Jump to content

Pandya’s finishing (in cricket) skills tracker


maniac

Recommended Posts

Pandya was decent when he came in 2016..  Played a crucial cameo in Asia Cup.  Won us an ODI vs Australia too but since then the downward spiral started.  Cameos were not coming at a regular basis.  In T20s he was absolute trash.  CT final knock should've helped him to take it to another level but wasn't to be.  With this new stance even Pandya of 2016 is head & shoulders above the new one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have not seen the growth of Pandya as a cricketer in last 4 years.We could overlook all stats if we had seen his growth. He is neither a batsman who can bowl a bit nor a bowler who can bat bit.

 

In my view he should play one full season of domestic cricket, bowl as many overs as possible and bat higher in order. Improve as a cricketer and then comeback.This lure of allrounder tempts all teams as they strive for the elusive balance. But Pandya is not that player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, putrevus said:

We have not seen the growth of Pandya as a cricketer in last 4 years.We could overlook all stats if we had seen his growth. He is neither a batsman who can bowl a bit nor a bowler who can bat bit.

 

In my view he should play one full season of domestic cricket, bowl as many overs as possible and bat higher in order. Improve as a cricketer and then comeback.This lure of allrounder tempts all teams as they strive for the elusive balance. But Pandya is not that player.

What about his 90???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, putrevus said:

We have not seen the growth of Pandya as a cricketer in last 4 years.We could overlook all stats if we had seen his growth. He is neither a batsman who can bowl a bit nor a bowler who can bat bit.

 

In my view he should play one full season of domestic cricket, bowl as many overs as possible and bat higher in order. Improve as a cricketer and then comeback.This lure of allrounder tempts all teams as they strive for the elusive balance. But Pandya is not that player.

Weakest link as bowler, iffy batsman. Hasn't moved up from promising category to accomplished category. SL's Angelo Mathews started as a bits and pieces player and developed into a proper batsman. Watto also developed into a proper batsman who could open the innings. Hardik seems destined to remain a work in progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about his 90???

Stuart Binny took 6/7 , did that make him an allrounder. One odd 90 or one odd 5fer does not make Pandya an allrounder.To play in the team he needs to contribute either with bat or bowl every match.

 

Kapil Dev worked for India because he was the best fast bowler in his team for majority of his career.His batting was always bonus.Moreover he was a trail blazer who gave  path to many others. Pandya is not even patch of what kapil Dev was after his 4 years in the team.

 

Dhoni worked as a finisher in odis because he could score runs from no5 or no6 and had ability to score 100 from that position.His primary job was keeping, which unlike Rahul he never gave up even when he was very very good with bat.

 

You don't need a hit and miss cricketer in the team. Pandya is more miss with both bat and ball .

Edited by putrevus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, nevada said:

Weakest link as bowler, iffy batsman. Hasn't moved up from promising category to accomplished category. SL's Angelo Mathews started as a bits and pieces player and developed into a proper batsman. Watto also developed into a proper batsman who could open the innings. Hardik seems destined to remain a work in progress.

Exactly, you needed to see the growth of Pandya but he has not shown that growth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Btw have u thought who ll bat at 7 instead of him ?

At no 7 I want a strike bowler who could contribute little bit. I am not expecting much from 7.

5 top bats

1 wkt kpr (Pant etc.)

5 strike bowler (jaddu being one of those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Stuart Binny took 6/7 , did that make him an allrounder. One odd 90 or one odd 5fer does not make Pandya an allrounder.To play in the team he needs to contribute either with bat or bowl every match.

 

Kapil Dev worked for India because he was the best fast bowler in his team for majority of his career.His batting was always bonus.Moreover he was a trail blazer who gave  path to many others. Pandya is not even patch of what kapil Dev was after his 4 years in the team.

 

Dhoni worked as a finisher in odis because he could score runs from no5 or no6 and had ability to score 100 from that position.His primary job was keeping, which unlike Rahul he never gave up even when he was very very good with bat.

 

You don't need a hit and miss cricketer in the team. Pandya is more miss with both bat and ball .

That exactly made Kapil so important.

Pandya contributes zilch with bowling but his fans are asking us to be patient. I get irritated because microwave takes too long a time. half a decade of failuure is enough.

Binny, Pandya, Shankar when is enough truly enough??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Exactly, you needed to see the growth of Pandya but he has not shown that growth. 

 

42 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Stuart Binny took 6/7 , did that make him an allrounder. One odd 90 or one odd 5fer does not make Pandya an allrounder.To play in the team he needs to contribute either with bat or bowl every match.

 

Kapil Dev worked for India because he was the best fast bowler in his team for majority of his career.His batting was always bonus.Moreover he was a trail blazer who gave  path to many others. Pandya is not even patch of what kapil Dev was after his 4 years in the team.

 

Dhoni worked as a finisher in odis because he could score runs from no5 or no6 and had ability to score 100 from that position.His primary job was keeping, which unlike Rahul he never gave up even when he was very very good with bat.

 

You don't need a hit and miss cricketer in the team. Pandya is more miss with both bat and ball .

 

Five years invested in him and nothing to show for.

WC invested on Shankar and nothing to show for.

When will this madness end?? 

Kindly respond @Ankit_sharma03

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khota said:

 

 

Five years invested in him and nothing to show for.

WC invested on Shankar and nothing to show for.

When will this madness end?? 

Kindly respond @Ankit_sharma03

 

how 5 yrs ...he debut in 2016, this is 2020 which is is gone with almost no cricket

2018-19 was injury for him

 

If anything he hasnt done anything go watch cricket

 

Investment is 5 yrs ...shankar got injured he was decent in his chances

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khota said:

That exactly made Kapil so important.

Pandya contributes zilch with bowling but his fans are asking us to be patient. I get irritated because microwave takes too long a time. half a decade of failuure is enough.

Binny, Pandya, Shankar when is enough truly enough??

Giving these bits and pieces players undeserving chances is making mockery of Indian cap. Stuart Binny should never have played test cricket, that guy is as useless as they come.His dad was 1000 times better than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khota said:

At no 7 I want a strike bowler who could contribute little bit. I am not expecting much from 7.

5 top bats

1 wkt kpr (Pant etc.)

5 strike bowler (jaddu being one of those)

 

5 top bats and 1 keeper

1 bowler

 

so what happens if one our bowler is going for heavy runs or gets injured on field like bhuvi in India-pak game in Wc or Zak in 2011 england game....whats ur plan ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Rasgulla said:

Totally out of form :whack:

 

Not out of form but needs to be careful initially .... Has played his part in 5-6/7 games 

 

Unless the thread assume that SDP has to score a 50+ score everytime he comes out to bat, I do not know what it about :lol: 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Rasgulla said:

Totally out of form :whack:

this is not out of form, when he comes into bat he wont score more then 30s-40s 

these wkts havent been easy for hitting specially when u come late and have to do that job from ball 1, even russell have struggled

 

Out of form is when u cant middle the ball, dont know where ur off stump is, dont know if u have to go on front or back foot . 

What happened to rahul 1-2 yrs ago was out of form

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The magic of SDP :hatsoff: 

 

  • IPL 2019: Best player for MI w/ 400+ runs at a SR of 190+ and 14 wkt
  • WC19:

In 7 out of 9 games: 

 

15* v SA, SR 214

48 v Aus, SR 178

26 v Pak, SR 137

46 v WI, SR 121

45 v Eng, SR 136

7* v SL, SR 175

32 v NZ, SR 52 

 

The above is a good performance (Avg 44, SR 115) from a lower middle order impact player  (for reference - Tendulkar avgs 30 w/ a SR of 86 when batting at 5 to 7) .... If we talk about the group games, his avg goes up to 47 and SR to 146 (in 6 out of 8 group games). The games where he failed were v AFG and BD (2 out of 8 group games)

 

 

  • IPL 2020: Playing his part 

     

     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...