Chakdephatte Posted Wednesday at 10:20 AM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 10:20 AM 17 hours ago, Lord said: the ODIs are too much batsmen oriented, specially in India. So becomes difficult to rate such innings too high. NZ were also without Southee,Boult and Sodhi. I'd say even 50s have been better Yes but pressure was created by the other end. It would have been an average innings if he had got any support. He had to make he does not get out but also to finish that up. About bowlers, they were doing well before he started hitting them. Others had a strike rate of 50 against Santner, Gill butchered him alone. Link to comment
speedracer Posted Wednesday at 02:33 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 02:33 PM 22 hours ago, Lord said: the ODIs are too much batsmen oriented, specially in India. So becomes difficult to rate such innings too high. NZ were also without Southee,Boult and Sodhi. I'd say even 50s have been better No siraj No bumrah No pant No iyer Would even say no jaddu Link to comment
Lord Posted Wednesday at 03:38 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 03:38 PM 5 hours ago, Chakdephatte said: Yes but pressure was created by the other end. It would have been an average innings if he had got any support. He had to make he does not get out but also to finish that up. About bowlers, they were doing well before he started hitting them. Others had a strike rate of 50 against Santner, Gill butchered him alone. yeah sure it was a very good innings because of reasons you mentioned. One of best ever by Indian? I'm not sure Link to comment
Lord Posted Wednesday at 03:39 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 03:39 PM 1 hour ago, speedracer said: No siraj No bumrah No pant No iyer Would even say no jaddu no Bhuvi and Rahane too Link to comment
speedracer Posted Wednesday at 08:40 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 08:40 PM 5 hours ago, Lord said: no Bhuvi and Rahane too Yea for nz Link to comment
