Rightarmfast Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 8 hours ago, Malcolm Merlyn said: AT Neither of them were hyped for pace. I was then a member of this hype brigade. But not even one lasted. Just what do you have against Atul Sharma? Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 8 Author Share Posted October 8 16 hours ago, Tillu said: Copied from Reddit. Mayank yesterday. 150 149 148 148 148 147 147 146 146 146 145 145 144 143 143 142 141 140 138 135 Slower Slower Slower ● So Mayank has bowled 21 non-slower balls ● 7 balls or 34% of them at 147 k to 150 k. ● 6 balls in the mid 140s. ● 5 balls in the early 140s. ● Just 2 balls in the 130s. 63% of non-slower balls above 144 k not bowling flat out. Not bad for someone playing his first game after 5 months coming back from injury. I will be worried only if he is unable to cross 152 k by his 3rd game. Mosher, Tillu, Suhaan and 3 others 1 5 Link to comment
Rightarmfast Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 49 minutes ago, express bowling said: 150 149 148 148 148 147 147 146 146 146 145 145 144 143 143 142 141 140 138 135 Slower Slower Slower ● So Mayank has bowled 21 non-slower balls ● 7 balls or 34% of them at 147 k to 150 k. ● 6 balls in the mid 140s. ● 5 balls in the early 140s. ● Just 2 balls in the 130s. 63% of non-slower balls above 144 k not bowling flat out. Not bad for someone playing his first game after 5 months coming back from injury. I will be worried only if he is unable to cross 152 k by his 3rd game. There is nothing to worry if he doesnt exceed 152 by 3rd or 4th/5th game. It would only mean he has been told to bowl within 150k's, and concentrate on length and line. As he has admitted to. Any bowler who bowls 13 deliveries above 144k's in a spell of 24 balls, hasn't lost any yard of pace. That's an unusually high number of quick balls by any standard. Link to comment
Ultimate_Game Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 11 hours ago, tapandrun said: yes should have rested Arshdeep and could have picked a new wkt-batter what is the point of Sanju and Jitesh ?? Both are 30 yo and not sure there is role or position for them. TM selectors even donot know here to play sanju and with this line-up even rinku is not getting much chances where are they thinking to play jitesh ??? They are again wasting time with wkt keepers or else they too are place holder for Kishan or pant Agree regarding Sanju. We already have so many top order options who're better than Samson - Jaiswal, Abhishek, Gill, Ruturaj etc. which team management is already bullish on. Adding Samson to the list doesn't make any sense. We need a wkt keeper who can bat lower down the order. Samson has shown he can't do that and fails when he bats there. IMO that's why Jitesh is in the mix. Out of all the wkt keeping options in the mix, he's the only one who has shown he can bat in the lower order. Every other keeper - Samson, Pant, Jurel - can't go from ball one and need time to settle in and are better suited to the top or middle order. Jitesh is sort of right handed Raina and can get you a 12 ball 25 or a 16 ball 30 batting at 6 or 7. TBH I would've ended the Samson experiment by now. Link to comment
Nikhil_cric Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 They should call up Abhishek Porel as WK/BAT if they want to rest Pant. Otherwise , no option but Sanju. Need4Speed 1 Link to comment
singhvivek141 Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 43 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said: They should call up Abhishek Porel as WK/BAT if they want to rest Pant. Otherwise , no option but Sanju. Abhishek Porel or Kumar Kushagra are the next-gen keepers. Not sure where is Dinesh Bana. Nikhil_cric 1 Link to comment
tapandrun Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 need new wkt -batter .all tested/played so far either are no good for the format or not the quality or v.limited Link to comment
Need4Speed Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 59 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said: Abhishek Porel or Kumar Kushagra are the next-gen keepers. Not sure where is Dinesh Bana. He was really good that Dinesh Bana...hopefully parents didnt force him into studies..still 19 Link to comment
Nikhil_cric Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 4 hours ago, singhvivek141 said: Abhishek Porel or Kumar Kushagra are the next-gen keepers. Not sure where is Dinesh Bana. Those guys don't have good domestic T20 records. They may have potential but Porel had a good season in the IPL as well. Should be the WK/BAT in Pant's absence. Decent ceiling as a hitter. Link to comment
tapandrun Posted October 8 Share Posted October 8 Just now, Nikhil_cric said: Those guys don't have good domestic T20 records. They may have potential but Porel had a good season in the IPL as well. Should be the WK/BAT in Pant's absence. Decent ceiling as a hitter. pant does not cut-out to be t20 batter, already played 60+ games with sr ~125 Ultimate_Game 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 8 Author Share Posted October 8 (edited) Want to see both Mayank and Harshit play today. Edited October 9 by express bowling Mosher, SandeepMotta, singhvivek141 and 4 others 1 6 Link to comment
Need4Speed Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 5 hours ago, express bowling said: Want you see both Mayank and Harshit playing today. if Harshit manages to bowl well..then he must work on his batting too..coz then he is going to come to bat at 8..and make our bowling look like this in SENA tests I mean..assuming these young bowlers stay fit and perform per expectations..its going to be deadly combination.. 7- Good spinner bat 8-Harshit 9-Shami\Umran 10-Boom 11-Mayank express bowling 1 Link to comment
Ultimate_Game Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 4 minutes ago, Need4Speed said: if Harshit manages to bowl well..then he must work on his batting too..coz then he is going to come to bat at 8..and make our bowling look like this in SENA tests I mean..assuming these young bowlers stay fit and perform per expectations..its going to be deadly combination.. 7- Good spinner bat 8-Harshit 9-Shami\Umran 10-Boom 11-Mayank If we're playing 4 fast bowlers, I would replace one of the regular pacers with an all-rounder such as Nitish Reddy. Gives us greater depth with Harshit at 9 as you don't need 4 specialist pacers. One of them can be an all-rounder. When you add a spin based all-rounder (e.g., Jadeja), you get 5 bowling options with batting depth till 8 or 9. This will allow us to be competitive everywhere and not just in sub-continent. tweaker 1 Link to comment
Rightarmfast Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 3 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said: If we're playing 4 fast bowlers, I would replace one of the regular pacers with an all-rounder such as Nitish Reddy. Gives us greater depth with Harshit at 9 as you don't need 4 specialist pacers. One of them can be an all-rounder. When you add a spin based all-rounder (e.g., Jadeja), you get 5 bowling options with batting depth till 8 or 9. This will allow us to be competitive everywhere and not just in sub-continent. Ye to bahot kar chuke bhai. Zindagi bhar to yehi dekhta aa raha hoo. Maza to tab aaega jab batsmen choose honge unke bowling skills pe. But anyway, why do you need a ' neither batsman, nor bowler' kind of player when you have bowlers who can scare the opposition away? Whats the worst that can happen? India will lose? Will that be of any importance? I dont think so. express bowling and Mosher 2 Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 9 Author Share Posted October 9 3 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said: If we're playing 4 fast bowlers, I would replace one of the regular pacers with an all-rounder such as Nitish Reddy. Gives us greater depth with Harshit at 9 as you don't need 4 specialist pacers. One of them can be an all-rounder. When you add a spin based all-rounder (e.g., Jadeja), you get 5 bowling options with batting depth till 8 or 9. This will allow us to be competitive everywhere and not just in sub-continent. At No.8 we need a proper bowler who can hit big too. As of today, Nitish is neither a consistent big hitter nor a proper bowler. Harshit is ideal for this role. Mosher, Need4Speed and Rightarmfast 3 Link to comment
JaFanatic Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 6 minutes ago, express bowling said: At No.8 we need a proper bowler who can hit big too. As of today, Nitish is neither a consistent big hitter nor a proper bowler. Harshit is ideal for this role. Isn't Akashdeep better suited for this role? Nothing against Harshit though Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 9 Author Share Posted October 9 24 minutes ago, JaFanatic said: Isn't Akashdeep better suited for this role? Nothing against Harshit though Harshit is a better batsman. Mosher and JaFanatic 1 1 Link to comment
rkt.india Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 Mayank's strength is bowling 150-156 kph, not 145-150 wale to bht hain. He will be just one more. I would like that pacs back today. Kotla is much more pacy and bouncy wicket now. Rightarmfast, express bowling, Mosher and 4 others 1 6 Link to comment
singhvivek141 Posted October 9 Share Posted October 9 (edited) 59 minutes ago, JaFanatic said: Isn't Akashdeep better suited for this role? Nothing against Harshit though Akashdeep doesn't have a defensive game. Harshit beats him there. Edited October 9 by singhvivek141 JaFanatic 1 Link to comment
express bowling Posted October 9 Author Share Posted October 9 46 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Mayank's strength is bowling 150-156 kph, not 145-150 wale to bht hain. He will be just one more. I agree. 150 to 157 k with accuracy and bounce is what made Mayank special. But he needs to run in better than last match. Mosher and tapandrun 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now