Chakdephatte Posted January 25, 2023 Author Share Posted January 25, 2023 17 hours ago, Lord said: the ODIs are too much batsmen oriented, specially in India. So becomes difficult to rate such innings too high. NZ were also without Southee,Boult and Sodhi. I'd say even 50s have been better Yes but pressure was created by the other end. It would have been an average innings if he had got any support. He had to make he does not get out but also to finish that up. About bowlers, they were doing well before he started hitting them. Others had a strike rate of 50 against Santner, Gill butchered him alone. Link to comment
speedracer Posted January 25, 2023 Share Posted January 25, 2023 22 hours ago, Lord said: the ODIs are too much batsmen oriented, specially in India. So becomes difficult to rate such innings too high. NZ were also without Southee,Boult and Sodhi. I'd say even 50s have been better No siraj No bumrah No pant No iyer Would even say no jaddu Link to comment
Lord Posted January 25, 2023 Share Posted January 25, 2023 5 hours ago, Chakdephatte said: Yes but pressure was created by the other end. It would have been an average innings if he had got any support. He had to make he does not get out but also to finish that up. About bowlers, they were doing well before he started hitting them. Others had a strike rate of 50 against Santner, Gill butchered him alone. yeah sure it was a very good innings because of reasons you mentioned. One of best ever by Indian? I'm not sure Link to comment
Lord Posted January 25, 2023 Share Posted January 25, 2023 1 hour ago, speedracer said: No siraj No bumrah No pant No iyer Would even say no jaddu no Bhuvi and Rahane too Link to comment
speedracer Posted January 25, 2023 Share Posted January 25, 2023 5 hours ago, Lord said: no Bhuvi and Rahane too Yea for nz Link to comment
Autonomous Posted January 29, 2023 Share Posted January 29, 2023 I think Virat's t20 innings against us in this world cup was super good - batting conditions were also difficult. 183 in asia cup was also good but that wicket was belter for batting. Link to comment
putrevus Posted January 29, 2023 Share Posted January 29, 2023 Kishen's 200 was far more impressive than this innings. It is not even close Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now