Austin 3:!6 Posted October 25, 2021 Author Share Posted October 25, 2021 Rizwan's running between the wicket is just awesome...too strong in legs. Pant probably never ran so much in his entire life what Rizzu did yesterday alone Also, Rizwan is a smart player....Pant is dumb fellow. Dont know which shot to play in what situation. Semi Final 2019, WTC finals, yesterday's game - same story everytime. Throw his wicket away with stupid shots in crucial time. Indwin and nitinbwj 1 1 Link to comment
putrevus Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 Pant does not belong in middle order in shorter formats. He needs to open and given license to go after bowling from ball one.You will see different Pant. I don't think team is giving him a chance to succeed completely.Pant also has to evolve and look for more strokes to turn the strike over.. nitinbwj 1 Link to comment
ShoonyaSifar Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 1 hour ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Rizwan's running between the wicket is just awesome...too strong in legs. Pant probably never ran so much in his entire life what Rizzu did yesterday alone Also, Rizwan is a smart player....Pant is dumb fellow. Dont know which shot to play in what situation. Semi Final 2019, WTC finals, yesterday's game - same story everytime. Throw his wicket away with stupid shots in crucial time. The guy has played 3 legendary innings in last 12 months alone. Sure, he is dumb. He will end up with a far superior record than Rizwan or any other current keeper. Sgattick10 and Mosher 2 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 1 hour ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Also, Rizwan is a smart player....Pant is dumb fellow. Dont know which shot to play in what situation. thats the diff ppl dnt get with aggressive player, if u want aggresive players u need understand one thing - Its high risk Rizwan doesnt play high risk hence he isnt also a high impact player Pant plays high risk game which is why he pulled of Gabba , such players are the one who can win u from nowhere but its a high risk game so it wont come off most days. Consistency and high risk cant and never will go hand in hand If ppl want rizwan kind then why have problem with rohit kohli whose s/r is almost 10 better then rizwan Suhaan, Mosher and Sgattick10 1 2 Link to comment
Suhaan Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 1 hour ago, Austin 3:!6 said: Rizwan's running between the wicket is just awesome...too strong in legs. Pant probably never ran so much in his entire life what Rizzu did yesterday alone Also, Rizwan is a smart player....Pant is dumb fellow. Dont know which shot to play in what situation. Semi Final 2019, WTC finals, yesterday's game - same story everytime. Throw his wicket away with stupid shots in crucial time. I saw you saying no problem with Kohli,if not for him we wouldn't have posted 150+ Let me tell you if not for Pant's innings yesterday Kohli/no Kohli India would have struggled to post even 120 Kohli was crawling like snail and creating pressure on non striker as it always happens with consolidators they forget the fine line between anchoring and consolidating Anchoring doesn't mean getting choked while batting Mosher and Sgattick10 2 Link to comment
Suhaan Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 7 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: thats the diff ppl dnt get with aggressive player, if u want aggresive players u need understand one thing - Its high risk Rizwan doesnt play high risk hence he isnt also a high impact player Pant plays high risk game which is why he pulled of Gabba , such players are the one who can win u from nowhere but its a high risk game so it wont come off most days. Consistency and high risk cant and never will go hand in hand If ppl want rizwan kind then why have problem with rohit kohli whose s/r is almost 10 better then rizwan They want everything ,yes and no together Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 Gaadi tez bhi chalani lekin accident na hone ki guarantee bhi chahiye.......................ye nhin ho sakta Link to comment
Austin 3:!6 Posted October 25, 2021 Author Share Posted October 25, 2021 8 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: thats the diff ppl dnt get with aggressive player, if u want aggresive players u need understand one thing - Its high risk Rizwan doesnt play high risk hence he isnt also a high impact player Pant plays high risk game which is why he pulled of Gabba , such players are the one who can win u from nowhere but its a high risk game so it wont come off most days. Consistency and high risk cant and never will go hand in hand If ppl want rizwan kind then why have problem with rohit kohli whose s/r is almost 10 better then rizwan But aggression is different from being reckless. Its the same thing Afridi used to do blindly slog irrespective of game situation. Pant is a great talent indeed but can improve with the judgement of a game. Link to comment
Suhaan Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 3 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: But aggression is different from being reckless. Its the same thing Afridi used to do blindly slog irrespective of game situation. Pant is a great talent indeed but can improve with the judgement of a game. Pant wasn't blindly slogging yesterday,it was a very calculated innings, His dismissal was a combination of batting partner pressure + slow sticky surface He did bring back the momentum by derailing Hasan Ali,but it in return got derailed by his own partner Mosher 1 Link to comment
vayuu1 Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 rizwan opens and pant play at no 5 or 6,so two different roles Ankit_sharma03 and Mosher 2 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 3 minutes ago, Austin 3:!6 said: But aggression is different from being reckless. Its the same thing Afridi used to do blindly slog irrespective of game situation. Pant is a great talent indeed but can improve with the judgement of a game. Let me bust afridi concept....... afridi played some senstaional knocks His downfall came coz he didnt work hard on his batting But ppl forget even if he had 20 ducks na , opposition still feared him So to become like afridi u need to stop working hard on ur batting as well. When ever high risk game comes off its aggression and whenever it doesnt its reckless (its been same for jayasuria to sehwag to gilly to now pant and pandya) Blind slogging is what a tail does............pant kind of player play high risk - ab yaar samne bowler bhi to khelne aaya hai na, he ll do everything to deceive it and when batsman gets deceived he looks foolish Link to comment
Hell Raiser Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 Rizwan has the advantage of opening the innings. Pant if given proper opportunity to open in white ball format can be absolutely lethal and take the game away from the opposition. To a lesser extent he can do the same in the middle overs. Can't say the sams about Rizwan. That guy can only open and still won't win many matches on his own like Pant. Rizwan is brilliant in tests though. Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 3 minutes ago, vayuu1 said: rizwan opens and pant play at no 5 or 6,so two different roles and when u bat low u need to use power more which a lot of times make u loose ur shape , at top u can do with timing or clearing circle Hitting against a older n softer ball is more harder with no time to get ur eye in, not everyone is ABDV or maxi (who also btw has been massively inconsistent) who are blessed with power and range Link to comment
Majestic Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 2 hours ago, ShoonyaSifar said: Rizwan opens and has a career SR of 130 (boosted by playing Zimbabwe and SA B teams). He was absolutely brilliant yesterday but is never going to be a 135-140 SR batsman Openers S/R are supposed to be lesser than lower middle order. Isn't it? Openers averages and runs tally should be higher than lower middle order. Ofcourse, there are few cases like Gilchrist, Sehwag, Roy which is different. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now