Lone Wolf Posted November 9 Share Posted November 9 1 hour ago, randomGuy said: Is the English translation correct @coffee_rules. Pls help. You voted for this? @Lone Wolf Yep I voted for the end of all this.... But Bhaijaan Jamat Party sitting at centre had other ideas & has empowered Waqf to do whatever it wants Lord, coffee_rules and mishra 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishra Posted November 10 Share Posted November 10 20 hours ago, Lone Wolf said: Yep I voted for the end of all this.... But Bhaijaan Jamat Party sitting at centre had other ideas & has empowered Waqf to do whatever it wants If Muslim Waqf Board is there, We must have Sanatani waqf Board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted November 10 Share Posted November 10 (edited) 18 minutes ago, mishra said: If Muslim Waqf Board is there, We must have Sanatani waqf Board That will be called a Upper cast land holding association & OBC Priest King at the top will have none of it. There is no need of an alternative when ideally no such board should exist in the first place. But such arrangements makes the job of ruling party easier in creating further division and playing vote bank politics. So it's a necessary evil to have on their part. This is a non issue for BJP to take parliamentary route. Dumbocracy for a reason. Edited November 10 by Lone Wolf coffee_rules 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishra Posted November 10 Share Posted November 10 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: That will be called a Upper cast land holding association & OBC Priest King at the top will have none of it. There is no need of an alternative when ideally no such board should exist in the first place. But such arrangements makes the job of ruling party easier in creating further division and playing vote bank politics. So it's a necessary evil to have on their part. This is a non issue for BJP to take parliamentary route. Dumbocracy for a reason. My point is simple. We need equivalence in Rights vs Muslims. Hindu Santani Board should also have reservation System as per reservation manadated in Consitution. But Hindus can not have less Rights if we are using term "Secular" in constitution. Lets Contest every site legally in Court. Why just Kashi Mathura Ayodhya only. Start with Qutub Minar. Let GoI try defending Claims of Government of India against Claims that Hindu Sanatani Board will make. Edited November 10 by mishra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Wolf Posted November 10 Share Posted November 10 (edited) 39 minutes ago, mishra said: My point is simple. We need equivalence in Rights vs Muslims. Hindu Santani Board should also have reservation System as per reservation manadated in Consitution. But Hindus can not have less Rights if we are using term "Secular" in constitution. Lets Contest every site legally in Court. Why just Kashi Mathura Ayodhya only. Start with Qutub Minar. Let GoI try defending Claims of Government of India against Claims that Hindu Sanatani Board will make. You cannot just rewrite history... Qutub Minar is a symbol of Turkic conquest of North India a undeniable part of our History. Our future generations deserve to see this and not make those mistakes that our forefathers did. I don't think a Sanatani board is feasible at all in our society as it technically is much easier to abolish Waqf & end the stupidity coz bringing Sanatani act will anyways require a legislation & a huge ran*i Rona will follow. We will be back to square one in no time. It's easier to abolish than to bring new acts. Triple Talak, Art 370 are prime examples over CAA Ram Mandir or somewhere cold storage to the depths of hell NRC. Edited November 10 by Lone Wolf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted November 10 Share Posted November 10 34 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: You cannot just rewrite history... Qutub Minar is a symbol of Turkic conquest of North India a undeniable part of our History. Our future generations deserve to see this and not make those mistakes that our forefathers did. I don't think a Sanatani board is feasible at all in our society as it technically is much easier to abolish Waqf & end the stupidity coz bringing Sanatani act will anyways require a legislation & a huge ran*i Rona will follow. We will be back to square one in no time. It's easier to abolish than to bring new acts. Triple Talak, Art 370 are prime examples over CAA Ram Mandir or somewhere cold storage to the depths of hell NRC. Farmers fought back in Karnataka and Government issues a stay order on the Waqf claim. BJP should ideally repeal the 1995 waqf act through this JPC or amend it so much that waqf land is only subjected to first owned Muslim land and not inferred by some historical survey. Just have a cut off date of Aug 1947 and be done. It has become a everyday nuisance bouncers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts