India ODI Squad Anounced

[Ankit_sharma03]

3 hours ago, Bigg Brother said:

Shaw should have been selected instead of Krunal. Really cant find any reason behind selecting Krunal Pandya.

shaw shud have been selected but in place of an opener

How can u select him in place of Krunal??? Axar shud have been selected in place of Krunal 

[Lone Wolf]

28 minutes ago, Clarke said:

Bowling looks avg or below. Who's the most reliable bowler in the squad, Natarajan ? Bumrah & Shami are hard to replace in ODIs.

Shami got clobbered in Australia..  I think Siraj can be superior option as our bowlers suck at Powerplays so he can maybe pick early wickets. 

[Adamant]

4 hours ago, ShoonyaSifar said:

SKY and Prasidh are very good picks. Will keep asking this question though, what do we gain by playing/picking all the three seniors together?

 

Is King Clown totally blind to the fact that we have lost ODI series in Aus and NZ?

We played our B  side against newzealand, even in Aus Rohit wasn't there. 

[raki05]

43 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

wrong selections

 

Siraj- wrong format

Krunal- wrong format 

SKY- wrong format

I think sky selection is not wrong... agree with krunal and siraj.

[Adamant]

11 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

shaw shud have been selected but in place of an opener

How can u select him in place of Krunal??? Axar shud have been selected in place of Krunal 

Do you think Axar has the batting skills which we need down the order. 

Krunal is definitely a better batsman than him and an ok choice for sixth bowler 

[Lone Wolf]

Best bowling line up for 1st Odi

Siraj (new ball specialist) 

Shardul/Prasidh 

Natarajan (at death & middle overs) 

 

Spinners : Kuldeep + Sundar

Pandya 6th bowling option

 

No Bhuvi ffs he never never picks wickets..  Wastes new ball & has been terrible in ODIs in last couple of years whenever he played. 

 

[Adamant]

38 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Also why is Saini dropped ?

SprayGun. 

[Ankit_sharma03]

1 minute ago, Adamant said:

Do you think Axar has the batting skills which we need down the order. 

Krunal is definitely a better batsman than him and an ok choice for sixth bowler 

Krunal is not a better batsman, In India he is the worst player of short ball ...the worst. He hits spin well but thats about 

Axar is better batsman for longer format 

Also Krunal bowling is bets suited for t20. In t20 ill take krunal even over jadeja but in bigger format krunal falls behind those 2 

[Adamant]

Apart from Bumrah and Shami we don't have any other good bowler in ODI's. 

And this is not just limited to this squad, i don't see any good ODI fast bowler in India apart from the two mentioned. 

 

[Ankit_sharma03]

1 minute ago, Adamant said:

SprayGun. 

 

and siraj isnt in LOI . 

Its just a short career to pass of a judgement. If spraygun is the issue ppl shud look at thakur eco in ODI 

[sandsaims]

4 hours ago, Gollum said:

Chahal in Aus ODIs:

 

1st ODI: 1/89 in 10 overs...worst spinner from both sides

 

2nd ODI: 0/71 in 9 overs....worst spinner from both sides

 

Thankfully dropped in 3rd ODI and we avoided whitewash.

 

Since beginning of 2019 has done nothing of note in ODIs, lost us a home series against Aus, got hammered in the WC, dreadful in WC SF, worst spinner on display in every series for the last 2 years. Can't hold a bat, can't catch, can't field. How is he never dropped?

Kaptaan's buddy like Dhawan.

[Ankit_sharma03]

8 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Shami got clobbered in Australia..  I think Siraj can be superior option as our bowlers suck at Powerplays so he can maybe pick early wickets. 

 

everyone gets clobbered some time or other . No siraj isnt a good white ball bowler as of now 

[Lone Wolf]

18 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

gill is a backup opener

That's why he ain't getting a game.. Unless India wins two Odi b2b against a strong English side.  Middle order may see a bit of shuffle.  Openers ain't going anywhere barring injury. 

[Adamant]

1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Krunal is not a better batsman, In India he is the worst player of short ball ...the worst. He hits spin well but thats about 

Axar is better batsman for longer format 

Also Krunal bowling is bets suited for t20. In t20 ill take krunal even over jadeja but in bigger format krunal falls behind those 2 

I haven't seen them much apart from ipl, Krunal is definitely better there, but even his list a and first class batting stats are better.? Axar might have improved recently but he averages 12 in 38 odis with the bat. 

I think you are making a wrong judgement here. 

[Ankit_sharma03]

7 minutes ago, raki05 said:

I think sky selection is not wrong... agree with krunal and siraj.

 

I hve never been convinced by him as a longer format batsman. 

[Adamant]

2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

and siraj isnt in LOI . 

Its just a short career to pass of a judgement. If spraygun is the issue ppl shud look at thakur eco in ODI 

Yeah Same goes for Siraj, he shouldn't have been selected. 

Thakur has the ability to become an allrounder, i will keep him in the team for now. 

[Ankit_sharma03]

Just now, Adamant said:

I haven't seen them much apart from ipl, Krunal is definitely better there, but even his list a and first class batting stats are better.? Axar might have improved recently but he averages 12 in 38 odis with the bat. 

I think you are making a wrong judgement here. 

in short career number shudnt be looked to srsly . 

Krunal issue is known to everyone 

 

vague judgement on krunal short ball problem ??? 

[Ankit_sharma03]

Just now, Adamant said:

Yeah Same goes for Siraj, he shouldn't have been selected. 

Thakur has the ability to become an allrounder, i will keep him in the team for now. 

 

all rounder is a big term . Thakur will max be a bowler who cud bat like cummins

[Lone Wolf]

1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

everyone gets clobbered some time or other . No siraj isnt a good white ball bowler as of now 

I don't  get it if you have capability to pick up early wickets or move the ball at decent pace then you are good enough ODI bowler..  Not T20 though.  Odi is slightly different & that's why Hazelwood Boult etc have best stats in Odis off late as they pick Powerplay wickets..  Which has been our weak link in last 2 years.  Siraj gets good movement with new ball at good pace which will help us in the area.  ODI & T20 bowling has big difference imo.  Someone like Prasidh may not be a good T20 bowler but he can be a gun ODI bowler like Hazelwood. 

[Adamant]

1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

all rounder is a big term . Thakur will max be a bowler who cud bat like cummins

Nah man.... He can play well against pace and also has good hitting ability. 

I think if he works on his batting he can be an allrounder, his 60 odd at gabba consisted of classic shots and not just blind slogs.