Jump to content

Mayank Agarwal ruled out of 1st test , was hit on the head off a Siraj bouncer in nets.


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sandeep99 said:

If clown has learnt even an ounce from his last 3 tours to England, he would realize that lower order runs are the KEY in England. It would be just plain stupidity to include 3 no.11s who contribute effectively 0 runs. This itself should just rule out 2 of Bumrah - Shami - 100 test gadha.

Bhai bowling kaun Karega fir?

So only one of Bumrah, Shami Or Iahant that means lets say we take Shami. 

So Shami, Shardul and Siraj and two spinners, this is your bowling lineup? 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, CodeOfWisden said:

Bhai bowling kaun Karega fir?

So only one of Bumrah, Shami Or Iahant that means lets say we take Shami. 

So Shami, Shardul and Siraj and two spinners, this is your bowling lineup? 

Bhai.. Shardul and Siraj are better proponents of swing bowling than Bumrah. Anyone is better than Ishant who is a certified failure in his last 3 tours to England. 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Sandeep99 said:

Bhai.. Shardul and Siraj are better proponents of swing bowling than Bumrah. Anyone is better than Ishant who is a certified failure in his last 3 tours to England. 

He failed on the last tour? Really? Please check his stats. 

Shardul isn't a better bowler than Bumrah and Shami in any conditions. 

Link to comment
4 hours ago, CodeOfWisden said:

Bhai bowling kaun Karega fir?

So only one of Bumrah, Shami Or Iahant that means lets say we take Shami. 

So Shami, Shardul and Siraj and two spinners, this is your bowling lineup? 

Why not? Siraj and Shardul will not bowl worse than how Bumrah and Ishant bowled in WTC finals  

Link to comment
1 minute ago, ShoonyaSifar said:

Why not? Siraj and Shardul will not bowl worse than how Bumrah and Ishant bowled in WTC finals  

So one match is your sample size? 

What about the last time when they toured England or Sa or Aus?

In 2018 they broke West Indies quartet's record for wickets in a year and you think Shardul is as good as Bumrah.

I agree with Siraj being top notch but Shardul is not in the same class as Bumrah and Shami and should be used as 4th pacer. He can't replace either of them, we both are disappointed by the results of WTC doesn't mean that we replace our only bowler who has a legit shot at ATG status. Stuff happens. 

Link to comment
51 minutes ago, CodeOfWisden said:

He failed on the last tour? Really? Please check his stats. 

Shardul isn't a better bowler than Bumrah and Shami in any conditions. 

Ishant bowls an occasional spell here and there but he's bang mediocre. Time for him to retire now that he proved mediocrity can also achieve 100 test matches.

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, CodeOfWisden said:

So one match is your sample size? 

What about the last time when they toured England or Sa or Aus?

In 2018 they broke West Indies quartet's record for wickets in a year and you think Shardul is as good as Bumrah.

I agree with Siraj being top notch but Shardul is not in the same class as Bumrah and Shami and should be used as 4th pacer. He can't replace either of them, we both are disappointed by the results of WTC doesn't mean that we replace our only bowler who has a legit shot at ATG status. Stuff happens. 

We've seen enough of Bombayrah to conclude that Siraj is a better test bowler than him. Ishant 100 test gadha sharma has already achieved his lifelong dream of 100 tests and time to retire. Thakur is a much better swing bowler and importantly a wicket taker. Also contributes with the bat.

Link to comment
16 minutes ago, Sandeep99 said:

We've seen enough of Bombayrah to conclude that Siraj is a better test bowler than him. Ishant 100 test gadha sharma has already achieved his lifelong dream of 100 tests and time to retire. Thakur is a much better swing bowler and importantly a wicket taker. Also contributes with the bat.

After 10 tests you are gonna say the same about Siraj. Lol

And who are you abusing? They are not here to hear your kind words. 

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, CodeOfWisden said:

So one match is your sample size? 

What about the last time when they toured England or Sa or Aus?

In 2018 they broke West Indies quartet's record for wickets in a year and you think Shardul is as good as Bumrah.

I agree with Siraj being top notch but Shardul is not in the same class as Bumrah and Shami and should be used as 4th pacer. He can't replace either of them, we both are disappointed by the results of WTC doesn't mean that we replace our only bowler who has a legit shot at ATG status. Stuff happens. 

2018 was 3 years ago. Since then count the number of injuries they have had.

 

No disrespect to Bumrah but he hasn't look like taking wickets in all recent matches across formats and is out of rhythm. Shardul  OTOH took 7 wickets in his last test and scored crucial match winning runs. Good enough to be the 3rd seamer behind Siraj and Shami. Plus gives the team the option of playing a swing bowler who can bowl 135+

 

Bumrah can always back later in the series. Some the strategic rest can do wonders to a player's confidence

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, CodeOfWisden said:

After 10 tests you are gonna say the same about Siraj. Lol

And who are you abusing? They are not here to hear your kind words. 

Maybe yes. We need to play guys who are in good form. That is the advantage of creating a big pool of players. Siraj is in red hot form at the moment and will definitely add zip to the attack. Bumrah looks out of form and needs to be benched for the time being in tests.

 

I have not abused anyone. Not sure why you're getting offended.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...