Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, ravishingravi said:

 

Ah yes Arya putra has arrived finnally into the discussion.

Is Arya putra better than beetch putra?

 

I did not know you were the mod and decides who comes into any debate.

 

Moreover, you never had the decency to debate, all you do is hurl abuses.

Posted
2 hours ago, zen said:

Bharat and India are the two "official" names of the country. It is more about giving more preference to one name over the other. 

That is all correct.

 

Why are they making a big deal now all of a sudden.

Posted
2 hours ago, jalebi_bhai said:

Btw, Anurag Thakur has come out and termed this as speculation. 

This is a done deal. That is how BJP operates.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Khota said:

That is all correct.

 

Why are they making a big deal now all of a sudden.

 

I am not following the topic in detail but maybe the "issue" was created by those who were surprised at the use of Bharat on the G20 invite as if Bharat is not an official name:

 

s1-1693918695.jpg?resize=770,513&quality

 

The use of the President of Bharat is totally fine. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, ravishingravi said:

Love it how Sanyal rios apart the other guy. 

 

 

 

The level of intellect if you can call it, of Devdutt is so pedestrian. Stupid one keeps repeating Brahminical  like lemurian crypto. They are devoid of any argument. Vedas was supposedly written or dictated by Vyas muni, is not even a Brahmin. Jains and Buddhists were differences in interpretations of philosophy of Vedanta (Upanishad) were debated and argued under the umbrella of sanatan dharma. He’s trained under western indology (Wendy Doinger etc) which says Jains and Buddhists were against Vedas and are good, and Vedas are bad. Idiots still believes in aryans like a Christian missionary. Bombay comes from mispronunciation of Mumbai by goras, doesn’t make Bombay any more Indian than Mumbai. Greeks and Persians mispronounced Sindhu as Hindu/Indu/India doesn’t make India as indigenous as Bharat itself. 

Posted
7 hours ago, zen said:

 

I am not following the topic in detail but maybe the "issue" was created by those who were surprised at the use of Bharat on the G20 invite as if Bharat is not an official name:

 

s1-1693918695.jpg?resize=770,513&quality

 

The use of the President of Bharat is totally fine. 

Why is it being pushed now points to the ulterior motives of a party that is about to lose.

Posted
5 hours ago, Khota said:

Why is it being pushed now points to the ulterior motives of a party that is about to lose.

Who :cantstop:

 

The timing is indeed dubious & looks like a poll stunt. This will backfire on them like 2004 if they're not gonna reverse course big time!

Posted
21 minutes ago, ravishingravi said:

 

What is being pushed ? Its already in constitution.

It is in the constitution, but they are making big deal about it now. You know the reason but telling the truth is not your forte.

Posted
40 minutes ago, Khota said:

It is in the constitution, but they are making big deal about it now. You know the reason but telling the truth is not your forte.

 

Ignorance is your forte. Govt has said no name change. If people are speculating, thats on them.

Posted
14 hours ago, ravishingravi said:

 

Ignorance is your forte. Govt has said no name change. If people are speculating, thats on them.

Misleading is your forte.

Can you back your statement or just hot air as usual.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, goose said:

Do we really want to hear the rest of the world call us something they can’t pronounce?

 

Pre-2014, Modi can't speak English well, was seen as one valid reason to not vote him.

 

This inferiority complex is pathetic. And India as a name is one representation of ourselves from the western lens. We need our own prospective, our own independent thinking from the dharmic eyes. Analyze both the world, and ourselves , free of the inferiority complex and western bias.

×
×
  • Create New...