Bublu Bhuyan Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 (edited) 39 minutes ago, nevada said: Possible. LMAO Edited March 3 by Bublu Bhuyan Link to comment
wanted_desi Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 This man ruined his own legacy. There is no one in his life to show him mirror. I mean how there could be: He is kind of the guy who wants everyone to call him King. He will be below 45 by the time he retires. Vijy 1 Link to comment
kosingh Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 He doesn't look bad when he's batting. Just can't concentrate for more than 20-30 minutes any more. HouMac 1 Link to comment
Frustrated Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 By the time he retires, his average would hv dropped down to 40 or maybe lesser. But that won't bother him one bit. He looks physically fit. (Unlike Fatman). Therefore, ad agencies will continue to shoot with him irrespective of Team Ind' performance. His PR team on SM is one of the strongest (and equally shameless). nevada 1 Link to comment
Vijy Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 39 minutes ago, Frustrated said: By the time he retires, his average would hv dropped down to 40 or maybe lesser. But that won't bother him one bit. He looks physically fit. (Unlike Fatman). Therefore, ad agencies will continue to shoot with him irrespective of Team Ind' performance. His PR team on SM is one of the strongest (and equally shameless). these two usually go together for the king cringeohli Majestic and Frustrated 1 1 Link to comment
wanted_desi Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 Kohli Fans are just weird: There is a picture running on SM where he is talking about going back to domestic cricket and making way back to the team making it look like he is talking about currently. When it is clear that he stated that in RCB podcast talking about way back in 2012. Link to comment
nevada Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 Let him average 50 for a series first. Chakdephatte, Frustrated, Stan AF and 1 other 4 Link to comment
Vijy Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 On 3/3/2023 at 10:47 AM, nevada said: Let him average 50 for a series first. or even in 2 consecutive innings nevada and Texan 2 Link to comment
Stan AF Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 https://www.instagram.com/p/CpUtBCBIV35/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= Link to comment
Texan Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 When the broadcasters show stats when a batsman comes to the crease, they should only show stats for the last 3 years. What is the use of showing career stats and then going gaga over it! Let the commentators talk about what he has done in the last 3 years. nevada, Stan AF and Sandz 3 Link to comment
Vijy Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 7 hours ago, Texan said: When the broadcasters show stats when a batsman comes to the crease, they should only show stats for the last 3 years. What is the use of showing career stats and then going gaga over it! Let the commentators talk about what he has done in the last 3 years. they can't do that - sponsors won't allow it nevada 1 Link to comment
sage Posted March 13 Author Share Posted March 13 Test average has gone from 48.12 to 48.93 Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Sure if he plays every test at this Ahmedabad pitch Bigg Brother 1 Link to comment
putrevus Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 (edited) So if Ashwin and Jadeja have benefitted from tailor made spinning wickets then Kohli should be the king. He averages nearly 60 at home on these spinning wickets even after his three year funk. No other Indian batsmen in history is even close to him. No Sachin, no Gavaskar , no Dravd, they are not even close to this guy at home. Edited March 13 by putrevus Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, putrevus said: So if Ashwin and Jadeja have benefitted from tailor made spinning wickets then Kohli should be the king. He averages nearly 60 at home on these spinning wickets even after his three year funk. No other Indian batsmen in history is even close to him. No Sachin, no Gavaskar , no Dravd, they are not even close to this guy at home. In the last 3 years he has no partiality. Opposition, conditions. It doesn't really matter. Little stat In the last 3 year in the matches that involved Kohli.. This includes his 186. Kohli 22 tests 38 innings 1176 runs 31.78 avge 44.22 strike rate Root 9 tests 17 innings 1105 runs 73.66 avge 59.89 strike rate Just 71 shy of Kohli in 13 tests less Edited March 13 by vvvslaxman Link to comment
putrevus Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 16 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: In the last 3 years he has no partiality. Opposition, conditions. It doesn't really matter. Little stat In the last 3 year in the matches that involved Kohli.. This includes his 186. Kohli 22 tests 38 innings 1176 runs 31.78 avge 44.22 strike rate Root 9 tests 17 innings 1105 runs 73.66 avge 59.89 strike rate Just 71 shy of Kohli in 13 tests less Yes that again proves how good he has been in India on turning wickets for last decade even after 3 year slump he still has best average for batsman scoring 4000 plus runs . Link to comment
Adamant Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 21 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: In the last 3 years he has no partiality. Opposition, conditions. It doesn't really matter. Little stat In the last 3 year in the matches that involved Kohli.. This includes his 186. Kohli 22 tests 38 innings 1176 runs 31.78 avge 44.22 strike rate Root 9 tests 17 innings 1105 runs 73.66 avge 59.89 strike rate Just 71 shy of Kohli in 13 tests less Did he mention last 3 years? Bas kuch bhi likh do aa kar. Even after the failure in last 3 years he averages similar to Root, what does that tell you about his peak? Link to comment
Frustrated Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 As of now, Ghujara has got only one supporter left here on icf. It is no rocket science that coolie (little better batsman) would hv about 2 supporters here. That shows how much these 2 batsmen hv regressed over the last 3-4 years. I m glad that most ICFers understand the reality. Having said that, there are bound to be few exceptions. There is no reason for others to take their opinions and misleading stats seriously. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now