Jump to content

Phaast trundlers from Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh


Recommended Posts

we have been the best attack since 2015. in tests. the main format. best in the world. parkies have never been number 1. you wont know that feeling. So you sit down and eat your biryani. 
 
also, learn to bowl with a clean action. 

Triggered :giggle:
Link to comment
we have been the best attack since 2015. in tests. the main format. best in the world. parkies have never been number 1. you wont know that feeling. So you sit down and eat your biryani. 
 
also, learn to bowl with a clean action. 

Oh and as you guys say….don’t trust the speed guns. Probably adding extra 5-10ks for show.
Link to comment
7 minutes ago, cric_fan said:


Oh and as you guys say….don’t trust the speed guns. Probably adding extra 5-10ks for show.

no inbred. only you guys and pussies like aussies pad up speed guns. indians infact will reduce speed because we are realists. richest t20 league would definitely be able to afford legit speed guns. 

 

you guys suck. not my fault. pace was one thing you supposedly had. even that disappeared since 2009 infact. umesh and varun alone bowled quicker than any of your phast trundlers. now piss off. 

Link to comment
no inbred. only you guys and pussies like aussies pad up speed guns. indians infact will reduce speed because we are realists. richest t20 league would definitely be able to afford legit speed guns. 
 
you guys suck. not my fault. pace was one thing you supposedly had. even that disappeared since 2009 infact. umesh and varun alone bowled quicker than any of your phast trundlers. now piss off. 

Can your choker phaaaaast bowlers do this on the world stage?



Link to comment
1 minute ago, cric_fan said:


Can your choker phaaaaast bowlers do this on the world stage?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

its a *ing champions trophy. can your chuckers become world number 1 in tests?

who gives a **** about champions trophy. shove it up your arse. take kohli to pakistan too please. he doesnt belong to india. 

Link to comment
its a *ing champions trophy. can your chuckers become world number 1 in tests?
who gives a **** about champions trophy. shove it up your arse. take kohli to pakistan too please. he doesnt belong to india. 

Ahahaahahah this guy is very angry. Hilarious! Calm down bruv.

….you are not the first country to produce a express pacer…maybe ICC should give you a medal for finally producing one?
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, cric_fan said:


Ahahaahahah this guy is very angry. Hilarious! Calm down bruv.

….you are not the first country to produce a express pacer…maybe ICC should give you a medal for finally producing one?

i am calm bruv. pakistan is the best at chucking yes. 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Norman said:

 

Eng and Nz were garbage back then. Beating them at their home was the equivalent of beating West Indies in WI these days. Try harder. 

 

 

90s england test team was better than the current one or the 2018 one. 

I don't need to try, these are pure facts. 

Link to comment

Kapil Dev is definitely better than Gillispie. He was the highest wicket taker in his time like Anderson is today. I would have him among top 20 greatest bowlers of all-time.

 

Shami will be in the league of Hazelwood and Gillispie.

 

Bumrah, let's wait for 2 more years.

Edited by Majestic
Link to comment
5 hours ago, Adamant said:

Express pacers who averaged below 30 in test cricket - 

Akhtar 25.7

Bond 23

Thomson

Roberts

Holding

And?? 

 


You skipped the fast category 

Ian Bishop 
Dale Steyn
Morne Morkel
Curtly Ambrose was 140-145 when he was young
Glenn Macgrath was fast for most of the years
Damien Fleming IMO was quick as well
Imran Khan was regarded as fast
Allan Donald
Nantie Hayward
Winston Benjamin
Josh Hazelwood
Mitchell Starc
Pat Cummins
 

Edited by singhvivek141
Link to comment
3 hours ago, cric_fan said:


Indians finally start to produce fast bowlers and are getting cocky. Sit down.

Indians produce better Batsman, Spinners and now fast bowlers as well.
We can afford to get cocky as we don't have chuckers like Ajmal, Hasnain, Hafeez or Match Fixers like Amir, Asif, Sharjeel, Salman etc.

Edited by singhvivek141
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Adamant said:

Shami isn't better than Gillespie.

 

Bumrah has played 29 tests, he needs to play atleast 50 before he can be compared. 

Tests
Shami : Strike rate 49
Gillespie : Strike rate 55

ODI 
Shami : Strike rate 27
Gillespie : Strike rate 36

Shami's worst strike rate in tests is in England (67).
Gillespie's worst strike rate in Tests is in NewZealand (91) and Srilanka (73)

Shami defeats Gillespie in terms of Strike rate. He picks up wickets at a faster rate than Gillespie in both tests and ODI's

 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, cric_fan said:


Calm down. Why are you so angry? You like to dish it but can’t take a bit of banter in return?

Umesh & Varun ahahaa. Phuddu bowlers.

Sit down.

You can counter the arguments without using such words against the players.
There is a way to give response to someone, without using abusive words. But it seems you're not inept in it.

Link to comment
You can counter the arguments without using such words against the players.
There is a way to give response to someone, without using abusive words. But it seems you're not inept in it.

Check your mate@Jay derogatory abuse towards me before commenting. Ok?
Link to comment
8 hours ago, Adamant said:

Shami isn't better than Gillespie.

 

Bumrah has played 29 tests, he needs to play atleast 50 before he can be compared. 

shami is better. for 1st half of his career, he played on roads with little to no support. whereas gillespie had outstanding support (warne + mcg + miller/fleming/mcgill/lee) and helpful home pitches.

 

moreover, if we remove bumrah for not playing 50 tests, one should remove shoaib, cummins, bond, etc. since they didn't cross 50 tests as well. 50 is an arbitrary number.

Edited by Vijy
Link to comment
7 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

Tests
Shami : Strike rate 49
Gillespie : Strike rate 55

ODI 
Shami : Strike rate 27
Gillespie : Strike rate 36

Shami's worst strike rate in tests is in England (67).
Gillespie's worst strike rate in Tests is in NewZealand (91) and Srilanka (73)

Shami defeats Gillespie in terms of Strike rate. He picks up wickets at a faster rate than Gillespie in both tests and ODI's

 

Why are you considering strike rates and not averages?

 

If strike rate is the measure then Waqar >Wasim, Mcgrath, Marshall. 

Edited by Adamant
Link to comment
5 hours ago, Vijy said:

shami is better. for 1st half of his career, he played on roads with little to no support. whereas gillespie had outstanding support (warne + mcg + miller/fleming/mcgill/lee) and helpful home pitches.

 

moreover, if we remove bumrah for not playing 50 tests, one should remove shoaib, cummins, bond, etc. since they didn't cross 50 tests as well. 50 is an arbitrary number.

I didn't mention Cummins anywhere. 

Shoaib has played 49, that's good enough. 

Yeah Bond can be excluded, his exclusion actually helps me in my quest to proves medium pacers have done better than express pacers. 

 

 

The support thing can be applied only to some degree, Shami hasn't done well in Eng, Nz even after he got all th support and his overseas stats are way worse than Gillespie. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...