Lone Wolf Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Farooqa compared him with Shankracharya... One thing is certain RaGa is surely a Brand... Doubt any other leader from opposition can dream about such a grand welcome. Imagine Nitish or Mamta here, People won't bother to wave at them. Not even Kejriwal can match this. Vijy and mishra 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted January 20 Author Share Posted January 20 Raut also there... RaGa looks like Forrest Gump at this rate... Better portrayal than Aamir Khan. nevada 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattaca Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 (edited) Too bad he is just not a leader. He has no idea what india is or how to rule. I have my reservations against BJP giving fair share to states. BJP knows how to represent india at global stage. I liked how they stood ground when they were pitted against Russia and understood what is good for Indian people geopolitics always change. RAGA interview are too funny to even consider him a candidate. Adding music is useless when you don’t have stuff. But RAGA is another Rajeev or worse who created the Kashmir issue to begin with. Edited January 20 by gattaca nevada 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted January 20 Author Share Posted January 20 (edited) 51 minutes ago, gattaca said: Too bad he is just not a leader. He has no idea what india is or how to rule. I have my reservations against BJP giving fair share to states. BJP knows how to represent india at global stage. I liked how they stood ground when they were pitted against Russia and understood what is good for Indian people geopolitics always change. RAGA interview are too funny to even consider him a candidate. Adding music is useless when you don’t have stuff. But RAGA is another Rajeev or worse who created the Kashmir issue to begin with. I think both Modi & Rahul have round about same IQ. They both talk nonsense from time to time. If Modi holds PC he will show that side even more. Congress have fair share of running the country unlike Aap or Mamta. They do have competent leaders. He would be his Mother's puppet like Manmohan though. Further Modi has lost that charm in his old age now. I would very much prefer Congress over Aapians or clowns like Nitish Mamta. Indian foreign policy is still same like 70's or 90's. Opportunistic like it should be for a growing country. Congress is a little more chaotic & risk taking looking at history. Modi plays it safe mostly. Both internally & externally. Further Modi looks like on his last leg. His successors won't have that appeal among voters. RaGa has a chance in future. Congress needs to keep strengthening its grass root work. They have successfully demolished AAP in JK & HP realizing the mistake they made in Punjab. Edited January 20 by Lone Wolf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MultiB48 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Kashmir is such a useless state i dont know why we keep it ,you keep spending money on it and have to turn it into a police sate to keep the peace .This parasitic state serves no purpose ,all it does is fester communal tensions in the rest of the country. sukhoi 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MultiB48 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Raut is one handsome uncle ,has some popeye arms on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted January 20 Author Share Posted January 20 (edited) 6 minutes ago, MultiB48 said: Kashmir is such a useless state i dont know why we keep it ,you keep spending money on it and have to turn it into a police sate to keep the peace .This parasitic state serves no purpose ,all it does is fester communal tensions in the rest of the country. Yep lose all that water & natural barrier & live forever in danger of Chinese & Pakistani invasion or see Terrorists roaming in Himachal or Punjab lol. Very sound idea indeed. Patel wanted to exchange Kashmir with Hyderabad but after a month he changed his stance as someone knocked some sense into him. After that he desperately wanted to keep Kashmir at all costs. Edited January 20 by Lone Wolf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MultiB48 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 1 minute ago, Lone Wolf said: Yep lose all that water & natural barrier & live forever in danger of Chinese & Pakistani invasion or see Terrorists roaming in Himachal or Punjab lol. Very sound idea indeed. Patel wanted to exchange Kashmir with Hyderabad but after a month he changed his stance as someone knocked some sense into him. After that he desperately wanted to keep Kashmir at all costs. Thats what i said, the state is a festering wound on us ,it will suck our resources and blackmail us with security threats. Most of the water comes from underground water and rain and nukes are these to deal with any major invasions . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MultiB48 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 They had kept those areas where abdullah had influence ,he didnt want to lose his base and india also kept the territory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted January 20 Author Share Posted January 20 11 minutes ago, MultiB48 said: Thats what i said, the state is a festering wound on us ,it will suck our resources and blackmail us with security threats. Most of the water comes from underground water and rain and nukes are these to deal with any major invasions . Nah It's a insurance policy against Pakistan... We got their lifeline in our hands. Without those rivers Pakistani Punjab would be desert. We are right at their necks. Pakistan wanted to divert all water that into its territory. They never cared for Kashmir specifically. Overall if we do capture PoK back in a couple of decades as India goes stronger we could access Central Asia & Caucasia. Massive boost geopoltically. Xinjiang is a load on Chinese as well but it offers them same reach like JK does to India. There are both Pro & Cons but Pros are overwhelmingly on our side keeping JK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted January 20 Author Share Posted January 20 (edited) Kanhaiya is also there... Everyone wants to shine itself in glory. Kinda like Modi Advani did back when they came to hoist Tri color in Lal Chowk. Political gold mine. Congis have planned something grand as well with a huge roadshow in Srinagar of all places. RaGa is targeting 26th January. Edited January 20 by Lone Wolf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MultiB48 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 13 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: Nah It's a insurance policy against Pakistan... We got their lifeline in our hands. Without those rivers Pakistani Punjab would be desert. We are right at their necks. Pakistan wanted to divert all water that into its territory. They never cared for Kashmir specifically. Overall if we do capture PoK back in a couple of decades as India goes stronger we could access Central Asia & Caucasia. Massive boost geopoltically. Xinjiang is a load on Chinese as well but it offers them same reach like JK does to India. There are both Pro & Cons but Pros are overwhelmingly on our side keeping JK. Floods in Pakistan cause enough damage ,how much more water do they need . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattaca Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 1 hour ago, MultiB48 said: Thats what i said, the state is a festering wound on us ,it will suck our resources and blackmail us with security threats. Most of the water comes from underground water and rain and nukes are these to deal with any major invasions . Border states are always problem when you have bad neighbors. Pakistan will irrelevant soon but china is a bigger threat on eastern border. We are going to have these issues. We have to deal with them nothing we can do apart from investing and protecting. It’s cost for a country to protect itself from neighbors if you look at Israel it so surrounded by hostile countries they invest in military. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted January 20 Author Share Posted January 20 Indeed BJY has established Ra Ga as the face of the opposition. Nitish Mamta can't match his stardom at least for now. Too bad Congis were sleeping for most part of last 10 years... Gave a free run to BJP even didn't cashed on their blunders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattaca Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: Indeed BJY has established Ra Ga as the face of the opposition. Nitish Mamta can't match his stardom at least for now. Too bad Congis were sleeping for most part of last 10 years... Gave a free run to BJP even didn't cashed on their blunders. I would say this is better for BJP as congress will feel the need to go alone and this is where split of votes happens. Edited January 20 by gattaca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravishingravi Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 It has been an interesting brand building exercise. Too bad the product is not good enough. But it's a good attempt nonetheless. India needs alternatives. But congress is not the preferred option. nevada 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravishingravi Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Won't be surprised if this being secretly funded by BJP. Keeping RG active and congress alive is in their best interest. Lord 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 7 hours ago, MultiB48 said: Kashmir is such a useless state i dont know why we keep it ,you keep spending money on it and have to turn it into a police sate to keep the peace .This parasitic state serves no purpose ,all it does is fester communal tensions in the rest of the country. Highland , water source, intersection of china india and former soviet union but even if it was not india is legal suzerain of the land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jf1gp_1 Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 12 hours ago, MultiB48 said: Kashmir is such a useless state i dont know why we keep it ,you keep spending money on it and have to turn it into a police sate to keep the peace .This parasitic state serves no purpose ,all it does is fester communal tensions in the rest of the country. I wont go as far as calling it a useless state but I no longer want PoK to be part of India. Most feel that way but unwilling to say it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted January 21 Author Share Posted January 21 11 minutes ago, jf1gp_1 said: I wont go as far as calling it a useless state but I no longer want PoK to be part of India. Most feel that way but unwilling to say it. I would want it... But we are not capable enough right now with China on our necks at the border. Waiting for a slip up. I think it would be better if we invest in our Navy first & build a few bases in IOR. Path to PoK has always gone through Pak Punjab anyways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts