Jump to content

Venky declares Jihad against KL Rahul !!!


velu

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Bigg Brother said:

Chopra is stuck here. He thought Venktesh Bhai won't confront him and he will try to look different by backing KLR... But looks like VP is going to strangle both KLR and Chopra till their last breath.. Chopra is clearly looking like fool here, even if KLR scores century in next test, VP's point still stands. He has been medicore for so long..

 

Link to comment
9 hours ago, wanted_desi said:

 

Bhajji is sore loser! Why are all these ex cricketers so salty about it? V Prasad is giving his POV using averages etc etc. 

 

The point of ex cricketers isn't just to kiss ass of current players so they can do interviews etc with them when time comes. 

 

Problem are the abusive fanbases of these sooperstars who do maa-behen on SM to any expert who criticizes them. By far the worst gutter rats are the Kohli fanbois. 

 

 

The ex-cricketers are too scared of this toxic bullying and thus don't speak their mind. Gambhir is the only ex-cricketer I know who has openly criticized both Dhoni & Kohli and subsequently coped online abuses for it. The rest just keep mum. 

 

 

Link to comment
57 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Even after Rahul Dravid cheering for Shubman Gill's outrageous dominant shot making in recent times, if he selects timid out of form KL Rahul then he should be called out too.  Gill may or may not click. But he should be given another opportunity to take his LOI form into Tests.  Only person who has the capacity to replace Kohli is Gill. Sooner they bring him in is the better. May be that is why they don't bring him in.

 

One thing Australia did really well when they were a dominant force is that they would bring on one or two players when they were winning.


It has a two fold effect, the young player gains experience from the mature players and also gets use to a winning environment. Not to mention the transition from domestic to a winning international team is a lot easier and smooth.


What Dravid, Fatman, TM and BCCI are doing is at the detriment of Mother India. They are keeping players in the team that do not deserve to be there and in the future, India will suffer as a result when all the good players are gone and no one to come up.

Link to comment

While these two are acting as if they are selectors, none of them have a strong influence on selections. 

 

PS  Sunil Shetty, after getting involved with Aakash, would have tried to motivate KL to lift his game. However, even that could put pressure on KL as now he would think even Sunil is watching him! 

 

 

 

Edited by zen
Link to comment

https://sports.ndtv.com/india-vs-australia-2023/should-kl-rahul-be-dropped-from-indias-test-team-heres-what-chat-gpt-thinks-3803437

Should KL Rahul Be Dropped From India's Test Team? Here's What ChatGPT Thinks

 

Answer: "As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or biases about specific individuals or teams. However, as a general rule, the decision to drop a player from a team should be based on their recent performance and fitness, and whether their skills and abilities are in line with the team's requirements.

If KL Rahul's recent performances in Test matches have been consistently below par, and there are other players in the squad who can potentially perform better in his position, then the team management may consider dropping him from the team. However, if he has been performing well and his skills are deemed to be important for the team's strategy, then he may be retained in the squad.

 

Ultimately, team selection decisions are made by the team management based on a variety of factors, including player form, fitness, and tactical considerations, and are subject to change based on evolving circumstances."

 

 
Link to comment
1 hour ago, sage said:

https://sports.ndtv.com/india-vs-australia-2023/should-kl-rahul-be-dropped-from-indias-test-team-heres-what-chat-gpt-thinks-3803437

Should KL Rahul Be Dropped From India's Test Team? Here's What ChatGPT Thinks

 

Answer: "As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or biases about specific individuals or teams. However, as a general rule, the decision to drop a player from a team should be based on their recent performance and fitness, and whether their skills and abilities are in line with the team's requirements.

If KL Rahul's recent performances in Test matches have been consistently below par, and there are other players in the squad who can potentially perform better in his position, then the team management may consider dropping him from the team. However, if he has been performing well and his skills are deemed to be important for the team's strategy, then he may be retained in the squad.

 

Ultimately, team selection decisions are made by the team management based on a variety of factors, including player form, fitness, and tactical considerations, and are subject to change based on evolving circumstances."

 

 

ChatGPT gave a very politican-like answer instead of saying that kela should be dropped.

Link to comment
On 2/21/2023 at 10:18 AM, Gollum said:

Any source to back this up?

source? what sort of "source" do you want? The guy in his own defense that he wasn't as 'focused' as Kumble etc.  I have been following cricket since the 90s - Ramesh's laziness and 'attitude' wasn't a secret back then.  If somebody as reticent and diplomatic as John Wright alludes to it, I mean.  It is what it is.  

 

On 2/21/2023 at 10:14 AM, Gollum said:

Ramesh vs Pak in 1999 was amazing, among all Indian batters he played Akram and Saqlain the best, top tier batting. No contest between him and Chopra. Deserved a longer career for sure. 

 

Wasim Akram talked about this in one of his interviews.  Pak bowlers loved the SG ball used in that series - after about 10 overs of use that ball use to start reversing.  He even says that they were happy to concede a few boundaries with the new ball early, because that just meant that the ball got scuffed up that much quicker.

 

Yes, following that series then, it got the blood pumping to watch Ramesh get off to those quick starts, hitting the new ball for boundaries while tense Indian fans stressed about the pace threat of Waqar and Wasim.  But context matters.  Was Ramesh talented? Yes - he was the precursor to Sehwag, but paled in comparison to Veeru, both in terms of talent, application and output.  Comparing him to Chopra is flawed from the get go.  Given Veeru's emergence as a quick scoring opener unafraid to take risks, India needed the second opener to be a foil, someone who was ready to do the hard yards and grind against the new ball.  Not to say Chopra was good enough - he clearly was not.  But there was no way to know that without giving him a run.  So it wasn't as cut and dried as you are making it sound in hindsight.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...