Jump to content

IPL teams are likely to be allowed to retain 4 players - 3 Indians and 1 overseas or a maximum of 3 Indians and maximum of 2 overseas, BCCI contemplates 'special picks' for two new IPL franchises


Ankit_sharma03

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

The one they are losing are not of top quality. more like tier 2

hows is SKY, kishen, iyer not top quality ...they are current indian players

that much these franchises deserve to build teams for years, they have also invested in them. That anyways u can loose in auction

Thats why im in favour of 5 overseas now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Retaining 3 is perfect. 4 is borderline ok, but surely not more

 

4 per team means top 32 players become unavailable for the new franchises.  Will still be okay as long as they get first dibs on the released players.

 

5 overseas players is a no brainer. It leaves 6 Indian players times 10 teams = 60 Indian players.. plus let's say 3-4 backups per team.. that makes it 100 Indian players.. that's quite a large pool.. One surely needs to be among the top 100 players in the country to be part of a tournament as competitve as the IPL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2021 at 8:57 PM, Ankit_sharma03 said:

hows is SKY, kishen, iyer not top quality ...they are current indian players

that much these franchises deserve to build teams for years, they have also invested in them. That anyways u can loose in auction

Thats why im in favour of 5 overseas now 

Teams are struggling to find even 4 good overseas and Playing likes of Christian, Tom Curran, etc and you are talking about 5 overseas. Don't need more overseas mediocrity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Teams are struggling to find even 4 good overseas and Playing likes of Christian, Tom Curran, etc and you are talking about 5 overseas. Don't need more overseas mediocrity.

Yeah where are these great overseas players???Ellis? Allen? Phillipe? Malan? IPL is too competitive for even these guys, whats wrong with the local players grabbing these places? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rkt.india said:

Teams are struggling to find even 4 good overseas and Playing likes of Christian, Tom Curran, etc and you are talking about 5 overseas. Don't need more overseas mediocrity.

team are even struggling to find good Indian core beyond a point, their cant be enough high quality cricketers  any country to keep 10 teams at high quality. Guys like mandeep singh, jadhav , saurabh tiwary are still playing. 10 teams means around 150 Indian cricketers, ho hi nhin sakte itne high quality cricketers . The competition will start to dip and so many top indian players who have been playing from season 1-2 will retire in next 2 yrs. 

 

This Dan Christian , tom Curran logic is so idiotic na.....think why they get selected. They get selected as all rounders and their aren't enough quality all rounders in world. Also how many seam bowling are their in our country ?? ye complain tab karo jab humare pass bhar bhar ke stock ho. Every team need seam bowling all rounder- Demand hai to supply hogi (quality jaisi bhi ho)


Upar se unke coach captain Gadhe hai ki Hasaranga aur chameera hone baad dan ko khila rhe hai. Even in this IPL quality of international players was good considering so many from Aus n Eng choose to rest.Teams have started looking at leagues and their are enough cricketers overseas and if team feels they have better Indian players so drop overseas players in XI - CSK, MI, RCB have done it in recent yrs.  

 

Teams like DC, CSK, MI dnt need so many overseas but other teams do. Other team suffer from structure issues due to the leftover talent thats why they needs more overseas players.  RR, SRH, KXIP will become much better sides with 1 more overseas player and it ll be make league more competitive . Next 2 sides will suffer from structure issue even more as Top Indian talent wud be retained . U cnt structure 10 good sides based on 7 local talents which is in past few yrs IPL has been dominated by few sides. 

 

Currently if an IPL XI has 7 indian players  means 7 x 8 =56 indian players in XI

Now that we are adding 2 new sides assume we play just 6 indian players - 6x10 is 60 indian players ...so indian players are still increasing

 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/15/2021 at 4:08 AM, bowl_out said:

5 overseas players is a no brainer. It leaves 6 Indian players times 10 teams = 60 Indian players.. plus let's say 3-4 backups per team.. that makes it 100 Indian players.. that's quite a large pool.. One surely needs to be among the top 100 players in the country to be part of a tournament as competitve as the IPL 

Exactly

IPL teams squad is generally of 18-25 players with max 8 overseas limit which leaves 10-15 indian players. 10 teams means  100-150 indian players , No way their wud be so much quality and their isnt which is why beyond some sides other sides suffer due to their indian core 

Add to that these guys will retire in coming yrs - DK, Dhoni, Raina, rayudu, mishra, uthappa , bhajji now they are past their prime but they have their own value in every side. 

 

Currently if an IPL XI has 7 indian players  means 56 indian players in XI of 8 sides. 

Now that we are adding 2 new sides assume we play just 6 indian players - 6x10 is 60 indian players ...so indian players are still increasing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two new teams will dilute talent. Useless guys like gurkeerat singh, riyan parag, dube, samad etc will be automatic first choice

 

need to reduce squad sizes to 20 - 12 Indians and 8 foreign

 

further make starting Xi of 6 Indians and 5 foreign

Edited by Rantzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not just about having 60 Indians..its about balance of sides as well. Why will teams promote Indian talent in critical positions like seamer ARs or fast bowlers or lower order hitters if they can get them from overseas? There wouldnt be a Umran Malik or Iyer if teams could go into an auction planning for 5 overseas slots and just pick Indian players around them. So many blokes went unsold at auctions this year..Venky Iyer was picked up for a paltry sum of 20L after getting rejected in the first round of auctions..

 

Its still a domestic competition people are forgetting that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/14/2021 at 7:54 PM, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

4 is fine, these franchises have worked hard building core for years n years

Then whats the point in adding 2 new franchies when they cannot have top players and will be weak fron beginning? It will just drag the entire IPL down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, New guy said:

Then whats the point in adding 2 new franchies when they cannot have top players and will be weak fron beginning? It will just drag the entire IPL down

it will be unafir to someone , its unfair to those franchises as well who have put so much effort in last many yrs. They ll have to start from scratch n find talent

thats why 5 overseas 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, New guy said:

Then whats the point in adding 2 new franchies when they cannot have top players and will be weak fron beginning? It will just drag the entire IPL down

that is why they should get a first chance to pick their 4 players outside of the auction from the un-retained pool.. 

The top 32 players will still go to the existing franchises, but the next 8 players go to the new franchises before the auction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...