Who is more charitable ??? Lord karnan or Smiling assasin Chahal ???

[Vk1]

14 hours ago, OpeningBatsman said:

I live in Mumbaii (born m brt up), but I'm originally from Kerala. It's same in my language too. 

I know how to differentiate between a state and a region lol 

 

hahah out of 5 southern states, may be used only in two then.. 

[dilliboy]

10 hours ago, Clarke said:

 

WTF, where did that come from 

Our picture of Mahabharat has been coloured through the ages to see Pandavas as the epitome of good and Duryodhan as the epitome of evil. In theory, both sides had grey characters and you can't pinpoint really anyone who was truly at fault. Duryodhana was said to be a great ruler in many respects and one of the most fearsome warriors. In fact, Kauravas actually were the ones who went to heaven after Kurukshetra 

[dilliboy]

10 hours ago, Clarke said:

 

WTF, where did that come from 

Our picture of Mahabharat has been coloured through the ages to see Pandavas as the epitome of good and Duryodhan as the epitome of evil. In theory, both sides had grey characters and you can't pinpoint really anyone who was truly at fault. Duryodhana was said to be a great ruler in many respects and one of the most fearsome warriors. In fact, Kauravas actually were the ones who went to heaven after Kurukshetra 

[dilliboy]

10 hours ago, Clarke said:

 

WTF, where did that come from 

Our picture of Mahabharat has been coloured through the ages to see Pandavas as the epitome of good and Duryodhan as the epitome of evil. In theory, both sides had grey characters and you can't pinpoint really anyone who was truly at fault. Duryodhana was said to be a great ruler in many respects and one of the most fearsome warriors. In fact, Kauravas actually were the ones who went to heaven after Kurukshetra 

[Clarke]

48 minutes ago, dilliboy said:

Our picture of Mahabharat has been coloured through the ages to see Pandavas as the epitome of good and Duryodhan as the epitome of evil. In theory, both sides had grey characters and you can't pinpoint really anyone who was truly at fault. Duryodhana was said to be a great ruler in many respects and one of the most fearsome warriors. In fact, Kauravas actually were the ones who went to heaven after Kurukshetra 

I understand that Duryodhan would have some admirable qualities, it's the modern day political categorisation that cracked me up. I'd find it funny if they label someone as first conservative or first lgbtqrstghfd activist.

[Clarke]

Eng must be missing Arnold Chahal

[vvvslaxman]

India just has to change one letter :) Chahal -> Chahar