Jump to content

Would you like to see Ishan Kishan given a shot at No. 6 in LOIs for India?


TNAmarkFromIndia

Would you like to see Ishan Kishan given a shot at No. 6 in LOIs for India?  

15 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you like to see Ishan Kishan given a shot at No. 6 in LOIs for India?

    • Yes
      13
    • No
      2


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

 

I am surprised too.

 

Tewatia looks almost ready for T20s atleast.

I would like selectors to groom Abhishek Sharma as a batsman who bowls spin. He will do good as 5th-6th bowling option. You need to identify some players for such roles and talk to them, make them understand what you are expecting from them and what needs to be done. This old selection method isn't going to work anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

I would like selectors to groom Abhishek Sharma as a batsman who bowls spin. He will do good as 5th-6th bowling option. You need to identify some players for such roles and talk to them, make them understand what you are expecting from them and what needs to be done. This old selection method isn't going to work anymore.

Abdul samad is the guy specially when we are looking at 6th n 7th batting position , Abhishek looks more of a batsman who loves to time the ball whereas samad use brute strength. Abhishek will enjoy batting up the order like he does for Punjab . 

Abdul shud be taken in A team straight away even though he hasnt done much in domestic but he looks like a game changer and he needs to be developed at higher level. Also his state side needs to be told to make him bowl around 10 overs every game so his bowling grows or else it will be a slow growth specially in J&K ranji side. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/6/2020 at 7:17 PM, TNAmarkFromIndia said:

You want to pack our team with all-rounders but that would backfire more often than not. Pandya and Jadeja come off once in 15-20 games. Then when our team gets bundled out, you'll curse the weak batting line-up.

 

Pandya and Jadeja are both No. 7s at best. You can't play them both, and if you do, you'll have to drop one bowler.

Right now, Pandya is not even bowling. You really think he will bowl 10 overs all of a sudden? And anyways he was never even a good bowler to bowl 10 overs. I think if Pandya focusses on his batting more, he can be a 35 averaging 120 S/R type batsmen and could be used as sixth bowling options.

 

It is a risk and right now with him not bowling, it only makes sense for him to become a more consistent batsmen because with bowl, he will anyways be trundling at 120 kph once he starts bowling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/7/2020 at 1:47 AM, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Abdul samad is the guy specially when we are looking at 6th n 7th batting position , Abhishek looks more of a batsman who loves to time the ball whereas samad use brute strength. Abhishek will enjoy batting up the order like he does for Punjab . 

Abdul shud be taken in A team straight away even though he hasnt done much in domestic but he looks like a game changer and he needs to be developed at higher level. Also his state side needs to be told to make him bowl around 10 overs every game so his bowling grows or else it will be a slow growth specially in J&K ranji side. 

Samad's bowling is strictly part time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Majestic said:

I think if Pandya focusses on his batting more, he can be a 35 averaging 120 S/R type batsmen and could be used as sixth bowling options.

Pandya is not a No. 6. You need a proper bat at that position. Pandya is good for cameos, but he comes off once in 15-20 matches. He's more like a Yusuf Pathan, and even Yusuf wasn't a No. 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TNAmarkFromIndia said:

Pandya is not a No. 6. You need a proper bat at that position. Pandya is good for cameos, but he comes off once in 15-20 matches. He's more like a Yusuf Pathan, and even Yusuf wasn't a No. 6.

Absolutely guy is a strict no 7 & that should be his role too.  Last 5-6 overs is the time when we need him.  Jadeja can work at no 6 in ODI as he takes time & is better bat than Jadhav.  SKY is also other option don't know about his chucking problem.  Then the next in line is Nitish Rana. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rkt.india said:

Samad's bowling is strictly part time.

 

6th bowler has to be just part timer only, he has got control and bowls a googly as well just need more bowling thats it . 

We are looking at a power hitter not better bowler if that was the case Axar, jadeja was not even a problem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

6th bowler has to be just part timer only, he has got control and bowls a googly as well just need more bowling thats it . 

We are looking at a power hitter not better bowler if that was the case Axar, jadeja was not even a problem

If it was a part-timer we wanted, we already have Rohit Sharma. Sure he hasn't bowled in a long time, but a part-timer wouldn't get to bowl much either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TNAmarkFromIndia said:

If it was a part-timer we wanted, we already have Rohit Sharma. Sure he hasn't bowled in a long time, but a part-timer wouldn't get to bowl much either.

 

when he doesnt bowl due to his shoulder issue then how is he even a part timer, when u dnt bowl u dnt bowl. 

Samad is a bit more then a part timer just needs to start bowling a lil more 

 

6th bowler is just a cushion of 5 overs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TNAmarkFromIndia said:

Pandya is not a No. 6. You need a proper bat at that position. Pandya is good for cameos, but he comes off once in 15-20 matches. He's more like a Yusuf Pathan, and even Yusuf wasn't a No. 6.

pandya won MOS against Aus batting at 4 playing all matured knocks , he is good enough to go at 5 now just that team dont have anyone to do what he does at 7 

And that certain yusuf pathan did better in Sa then many and he wasnt as good a player of fast bowling as hardik is 

 

If u bat at 7 most life ur career will have cameos only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/6/2020 at 7:17 PM, TNAmarkFromIndia said:

You want to pack our team with all-rounders but that would backfire more often than not. Pandya and Jadeja come off once in 15-20 games. Then when our team gets bundled out, you'll curse the weak batting line-up.

 

Pandya and Jadeja are both No. 7s at best. You can't play them both, and if you do, you'll have to drop one bowler.

 

every team is packed with all rounders - look at NZ- CDGH, Neesham, Santner

pandya n jadeja bat at such position that they get rare chances and when they do they have to hit only, neways jadeja never was  no.7 product he is better batting above

 

When ur team bundled last in Semi it was hardik n pant who 1st had a partnership and then jadeja and before that in 2017 Ct it was pandya 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/6/2020 at 2:58 PM, TNAmarkFromIndia said:

Since our 4 and 5 seems to be set (for now) with Iyer and Rahul, would you like to see Kishan given a shot at No. 6? Samson is inconsistent and Pant seems to have lost his form.

and what go with just 5 bowlers, team around the wold have 6-7 bowling options now and we are going with 5. What if someone has a bad day or gets injured

 

Remeber Wc

  • when bhuvi pulled out in pakistan game
  • hardik got injured in NZ game and somehow trundled and finished his overs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/6/2020 at 2:58 PM, TNAmarkFromIndia said:

Since our 4 and 5 seems to be set (for now) with Iyer and Rahul, would you like to see Kishan given a shot at No. 6? Samson is inconsistent and Pant seems to have lost his form.

 

also in t20 realyy ? how much batting do u need in a 20 over game 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

when he doesnt bowl due to his shoulder issue then how is he even a part timer, when u dnt bowl u dnt bowl. 

His shoulder issues have nothing to do with not bowling. Virat Kohli just doesn't prefer to bowl from part-timers. He did from Jadhav because he proved to be a golden arm.

 

Rohit said in an interview this May that he is prepared to bowl 10 overs in Test matches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In ODI cricket batting unit is settled.  We just need some urgency in Powerplay.  Our last ODI series loss was in NZ clean sweep actually.  Pacers were thrashed & Spinners both Chahal & Kuldeep were mauled.  Bowling is a issue in ODI for us.  Before that WI also chased 320+ vs us. 

 

Kishan can work in T20I as Pant is not playing.  Drop Iyer or Pandey & bring him in.  A left hander in middle order is what we are lacking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

pandya won MOS against Aus batting at 4 playing all matured knocks

He played only one match at No. 4 in that series. And if you want to go that far back, you could still make a case for Kedar Jadhav who was Man Of The Series against England that same year. He solves your part-timer problem too. Do you want Kedar Jadhav?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...