Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Vikings upto Ragnar was gold.  After that it went downhill.  The Paris invasion is Top tier Action TV not even GoT can surpass that season 

The last Kingdom on Netflix is better from start to finish imo story and character development wise.  Covers later Vikings + Saxon resistance.

 

There is also Marco Polo on Netflix which covers Mongol rule in China it was perhaps as costly and massive as GoT.  Only 2 seasons though. Totally worth it 

 

Somehow never liked English history that much. Very boring compared to others. My fav is the Roman Republic era.

 

I like Indian history as well - but well written stuff is mostly around the Mughals. We hardly have anything of that quality about our own empires. 

Posted
55 minutes ago, bharathh said:

 

Somehow never liked English history that much. Very boring compared to others. My fav is the Roman Republic era.

 

I like Indian history as well - but well written stuff is mostly around the Mughals. We hardly have anything of that quality about our own empires. 

Do you like game of thrones? Because it's hugely inspired by english history 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, bharathh said:

 

Somehow never liked English history that much. Very boring compared to others. My fav is the Roman Republic era.

 

I like Indian history as well - but well written stuff is mostly around the Mughals. We hardly have anything of that quality about our own empires. 

Last Kingdom is anything but boring.  English history I agree is boring subject but if you liked Vikings then The last Kingdom is a notch above when it comes to storytelling.

 

Spartacus I have only watched 1 season.

 

HBO's Rome starring Ray Stevenson is also Top Tier TV.  It was expensive af & laid the groundwork for shows like GoT later on.

 

We don't have lot of written knowledge about OG Indian Empires mostly foreign sources & folk tales.   They don't make anything engaging or concrete.

Edited by Lone Wolf
Posted
43 minutes ago, New guy said:

Do you like game of thrones? Because it's hugely inspired by english history 

 

War of Roses - snooze. 

 

Game of Thrones (the first 2 books - great!) After that the books get boring too. The series was great because of the visuals.

Posted
16 hours ago, kepler37b said:

@coffee_rules @Gollum @Mariyam ..you guys seen this show called "Shogun"? How is it?

The Mr recommended we watch this. I gave it a miss. It is in Japanese, and I am not a fan of subtitles.

 

Also it is from the 1500-1600s. 

 

I am interested in contemporary Japanese society/ literature. Not all this samurai stuff.

Posted
1 hour ago, bharathh said:

 

War of Roses - snooze. 

 

Game of Thrones (the first 2 books - great!) After that the books get boring too. The series was great because of the visuals.

Is that the Imperial British endeavour that they started on Valentine's day?

Posted
1 hour ago, bharathh said:

 

War of Roses - snooze. 

 

Game of Thrones (the first 2 books - great!) After that the books get boring too. The series was great because of the visuals.

Surely the third one was the best, everything happens in the third one after set up of first two, the red wedding, the purple wedding, tyrions trial and escape, entire oberyn story, tywins death, jon snow becoming commander, jamies redemption arc, lady stone heart and so much more 

Posted
1 hour ago, Vicks57 said:

 

I stopped Vikings after Ragnar's death.

 

Tbh, when the focus shifted from Ragnar to his sons, I tunes off.

 

Bjorn and rest of Ragnar's sons with Aslaug are so boring.

 

I tried the Last Kingdom. But it looked boring right from the start.

 

Just hang through the first few episodes.  It gets better. 

Posted
2 hours ago, New guy said:

Surely the third one was the best, everything happens in the third one after set up of first two, the red wedding, the purple wedding, tyrions trial and escape, entire oberyn story, tywins death, jon snow becoming commander, jamies redemption arc, lady stone heart and so much more 

 

Too many characters to keep track of in the books. A lot of them appear important but then just fade away. Also the names are pretty hard to remember as well. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Vicks57 said:

 

No, Sati is different from "Jauhar".

 

"Jauhar" is because of Islamic invasions.

 

Sati was just another form of Jauhar.

Instead of a group, its for one individual.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, singhvivek141 said:

Sati was just another form of Jauhar.

Instead of a group, its for one individual.

 

 

Different causes.

 

Jauhar was to save their dignity and avoid being raped by invaders.

 

Sati was forced  practice of burning the wife after husband died, as it was viewed she was the cause of his death or had no purpose to live anymore. It is way older and named after Sati goddess.

Posted
50 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Different causes.

 

Jauhar was to save their dignity and avoid being raped by invaders.

 

Sati was forced  practice of burning the wife after husband died, as it was viewed she was the cause of his death or had no purpose to live anymore. It is way older and named after Sati goddess.

Sati was practiced in miniscule numbers in Rajasthan, found a couple of instances in Bengal. EIC wanted to get British army into India and wanted to showcause how primitive India was , used this practice and set a narrative of being widespread in use. They got Raja Ram Mohan Roy to do their bidding, got this abolished and got their additional troops to India to spread their kingdom. Just a few 100 yeats before this they were burning women and girls thinking they were witches.  There are so many versions of what Sati means, one community thought it was to burn. 

 

Yes, Sati in whatever version is not Jauhar. 

Posted
On 2/4/2025 at 12:17 PM, kepler37b said:

best Indian movie of 2024 for me. Hands down.

 

On 2/7/2025 at 12:56 AM, Gollum said:

Meiyazhagan is class, one of the most beautiful films I have watched in recent years. From the maker of 96 (Prem Kumar), but this movie is much better IMO.

 

2024 was a great year for Tamil cinema. Maharaja, Meiyazhagan, Amaran, Lubber Pandhu, Vaazhai. Vettaiyan was good compared to Rajini's recent filmography, you can even watch Thangalaan for the acting.

Agree, Meiyazhagan is pretty good, inspiring movie to figure what to live for, in life. Enjoyed watching a good movie after a long time. Kamalhassan singing couple songs was awesome :congrats:

Posted (edited)
On 2/13/2025 at 10:53 PM, Gollum said:

Headache inducing crap fest. I actually liked Kalki, especially its world building. But most people **** on that movie and love Pushpa 2. 

Looking at the poster, I was :confused: why the movie has Mahatma Gandhi from his Champaran stir days.

 

image.png

 

The bald character in the middle?

 

help @maniac @kepler37b

Edited by Mariyam
Posted
15 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

Sati was just another form of Jauhar.

Instead of a group, its for one individual.

 

Nope Jauhar is practiced during Wartimes.

Muslim Hindu Sikh women did mass suicides during partition.

 

During Invasion of Mirpur by Tribals and Pak army same thing was done by Hindu/Sikh Women when thousands commited mass suicides.

Posted
53 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

Looking at the poster, I was :confused: why the movie has Mahatma Gandhi from his Champaran stir days.

 

image.png

 

The bald character in the middle?

 

help @maniac @kepler37b

That is lover boy SRK, who did a Dunki to telugu film industry, unable to bear the cost of living in mumbai.

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

 

Agree, Meiyazhagan is pretty good, inspiring movie to figure what to live for, in life. Enjoyed watching a good movie after a long time. Kamalhassan singing couple songs was awesome :congrats:

I told ya it is a good film. 

 

I never go wrong. 

 

brahmi-venky.gif

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...