Jump to content

Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! Let's all laugh at the padosis :)


Recommended Posts

Posted
21 hours ago, RizBarKhan said:

Great. Bangladesh are a brotherly country, it’s about time they toured.  

How is your country reacting to amazing Olympic victory and athletic tradition? Any lessons India can learn from China Pakistan USA etc who manage to get Olympic gold medals, how can India get better in Olympics? Please educate the forum. Cheers and congratulations on your countries great achievement.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, RizBarKhan said:

Then why do you hate Bangladeshis? 

Who said I hat them. 

Also you are the types who split motherland because your religion could not stay with Hindus.

 

Battle for cricket supremacy going on in PawalRindi

Edited by LM16
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Vilander said:

How is your country reacting to amazing Olympic victory and athletic tradition? Any lessons India can learn from China Pakistan USA etc who manage to get Olympic gold medals, how can India get better in Olympics? Please educate the forum. Cheers and congratulations on your countries great achievement.

Unironically, you just need to stay positive and not view sports as some great show of nationalism otherwise you’re gonna put too much pressure on yourself and your athletes. On another note, I think India should probably build more training and scouting facilities up north closer to the Pakistan border, that’s your best bet.

Edited by RizBarKhan
Posted
1 hour ago, LM16 said:

Who said I hat them. 

Also you are the types who split motherland because your religion could not stay with Hindus.

 

Battle for cricket supremacy going on in PawalRindi

Man I don’t know how old you are but I wasn’t alive in ‘47 or ‘71 :laugh:, you must be like Biden’s age if these events are still relevant for you.

Posted
19 minutes ago, RizBarKhan said:

Man I don’t know how old you are but I wasn’t alive in ‘47 or ‘71 :laugh:, you must be like Biden’s age if these events are still relevant for you.

Well most of us ain't alive in 712 CE as well when Bin Qasim attacked on Sindh.

 

Yet almost 99% of the people of Pakistan still follows Bin Qasim, ditching the thousand year old history of their cultural heritage. As per you it too shouldn't be relevant now...isn't it.

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Then why your Army General kicked them out from Pakistan ?

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/6/30/pakistan-to-start-second-phase-of-afghan-deportations

Well that’s disgusting and most Pakistanis fervently opposed this, you have to separate the people from the government/establishment. Personally I believe we should’ve granted all Afghan refugees citizenship and ideally keep an open border once we resolve our decades-long disputes with the Afghan govt.

Edited by RizBarKhan
Posted
8 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Well most of us ain't alive in 712 CE as well when Bin Qasim attacked on Sindh.

 

Yet almost 99% of the people of Pakistan still follows Bin Qasim, ditching the thousand year old history of their cultural heritage. As per you it too shouldn't be relevant now...isn't it.

Yeah so if that’s the case then why do you even care about what happened 1300 years ago and whatever Pakistan chooses to teach in schools. I doubt you’re from anywhere near Sindh anyways.

Posted
6 minutes ago, RizBarKhan said:

Well that’s disgusting and most Pakistanis fervently opposed this, you have to separate the people from the government/establishment. Personally I believe we should’ve granted all Afghan refugees citizenship and ideally keep an open border once we resolve our decades-long disputes with the Afghan govt.

It's easier said that done.

 

I'm not sure if you know, but many of these refugees were from Pashtun fraternity which moved to Pak when Afghanistan was in turmoil courtesy of US using it as their battle ground vs USSR (something which triggered the collapse of Afg).

 

Also traditionally, Afghans used to have the border till KPK, the British Indian territory doesn't include that.

Now Afghans & Taliban sees KPK as their own part and don't agree with the international boundary which was drawn by British. If you will open the borders, it will be a huge risk for your internal security. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, RizBarKhan said:

Yeah so if that’s the case then why do you even care about what happened 1300 years ago and whatever Pakistan chooses to teach in schools. I doubt you’re from anywhere near Sindh anyways.

 

I think you know the answer, else Kashmir issue would have been solved long back.

 

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

It's easier said that done.

 

I'm not sure if you know, but many of these refugees were from Pashtun fraternity which moved to Pak when Afghanistan was in turmoil courtesy of US using it as their battle ground vs USSR (something which triggered the collapse of Afg).

 

Also traditionally, Afghans used to have the border till KPK, the British Indian territory doesn't include that.

Now Afghans & Taliban sees KPK as their own part and don't agree with the international boundary which was drawn by British. If you will open the borders, it will be a huge risk for your internal security. 

Yes, most of the refugees were Pashtuns from Afg but also many Tajiks, Uzbeks and Hazaras - they came to Pakistan due to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and we opened our borders to them as they were facing tryanny from the Red army and their PDPA puppets who were carrying out some of the most gruesome war crimes. 
 

Indeed Afghanistan did have a pretty large land mass stretching well beyond its current geography, during the Durrani empire the entirety of present-day Pakistan was under Afghanistan, they lost a lot of land to the short-lived Sikh kingdom. I think if we resolve all of our long standing conflicts then we can have peace between Pak and Afg thus an open border wouldn’t be an issue, it’s a long shot but hopefully we can achieve peace and a Schengen zone type of agreement with Afghanistan, that’s the only solution.

Edited by RizBarKhan
Posted
50 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

 

I think you know the answer, else Kashmir issue would have been solved long back.

 

I don’t think either of those are even remotely correlated.

Posted
1 hour ago, RizBarKhan said:

Man I don’t know how old you are but I wasn’t alive in ‘47 or ‘71 :laugh:, you must be like Biden’s age if these events are still relevant for you.

47 is not relevant? Splitting the motherland because of religion will always be relevant. For you and for us also.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, RizBarKhan said:

Man I don’t know how old you are but I wasn’t alive in ‘47 or ‘71 :laugh:, you must be like Biden’s age if these events are still relevant for you.

You must be 1400 years old then. Are horses flying in your country?

Posted
1 minute ago, LM16 said:

47 is not relevant? Splitting the motherland because of religion will always be relevant. For you and for us also.

 

 

It’s in the past, I don’t see any benefit in dwelling in the past. Borders change all the time. We’re now two sovereign countries that have charted separate paths and have developed independent identities. Focusing on the present is much better.

Posted
55 minutes ago, RizBarKhan said:

Yes, most of the refugees were Pashtuns from Afg but also many Tajiks, Uzbeks and Hazaras - they came to Pakistan due to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and we opened our borders to them as they were facing tryanny from the Red army and their PDPA puppets who were carrying out some of the most gruesome war crimes. 
 

Indeed Afghanistan did have a pretty large land mass stretching well beyond its current geography, during the Durrani empire the entirety of present-day Pakistan was under Afghanistan, they lost a lot of land to the short-lived Sikh kingdom. I think if we resolve all of our long standing conflicts then we can have peace between Pak and Afg thus an open border wouldn’t be an issue, it’s a long shot but hopefully we can achieve peace and a Schengen zone type of agreement with Afghanistan, that’s the only solution.

Schengen is successful in Europe because of 2 critical reasons

 

1. Most of the countries are small in size, and hence face shortage of manpower. Hence this arrangement was carried over to manage the impact. Hence richer nations like Luxembourg, Netherlands, France, Germany etc has a lot of working class from relatively backward nations like Hungary, Romania, Albania.

 

2. Europe post the industrial revolution is no more dominated by religion, yes, on paper it's a Christian majority continent. But the practices like witchcraft were abandoned once Industrial Revolution happened. Europe is lot liberal now.

 

Both Afg & Pak are poor nations, even if you open boundaries, it won't make a major shift, rather it will spread the issues in a bigger land mass as Pak nationals wont accept Afghans snatching their jobs and vice versa. Unless rich middle east countries like UAE, Oman, Saudi, Bahrain etc open borders, things won't work. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...