or Burma but chose to work in the USA.

 

Opportunity at a better life. 

[coffee_rules]

5 hours ago, Mariyam said:

Same reason many Indians didn't walk across the border and settle in 'dharmic' Nepal, Bhutan or Burma but chose to work in the USA.

 

Opportunity at a better life. 

Are you  are comparing refugees to economic migrants? If there was a calamitous war in India, most Hindus will move to Nepal or Bhutan rather than clamoring  to cheat death and try to take asylum in the west. Most Hindus in Pak and Bangladesh in 47/71 moved to India as refugees and didn’t knock on the doors of the west.

 

The  answer to my original question is that these oil rich Islamic nations don’t want these refugees and have closed doors on them.

Edited March 7, 2020 by coffee_rules

[Gollum]

Saudi Arabia is a huge country, filthy rich. Why can't they take in Muslim refugees from Myanmar, Syria, Iraq etc? 

[Mariyam]

Its cute how people here are suddenly so concerned about the future of Europe.

 

People who have a losing head to head against Muslim invaders for the better part of the last 1000 years are eager to 'open the eyes' of Europeans, the same Europeans who colonised the Muslim world as recently as 80 years ago, to the threat of Islamic migration/invasions. Give the Europeans some credit, they may know a thing or two about handling Islamic invasions. 

 

Apart from how to rage on the internet, what can the Europeans learn from this lot?

Edited March 23, 2020 by Mariyam

[Mariyam]

On 3/7/2020 at 6:56 PM, coffee_rules said:

Are you  are comparing refugees to economic migrants? If there was a calamitous war in India, most Hindus will move to Nepal or Bhutan rather than clamoring  to cheat death and try to take asylum in the west. Most Hindus in Pak and Bangladesh in 47/71 moved to India as refugees and didn’t knock on the doors of the west.

 

The  answer to my original question is that these oil rich Islamic nations don’t want these refugees and have closed doors on them.

After Idi Amin started nationalising industry in Uganda, most of the Indian migrants (even first generation) chose to go to the UK over returning to India.

The Roma/Gypsies from northern India migrated to Europe.  

Lot of Indians, even today, risk their lives to travel to the UK/USA.

 

A simple google search will show you that most Syrian refugees are in the neighbouring nations of Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon. Some wish to move to Western societies for better opportunities. Why is this very surprising?