MAYANK YADAV .... EXPRESS and bouncy Indian pacer who is accurate too

[express bowling]

16 hours ago, Tillu said:

Copied from Reddit.

 

Mayank yesterday.

 

 

 

150

149

148

148

148

147

147

 

146

146

146

145

145

144

 

143

143

142

141

140

 

138

135

 

Slower

Slower

Slower 

 

● So Mayank has bowled 21 non-slower balls

● 7 balls or 34% of them at 147 k to 150 k.

● 6 balls in the mid 140s.

● 5 balls in the early 140s.

● Just 2 balls in the 130s.

 

 

 

63% of non-slower balls above 144 k not bowling flat out.  Not bad for someone playing his first game after 5 months coming back from injury. 

 

I will be worried only if he is unable to cross 152 k by his 3rd game. 

 

 

 

[Rightarmfast]

49 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

 

150

149

148

148

148

147

147

 

146

146

146

145

145

144

 

143

143

142

141

140

 

138

135

 

Slower

Slower

Slower 

 

● So Mayank has bowled 21 non-slower balls

● 7 balls or 34% of them at 147 k to 150 k.

● 6 balls in the mid 140s.

● 5 balls in the early 140s.

● Just 2 balls in the 130s.

 

 

 

63% of non-slower balls above 144 k not bowling flat out.  Not bad for someone playing his first game after 5 months coming back from injury. 

 

I will be worried only if he is unable to cross 152 k by his 3rd game. 

 

 

 

There is nothing to worry if he doesnt exceed 152 by 3rd or 4th/5th game. It would only mean he has been told to bowl within 150k's, and concentrate on length and line. As he has admitted to. 

Any bowler who bowls 13 deliveries above 144k's in a spell of 24 balls, hasn't lost any yard of pace. That's an unusually high number of quick balls by any standard.

[Ultimate_Game]

11 hours ago, tapandrun said:

yes should have rested Arshdeep and could have picked a new wkt-batter what is the point of Sanju and Jitesh ??

Both are 30 yo and not sure there is role or position for them. TM selectors even donot know here to play sanju and with this line-up even rinku is not getting much chances where are they thinking to play jitesh ??? They are again wasting time with wkt keepers or else they too are place holder for Kishan or pant

 

Agree regarding Sanju. We already have so many top order options who're better than Samson - Jaiswal, Abhishek, Gill, Ruturaj etc. which team management is already bullish on. Adding Samson to the list doesn't make any sense. We need a wkt keeper who can bat lower down the order. Samson has shown he can't do that and fails when he bats there. IMO that's why Jitesh is in the mix.

 

Out of all the wkt keeping options in the mix, he's the only one who has shown he can bat in the lower order. Every other keeper - Samson, Pant, Jurel - can't go from ball one and need time to settle in and are better suited to the top or middle order. Jitesh is sort of right handed Raina and can get you a 12 ball 25 or a 16 ball 30 batting at 6 or 7. TBH I would've ended the Samson experiment by now.

[Nikhil_cric]

They should call up Abhishek Porel as WK/BAT if they want to rest Pant. 

 

Otherwise , no option but Sanju. 

[singhvivek141]

43 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

They should call up Abhishek Porel as WK/BAT if they want to rest Pant. 

 

Otherwise , no option but Sanju. 

Abhishek Porel or Kumar Kushagra are the next-gen keepers. Not sure where is Dinesh Bana.
 

[tapandrun]

need new wkt -batter .all tested/played so far either are no good for the format or not the quality or v.limited

[Need4Speed]

59 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Abhishek Porel or Kumar Kushagra are the next-gen keepers. Not sure where is Dinesh Bana.
 

He was really good that Dinesh Bana...hopefully parents didnt force him into studies..still 19

[Nikhil_cric]

4 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

Abhishek Porel or Kumar Kushagra are the next-gen keepers. Not sure where is Dinesh Bana.
 

Those guys don't have  good domestic T20 records. They may have potential but Porel had a good season in the IPL as well. 

 

Should be the  WK/BAT in Pant's absence.

 

Decent ceiling as a hitter.

 

 

[tapandrun]

Just now, Nikhil_cric said:

Those guys don't have  good domestic T20 records. They may have potential but Porel had a good season in the IPL as well. 

 

Should be the  WK/BAT in Pant's absence.

 

Decent ceiling as a hitter.

 

 

pant does not cut-out to be t20 batter, already played 60+ games with sr ~125

[express bowling]

Want to see both Mayank and Harshit play today. 

Edited October 9, 2024 by express bowling

[Need4Speed]

5 hours ago, express bowling said:

Want you see both Mayank and Harshit playing today. 

if Harshit manages to bowl well..then he must work on his batting too..coz then he is going to come to bat at 8..and make our bowling look like this in SENA tests I mean..assuming these young bowlers stay fit and perform per expectations..its going to be deadly combination..

 

7- Good spinner bat

8-Harshit

9-Shami\Umran

10-Boom

11-Mayank

 

[Ultimate_Game]

4 minutes ago, Need4Speed said:

if Harshit manages to bowl well..then he must work on his batting too..coz then he is going to come to bat at 8..and make our bowling look like this in SENA tests I mean..assuming these young bowlers stay fit and perform per expectations..its going to be deadly combination..

 

7- Good spinner bat

8-Harshit

9-Shami\Umran

10-Boom

11-Mayank

 

 

If we're playing 4 fast bowlers, I would replace one of the regular pacers with an all-rounder such as Nitish Reddy. Gives us greater depth with Harshit at 9 as you don't need 4 specialist pacers. One of them can be an all-rounder. When you add a spin based all-rounder (e.g., Jadeja), you get 5 bowling options with batting depth till 8 or 9. This will allow us to be competitive everywhere and not just in sub-continent.

[Rightarmfast]

3 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

If we're playing 4 fast bowlers, I would replace one of the regular pacers with an all-rounder such as Nitish Reddy. Gives us greater depth with Harshit at 9 as you don't need 4 specialist pacers. One of them can be an all-rounder. When you add a spin based all-rounder (e.g., Jadeja), you get 5 bowling options with batting depth till 8 or 9. This will allow us to be competitive everywhere and not just in sub-continent.

Ye to bahot kar chuke bhai. Zindagi bhar to yehi dekhta aa raha hoo. Maza to tab aaega jab batsmen choose honge unke bowling skills pe. 

But anyway, why do you need a ' neither batsman, nor bowler' kind of player when you have bowlers who can scare the opposition away? Whats the worst that can happen? India will lose? Will that be of any importance? I dont think so. 

[express bowling]

3 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

If we're playing 4 fast bowlers, I would replace one of the regular pacers with an all-rounder such as Nitish Reddy. Gives us greater depth with Harshit at 9 as you don't need 4 specialist pacers. One of them can be an all-rounder. When you add a spin based all-rounder (e.g., Jadeja), you get 5 bowling options with batting depth till 8 or 9. This will allow us to be competitive everywhere and not just in sub-continent.

 

At No.8 we need a proper bowler who can hit big too. 

 

As of today, Nitish is neither a consistent big hitter nor a proper bowler. 

 

Harshit is ideal for this role.

[JaFanatic]

6 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

At No.8 we need a proper bowler who can hit big too. 

 

As of today, Nitish is neither a consistent big hitter nor a proper bowler. 

 

Harshit is ideal for this role.

Isn't Akashdeep better suited for this role? Nothing against Harshit though

[express bowling]

24 minutes ago, JaFanatic said:

Isn't Akashdeep better suited for this role? Nothing against Harshit though

 

Harshit is a better batsman. 

[rkt.india]

Mayank's strength is bowling 150-156 kph, not 145-150 wale to bht hain. He will be just one more. I would like that pacs back today. Kotla is much more pacy and bouncy wicket now.

[singhvivek141]

59 minutes ago, JaFanatic said:

Isn't Akashdeep better suited for this role? Nothing against Harshit though

Akashdeep doesn't have a defensive game. Harshit beats him there.
 

Edited October 9, 2024 by singhvivek141

[express bowling]

46 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Mayank's strength is bowling 150-156 kph, not 145-150 wale to bht hain. He will be just one more. 

 

I agree.

 

150 to 157 k with accuracy and bounce is what made Mayank special.

 

But he needs to run in better than last match. 

[Rightarmfast]

4 hours ago, rkt.india said:

Mayank's strength is bowling 150-156 kph, not 145-150 wale to bht hain. He will be just one more. I would like that pacs back today. Kotla is much more pacy and bouncy wicket now.

Kabhi kabhi RKT kaafi 'Sakeet' baatein karta hain.. I mean Sateek baatein

Sorry, pj tha...

 

Mayank 157-158 jayega.. 160 bhi chala jayega. and people should support him. Infact, a culture should be inculcated of healthy competition. Atleast between Umraan and Mayank. 

If we do not bloom them and blood them now, 2 saal ke baad Shami nahi rahega, and Bumrah will be older. 

Fir to Mukesh Mcgrath zindabad ho jaega.. Are you really looking forward to that?