Jump to content

Moving Forward What Are Your Suggestion.


Khota

Recommended Posts

Posted

Get all-rounders. Travis head, Mitch Marsh, Maxwell. Three batting all-rounders 

 

If you are going to argue about how Travis didn't take dozen 5fers and 15 centuries so he is not an all-rounder, you just don't understand cricket. Its a game of fine margins. Two economical overs in the middle can have impact. One fluke wicket can turn a match on its head. Just accept it or argue with a wall 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Serpico said:

Get all-rounders. Travis head, Mitch Marsh, Maxwell. Three batting all-rounders 

 

If you are going to argue about how Travis didn't take dozen 5fers and 15 centuries so he is not an all-rounder, you just don't understand cricket. Its a game of fine margins. Two economical overs in the middle can have impact. One fluke wicket can turn a match on its head. Just accept it or argue with a wall 

Let Analytics settle that debate. Fluke is not what you need for wins. No allrounders.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Khota said:

Let Analytics settle that debate. Fluke is not what you need for wins. No allrounders.

Analytics only gets you so far, if you depend on it too much you're too dope to win anything any way!

Posted

the solution cannot be cricket based. in a final you are always liable to come up against an opponent that is prepapred to gamble. we have to be braver than everyone else. rohit did this admirably. at least one player at the crease must play that way all down the order. the problem was not him holing out, it was 10 others not prepared to

Posted

Select a 15 member squad and actually play them equally . Make decisions that put you out of your comfort zone … be prepared to lose when doesn’t matter … 

Posted

First kindly develop batting depth...without comprising on bowlers.

Batting depth should be till no 9, even no 8 won't work.

In 2007 T20 WC and 2011 ODI WC we had likes of Agarkar, Bhajji, Ashwin coming at no 9...all 3 of them were capable batters.

 

Secondly, just like bowlers are expected to bat..atleast 2 batters from top 6 should be capable of bowling 4-6 overs in a match. I dont agree with DK's comment here.

Posted
25 minutes ago, goose said:

the problem was not him holing out, it was 10 others not prepared to

Nope, was definitely a problem! We had 99 other problems that game but he was also one of them!

Posted

IF BCCI & selectors are serious , then they should start planning for 2027 from the 1st day post WC2023. 

1. Next WC is in 2027 , Hence all 33-34 year olds  almost certainly cannot be contenders for a place .Do not play any of them in 50 overs match from this day . 

2. Select new bunch of players so that new players in final 16 will have played at least 30 odd games before WC.

3. Since WC in SA, give priority to batters who play pace bowling well . 

4. Play Shreyas in most of the SENA matches and come to conclusion if he can counter pacers without any weakness .

5. Make at least 2 main batters to bowl  -Gill & Tilak.

6. Find bowling all rounders so that we have batting depth till no.8.

7. Develop 5 pacers who can bowl 140+ with control & seam movement .

8. have a back up for Hardik. 

9. New coaching set up. 

More than anything remove the fear factor from players , encourage them to play aggressively irrespective of results for next 3-4 years .  If they have talent , doing the same thing again & again will make them fine tune their game and start succeeding . Do not want to see a scenario of 3 boundaries in 30 overs again in Wc game !. Better you go down attacking than this kind of game. 

 

 

 

Posted
38 minutes ago, Number said:

Jadeja should never bat in top 7 in ODI/T20s. 

Either we find his replacement who can bat in top 7 like Abhishek Sharma/Riyan Parag.

Or he bats at 8. 

 

Jadeja's time is done. There's no upside with him other than his fielding.

Posted
49 minutes ago, tweaker said:

Introduce young players,who are multi dimensional.ie Jaiswal,Rinku,Tilak,Parag,Sudharshan etc.

 

Groom replacement for Shami,Bumrah.

 

Also ask them to bowl regularly and not become one dimensional once they seal their position in the side 

Posted
1 hour ago, Serpico said:

Australia did analytics which is why they picked all-rounders

You don't need analytics to know that batting allrounders are important. 

 

They won 6 World Cups with similar combinations. 

 

India has used quite a bit of analytics since Dravid joined 

 

Much more so than under Kohli and Shastri. 

 

Taking this approach forward would require planning for 2027 South Africa by doing a thorough analysis of what conditions offer there,  finding data on possible options in domestic and investing in them, starting now. 

 

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, cricketfan28 said:

Lower expectations, WI is not friendly for us.

No. we have to make better team which has better skill to play on WI/SA /AUS or whatever place it is. India has resources to make similar kind of pitches of Eng or SA at home. Make it play it. BCCI has no planning. 

PRIVATIZE BCCI with MINIMUM influent from Gov. Gov should only intervience when maulavi's want to play cricket. oterh than that privatize BCCI is the option. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...