Jump to content

Baggage Bhuvaneshwar the IPL edition.


maniac

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

Taking wickets win matches ... and based on that there has never been a good Bhuvi in international cricket.

 

Wickets per match for Bhuvi on 28.2.22

 

TESTS ....  3.0

 

ODIs ....   1.17

 

T20Is .... 0.98

 

All very low.

 

There is a general perception that he is good in T20Is ... but he has taken less than 1 wicket per match in this format too.

Bhuvi had his phases across formats as a good bowler.

 

He started off with being good in ODIs (initial 2 years or so) , then had a good period in overseas Tests (2 to 3 yrs) , then became very good at T20s (primarily IPL for 3 yrs). Then came recurrent injuries and since last 2 years has been below average across formats.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

In India love of people for Boobie is still as strong as ever.  It will be miracle if he doesn't finds himself in WT20 squad. 

In India, many casual "fans" think that you cannot swing if you try to bowl fast.
They also believe that, line and length is more important than pace.

Bhuvi satisfies both the criterias on a large basis.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

In India, many casual "fans" think that you cannot swing if you try to bowl fast.
They also believe that, line and length is more important than pace.

Bhuvi satisfies both the criterias on a large basis.

 


It’s a double edged sword. Bhuvi was very effective when he was early 130k swing bowler. In fact more than LoI’s he would have been important in tests in England and Nzl or recent SA series and he was unfit for those :wall: 

 

He became a occasional 140 knuckle ball/variation/yorker death bowler and lost his primary skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

In India, many casual "fans" think that you cannot swing if you try to bowl fast.
They also believe that, line and length is more important than pace.

Bhuvi satisfies both the criterias on a large basis.

 

When u take a casual stroll in cricket twitter u will find so many people saying Umran Prasidh or guys like Kuldeep Sen will give runs.  While there's lot of respect for Boobie who has done f** all for us in LOIs & Shami is a Top bowler regardless whatever he does in ODI T20 or WC's.  No accountabilty on him. 

Harshal Deepak Chahar are treated as Marshall's & Holding. 

They are quick to criticize techniques of our batsmen but phool barsate hai Trundlers par. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

When u take a casual stroll in cricket twitter u will find so many people saying Umran Prasidh or guys like Kuldeep Sen will give runs.  While there's lot of respect for Boobie who has done f** all for us in LOIs & Shami is a Top bowler regardless whatever he does in ODI T20 or WC's.  No accountabilty on him. 

Harshal Deepak Chahar are treated as Marshall's & Holding. 

They are quick to criticize techniques of our batsmen but phool barsate hai Trundlers par. 


Guys like Sunny G Harsha etc orgasm over swing bowlers and bowlers who have “variety”

 

Strange coming from Sunny G at least who made a career out of playing the fastest bowlers in his era and built his legacy on it :wall:
 

1 guys who calls it like it is is Sanju and many times he does say the inconvenient truth so fans hate him.  In fact in Wc 2019 I can understand the casual fan but even ICF turned on him when all he said was something ICF was saying 10 years before that :hmmmm2:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

In India, many casual "fans" think that you cannot swing if you try to bowl fast.
They also believe that, line and length is more important than pace.

 

 

 

Then why are they so afraid of phoren phaast bowlers  !

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is particular section of dumb fans who think bowling fast is bowling erratic,but things have changed are changing for good

Ignore those illiterate fans, people want bowlers bowling fast now

I have seen major part of them on YouTube cheering for iur young quicks and they endorse evry rookie gets to play for India as soon as next month,this is excitement

People dont want Boobie anymore,yes particular section is there but they are getting sidelined

Umesh,Aaron are the poster boys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lord said:

 

zero impact. Only because of no early wickets did the openers dominate others. Good for his selection though.

 

 

Even after playing for so many years, it seems no one is scared off his bowling. 
In comparison, bowlers like Shami, Umesh can blow out the opposition when on song.

Bhuvi would have been very useful if had the ability bat at no 7/8. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Problem is ... our selectors and TM prefer economical bowling over wicket taking ability.

 

And they prefer experience and big names.

 

Bhuvi is making his case stronger by saving runs even if it is at the cost of taking wickets.

Boobie will be redundant in Aus for his nature if bowling alone and is/was never a big name to begin with

He was a shadow bowler who operated in someone else's shadow always

Never earned name on his own

Selectors will definitely fool themselves yet again ,hope they send a bigger contingent as he will definitely suck and to manage it we must have true fast bowlers there

Edited by Suhaan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many economical bowlers they want

Bumrah does it way better than him

Infact if they want one more add in Natrajan who can even pick wickets but a washed out and never so good Boobie will only be on a free holiday trip to Australia,he should be asked to retire and better plan for the future as young generation has arrived

Edited by Suhaan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Boobie will be redundant in Aus for his nature if bowling alone and is/was never a big name to begin with

He was a shadow bowler who operated in someone else's shadow always

Never earned name on his own

Selectors will definitely fool themselves yet again ,hope they send a bigger contingent as he will definitely suck and to manage it we must have true fast bowlers there

 

Remember Chetan Sharma's statement after selecting the squad for the last T20 WC.

 

He said something to the tune of ... we first selected the 3 strike bowlers, Bhuvi, Bumrah and Shami and then went on to the all rounders.

 

So, in his mind, Bhuvi, with only 58 wickets from 59 T20Is, is somehow a strike bowler. !!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Remember Chetan Sharma's statement after selecting the squad for the last T20 WC.

 

He said something to the tune of ... we first selected the 3 strike bowlers, Bhuvi, Bumrah and Shami and then went on to the all rounders.

 

So, in his mind, Bhuvi, with only 58 wickets from 59 T20Is, is somehow a strike bowler. !!

 

 

Chetan Sharma definitely is a bevda 2.0 if he can't see Boobie's striking credentials, someone from ICF must ring bells on his ears on twitter before they botch the selections

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Chetan Sharma definitely is a bevda 2.0 if he can't see Boobie's striking credentials, someone from ICF must ring bells on his ears on twitter before they botch the selections

 

Even among the general public who don't watch cricket seriously ( just like our selectors :phehe:  ) ,  Bhuvi is perceived as the ultimate bowler who is better than Hadllee or Marshall. 

 

I don't know why !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Even among the general public who don't watch cricket seriously ( just like our selectors :phehe:  ) ,  Bhuvi is perceived as the ultimate bowler who is better than Hadllee or Marshall. 

 

I don't know why !!

People who casually watch , regular viwers don't bother about him

He's justa nobody,even Vinod Kambli is a bigger name than him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...