vvvslaxman Posted May 3 Author Posted May 3 56 minutes ago, rkt.india said: What someone did in 2-3 innings doesn't prove anything. Prospects need to be taken in a long term view. Sundar was always a batter first, that too long form, was turned into a bowler by IPL teams. Reddy is a teen prodigy since his u16 days and made his FC debut too early. So it's too early to judge his success or failure. SUndar is way below Sai Sudarshan in terms of technique and skill. Probably Sai Sudarshan has the best reaction game i have seen from an Indian batsman in ages. Jaiswal is another guy. Especially the wrist adjustment through off side to find gaps is so natural. That is why pretty much every non-Indian observers instantly consider him as test prospect. There is an air of safetiness in the way he bats.
vvvslaxman Posted May 3 Author Posted May 3 48 minutes ago, cricspirit said: Sarfaraz was always a stop gap kind of deal. Limited and fat. He has intent but gets stuck too. He won't serve at international level for long. But Sarfraz was supposed to be a prodigy from Mumbai school of batsmanship. But i say Raghuvanshi has a way better claim in that regard. He also plays very close to the body.
Ultimate_Game Posted May 3 Posted May 3 10 hours ago, bowl_out said: Add KKR to that list with Gambhir influence. CSK doesn't have anyone who can be backed. They are full of players who were in contention 5-10 years ago TBF KKR hasn't had a useless player being picked. Varun C was unfairly dropped and had to top bowling in 2 IPLs to get back. Harshit should've gotten a debut much earlier. In fact even Venky Iyer shouldn't have been dropped when he wad to make way for the stars. I don't see a single KKR player who had it easy. They've had to perform and had to wait longer than most to make it and some of them still couldn't.
Recommended Posts