Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

 

J&K.

 

I have went there couple of times...in Kashmir Valley I always have a feeling that the person with whom I am talking has a disconnect between his mind and his heart.

 

 

My experience with J&K was excellent. Stayed in both J&K , TN for good 3 years each.

 

TN people are within themselves, will purposely avoid speaking English and even Hindi and will always prefer their own over others.

Posted
1 hour ago, Lord said:

IAS officers can't be criticized 

 

 

Civil services should be abolished & recruitment should be like normal corporate job. Work your way up, this nonsensee that someone passing a theroatical exam can jump into the pratical world of governance is dumb & archaic! There should also be a prcedure to fire these employees just like in states, while not as easy as corprate firing, it isn't also as difficult as Indian civil service firing. 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, IndianRenegade said:

Civil services should be abolished & recruitment should be like normal corporate job. Work your way up, this nonsensee that someone passing a theroatical exam can jump into the pratical world of governance is dumb & archaic! There should also be a prcedure to fire these employees just like in states, while not as easy as corprate firing, it isn't also as difficult as Indian civil service firing. 

 

 

Who can abolish IAS?

Posted
5 hours ago, IndianRenegade said:

Civil services should be abolished & recruitment should be like normal corporate job. Work your way up, this nonsensee that someone passing a theroatical exam can jump into the pratical world of governance is dumb & archaic! There should also be a prcedure to fire these employees just like in states, while not as easy as corprate firing, it isn't also as difficult as Indian civil service firing. 

 

 

 

Its the entitlement these babus seem to have. Its just a job. 

Posted

 

5 hours ago, IndianRenegade said:

Civil services should be abolished & recruitment should be like normal corporate job. Work your way up, this nonsensee that someone passing a theroatical exam can jump into the pratical world of governance is dumb & archaic! There should also be a prcedure to fire these employees just like in states, while not as easy as corprate firing, it isn't also as difficult as Indian civil service firing. 

 

 

Indian elite, as a whole, respond disproportionately to direct personal criticism.  They are thin skinned.  

 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said:

Which must be systemically deconstructed.

Storm is coming to fix. The typhoon known as @Chaos is landing in delhi :bandit:

Edited by Chaos
Posted
1 hour ago, IndianRenegade said:

Which must be systemically deconstructed.

Surprisingly politicians are much better at this. They are quite thick skinned..

 

It is that "paapa ki paari" "rajaa betaa" IAS officers that cannot take criticism. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, kepler37b said:

Delhi needs you bruhh....Your storm can shoo away the smog...


one big breath delhi smog gone

Posted (edited)

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/27/mumbai-overtakes-beijing-to-become-asias-billionaire-capital-for-first-time.html

 

Isn't it a shame ? Even Colombo looks 1st world compared to most parts of Mumbai. If there was ever a glaring example of how corrupt local corporators are - this is it.

Top 10 cities with the most billionaires

Rank City Number of billionaires
1 New York 119
2 London 97
3 Mumbai 92
4 Beijing 91
5 Shanghai 87
6 Shenzhen 84
7 Hong Kong 65
8 Moscow 59
9 New Delhi 57
10 San Francisco 52
Edited by rangeelaraja
Posted (edited)

We will never get quality cities with current state of social values. Accept and move on. The issue is aam aadmi. Not the neta or baabu. Kuch jyaada kahungaa tho vivaad ho jaayegaa

 

 

Edited by kepler37b
Posted

The number of billionaires do not necessarily change the status of a city or country unless the implication is that the billionaires should be using their “personal” resources to improve the entire infrastructure. 

Posted
32 minutes ago, zen said:

The number of billionaires do not necessarily change the status of a city or country unless the implication is that the billionaires should be using their “personal” resources to improve the entire infrastructure. 

A high concentration of billionaires logically implies that core infrastructure like roads should be good, not because billionaires are expected to fix them using their own personal wealth  but because their presence signals massive economic surplus, high tax capacity, and sustained public revenue. When extreme private wealth exists at scale, the state has both the means and the justification to deliver world-class infrastructure. If roads remain poor despite that wealth, it exposes a governance and allocation failure - in this case the utter corruption of BMC. 
 

BMC is one of Asias richest municipal boards. 

×
×
  • Create New...