Gollum Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 (edited) Another Udaipur like case Bhalswa Dairy case (from last month) cracked by Delhi Police. Absolutely shocking stuff. These two men, Naushad and Jagjit Singh beheaded a 21 year old kid, lured him from a nearby park and did this act on camera to prove their capability to a Pakistani handler, some LeT guy. Apparently they were tasked to target prominent Hindu leaders and Sikhs who oppose Khalistan movement, they started off by killing some kid just because of a trishul tattoo on his arm Police saying they were inspired by ISIS videos. Naushad has links with Harkat-ul-Ansar, Jagjit Singh from Babbar Khalsa. Both men convicted (life) for multiple terror cases, murders, kidnappings, robberies etc., both jumped parole many times...wonder why milords are always merciful to this kind of scum. Also the Pakistan-Qatar-Canada nexus.... IE Edited January 18, 2023 by Gollum Under_Score and raki05 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vayuu1 Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 Capital punishment,which should be live broadcast around globe to send message to anti india forces Under_Score and raki05 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bharathh Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 Don't see anything on the news on this. Surprising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randomGuy Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 46 minutes ago, bharathh said: Don't see anything on the news on this. Surprising. Agreed very little coverage till now. Imo this would be seen as continuation of recent hindu killings in rajouri. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishra Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 How can a Sardarjis be so heartless and act like this ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattaca Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, mishra said: How can a Sardarjis be so heartless and act like this ? How can you classify sardarjis based on one idiots actions though ? Edited January 18, 2023 by gattaca Under_Score and Khota 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moochad Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 (edited) Nothing new from 2 groups of scums Edited January 18, 2023 by Moochad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishra Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, gattaca said: How can you classify sardarjis based on one idiots actions though ? Bhai, Such a level of brutality and cruelity when you consider the lack of motive (for example torture to get info, or anger) is simply unheard of and not part of our Hindu/Sikh culture or upbringing irrespective of what the background of this person be. I still cant believe it. May be Jagjit Singh was one holding camera. Unless there are new breeds of Sardarji in whom there is not a iota of Hinduism left in their upbringing. I dont know how far Khalistani Sikhs have gone away from their root. Edited January 18, 2023 by mishra raki05 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattaca Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, mishra said: Bhai, Such a level of brutality and cruelity when you consider the lack of motive (for example torture to get info, or anger) is simply unheard of and not part of our Hindu/Sikh culture or upbringing irrespective of what the background of this person be. I still cant believe it. May be Jagjit Singh was one holding camera. Unless there are new breeds of Sardarji in whom there is not an iota of Hinduism left in their upbringing. I dont know how far Khalistani Sikhs have gone away from their root. Humans are brutal and cruel that includes Hindus and Sikhs. We just learn from our upbringing and surroundings. Even he held the camera he is equally guilty. Hindus are involved in riots as well which were bad. I don’t like quote to Churchill but here it goes he mentioned when British were in Afghanistan he mentioned something along lines of Sikhs were more brutal in killing local afghan tribesmen than the tribesmen themselves. Edited January 18, 2023 by gattaca Under_Score 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattaca Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 45 minutes ago, MultiB48 said: Maybe Churchill could have taught them how to kill off millions without any bloodshed. The reason why I didn’t want to quote him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 1 hour ago, gattaca said: Humans are brutal and cruel that includes Hindus and Sikhs. We just learn from our upbringing and surroundings. Even he held the camera he is equally guilty. Hindus are involved in riots as well which were bad. I don’t like quote to Churchill but here it goes he mentioned when British were in Afghanistan he mentioned something along lines of Sikhs were more brutal in killing local afghan tribesmen than the tribesmen themselves. Afghans &, Sikhs were sworn bitter enemies... British used this animosity very well during their times. Also the reprisals in Punjab were quite brutal during the partition in fact they were the defining blows... There is a reason Pakistani army & ISI rabidly hates Indian Punjab. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khota Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 11 hours ago, mishra said: How can a Sardarjis be so heartless and act like this ? That has nothing to do with Sikhs. Death penalty for a crime like this is needed. Under_Score 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bsriharsha Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 Utter scum, No point wasting public money keeping them in Jail. Send them to Hang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattaca Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 20 minutes ago, Under_Score said: Generalization by many against minorities in a country like India is no surprise.....I totally agree with death penalty for the scumbag who did this heinous crime. Many didn’t generalize though ? West has more generalizations than India. India is home to more religions for centuries than west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordPrabhzy Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 (edited) 4 hours ago, Under_Score said: I didn't mention about generalization on ICF....I have experienced generalization myself when I lived in India during the 80s when Delhi & Kanpur burnt with anti-Sikh genocide.....How many Congress Leaders and their paid goons were brought to justice for killing 3000 plus innocent Sikhs of Delhi who had nothing to do with Punjab extremism........the whole massacre was the result of generalization of Sikhs.... There.. fixed it for you Edited January 19, 2023 by LordPrabhzy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randomGuy Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishra Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 (edited) 17 hours ago, MultiB48 said: Maybe Churchill could have taught them how to kill off millions without any bloodshed. Yes, Bengal Famine. India was part of UK Territory and its citizens were subservient to Parliament and queen (Not East India Company), while India Parliament was part of British System. Quote Beginning as early as December 1942, high-ranking government officials and military officers (including John Herbert, the Governor of Bengal; Viceroy Linlithgow; Leo Amery the Secretary of State for India; General Claude Auchinleck, Commander-in-Chief of British forces in India,[217] and Admiral Louis Mountbatten, Supreme Commander of South-East Asia[218]) began requesting food imports for India through government and military channels, but for months these requests were either rejected or reduced to a fraction of the original amount by Churchill's War Cabinet.[219] The colony was also not permitted to spend its own sterling reserves, or even use its own ships, to import food.[220] Although Viceroy Linlithgow appealed for imports from mid-December 1942, he did so on the understanding that the military would be given preference over civilians.[Q] The Secretary of State for India, Leo Amery, was on one side of a cycle of requests for food aid and subsequent refusals from the British War Cabinet that continued through 1943 and into 1944.[221] Amery did not mention worsening conditions in the countryside, stressing that Calcutta's industries must be fed or its workers would return to the countryside. Rather than meeting this request, the UK promised a relatively small amount of wheat that was specifically intended for western India (that is, not for Bengal) in exchange for an increase in rice exports from Bengal to Ceylon. Edited January 19, 2023 by mishra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khota Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 6 hours ago, gattaca said: Many didn’t generalize though ? West has more generalizations than India. India is home to more religions for centuries than west. Just because you did generalize and acted properly does not mean masses did not do the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khota Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 Just now, Khota said: Just because you did not generalize and acted properly does not mean masses did not do the same. I mean did not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khota Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 Not only these goons should be hung the people who provide the money should be brought to justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts