Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Ye kab hua yaar...  Hopefully nothing serious 

 

KKR have Avinash Manhas as a net bowler who get in if Harshit has a serious injury.

Posted
On 4/2/2024 at 10:04 PM, rkt.india said:

Mayank is a true express pacer. He clocks 155 on demand.

i agree ..he is too good but i just saw his domestic matches , he has played 17 first class matches and got 34 wickets ..probably he was getting ready and now he is ready to rock. i think Morne morkel is training him well and hope he is picked to help indian pacers.

 

i trust BOOM, Siraj , Mayank ,Hardik Pandya and Khaleel yadav could be our Pacer attack. Shammi may not be fit for t20 world cup.

Outside chance of Harshit rana , Shardul, and Akashdeep also. Selectors support Mukesh and avesh khan too- i dont think they will be selected.

Mohsin is not at his best, vyasak also has some chance.

Posted
Just now, express bowling said:

 

They should go for Himanshu Chauhan.

 

In all probability Manhas is not a proper bowler yet.. Just hurls the ball quickly. Plus he is too short. 

Himanshu is with KKR? or are you saying they should buy him now?

Posted
5 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Himanshu is not with anyone AFAIK 

 

Incase Harshit is not available they will get to pick a new player, isn't it.

Mavi is out of ipl

Posted
6 hours ago, express bowling said:

Arora is interesting.

 

Big swing.

 

Tall and has a good bouncer.

 

Medium pace but can push in a few quicker ones 

 

 

he should be considered specifically for greentops with swing

Posted
5 hours ago, Vijy said:

he should be considered specifically for greentops with swing

 

Arora is a much better medium pacer than Mukesh and Unadkat.

 

Because he gets more swing, big swing and has a vicious bouncer. 

 

And his fuller balls are less floaty than Arshdeep.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Vijy said:

he should be considered specifically for greentops with swing

 

Arora averages 22 in FC after 24 matches.  

 

I often wonder whether selectors and TMs look at attributes of pacers before choosing them. 

 

If a medium pacer has to be picked then pick one who gets big swing and has height and bounce.  

 

I always felt that Ishwar Pandey was a more versatile swing bowler than Bhuvi. Similar swing and pace but more height and bounce. But he was,never picked.

 

I know Arora swings the ball in most of the times and does not have a significant outswinger, and this will go against him. But when the inswing is so big then even the straighter ball has similar effects as an away going delivery. This was the case with old Ishant. 

 

He can be used in some tests in England and NZ, but nowhere else.

Posted
5 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

Arora is a much better medium pacer than Mukesh and Unadkat.

 

Because he gets more swing, big swing and has a vicious bouncer. 

 

And his fuller balls are less floaty than Arshdeep.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Like the sound software vicious bouncer. If you get get the wicket, then kill the batsman. That was the motto of west indies quartet

 

Posted
7 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

Arora is a much better medium pacer than Mukesh and Unadkat.

 

Because he gets more swing, big swing and has a vicious bouncer. 

 

And his fuller balls are less floaty than Arshdeep.

 

 

 

 

 

 

yeah, I agree. he is indeed much better. likewise, madhwal among trundlers is better for T20s than undercutter, mukesh, harshal, etc

×
×
  • Create New...