Ab ki baar, Coalition Sarkar! Modi 3.0 Government Formation, performance thread

[Lord]

1 hour ago, Vicks57 said:

NEET scam: 1500 odd students are eligible for re-test.

 

6 toppers with 720/720 from same test center are eligible for retest. 

 

How the * does one get 140 marks as grace mark? 140 might be enough to pass the damn exam

 

This Modi 3.0 starts off with a huge scam and nothing is done on the NEET paper leaks.

 

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/six-perfect-neet-scorers-all-from-same-haryana-centre-lose-bragging-rights-101718305050713.html

 

Thanks to paper leaks, a student who has failed chemistry and physics has scored 705/720.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ndtv.com/education/student-who-aced-neet-failed-physics-chemistry-in-12th-marksheet-is-viral-5883906/amp/1

 

NEET should be scrapped and conducted again for all students. Not just 1500 students.

 

There is another thread for this. Created for yourself. Post it there and don't spam

[Vicks57]

4 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

There is another thread for this. Created for yourself. Post it there and don't spam

 

Got to post here where there is engagement. Not spamming 

[straighttalk]

On 6/12/2024 at 9:51 PM, rish said:

Exactly my point. he gave too many interviews.He needs to keep his aura intact.

At least he gave Interviews after learning that environment was not conducive this election..granted they were to GODI prestitutes...uske pehle once he got exposed by Karan..he stopped giving interviews....

Edited June 16, 2024 by straighttalk

[straighttalk]

On 6/14/2024 at 12:52 AM, ravishingravi said:

 

Press conferences to chosen journalists with pre decided questions isn't actually going to add any value. That's the history of independent India.  

But modi India was giving Interviews to hard ball godi media..bff crown on the top and all the beautiful gem that we got to hear ..wah wah..jis media ko it cell demonises that media caused upas downfall by exposing their corruption..and then BJP and Adani took control of most to insulate their corruption from people's eye but lack of inclusive development screwed up the shining India narrative

[coffee_rules]

Modi and Meloni trolling memers 

 

 

[Vicks57]

1 minute ago, coffee_rules said:

Modi and Meloni trolling memers 

 

 

 

More like Modi - Meloni friendship rather than India - Italy friendship

[Singh bling]

5 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

Modi and Meloni trolling memers 

 

 

Does he consider Italy as friend? Bashing Sonia because of Italian  was his favorite past time

[coffee_rules]

2 hours ago, Singh bling said:

Does he consider Italy as friend? Bashing Sonia because of Italian  was his favorite past time

You take this way too seriously. That’s just lip service. Sonia has called Modi  - Maut La saudagar and what not despite SC giving him a clean-chit for Godhra. Whole of India resemts her rule from 04-14 by proxy having a puppet PM and involved in multiple scams 

Edited June 16, 2024 by coffee_rules

[Singh bling]

2 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

You take this way too seriously. That’s just lip service. Sonia has called Modi  - Maut La saudagar and what not despite SC giving him a clean-chit for Godhra. Whole of India resemts her rule from 04-14 by proxy having a puppet PM and involved in multiple scams 

BJP attacking Sonia was way before she said anything. When I got interested in politics in teens My father told me that BJP started chanting slogans Rome raj nahi ram raj. At that she was not even in politics. Congressi were felling at feet to get into politics. 

 

BTW Sonia manmohan rule had much better growth rate than Indira or Rajiv's rule. 

Edited June 16, 2024 by Singh bling

[G_B_]

Lol wut?

 

Does italy have a non Italian (not born in italy) being head of a major political party?

 

 

Singh Bling should take a look at Meloni's policies....

 

 

[randomGuy]

2 hours ago, Singh bling said:

BJP attacking Sonia was way before she said anything. When I got interested in politics in teens My father told me that BJP started chanting slogans Rome raj nahi ram raj. At that she was not even in politics. Congressi were felling at feet to get into politics. 

 

BTW Sonia manmohan rule had much better growth rate than Indira or Rajiv's rule. 

Higher Inflation and higher corruption also.

[Singh bling]

1 hour ago, randomGuy said:

Higher Inflation and higher corruption also.

Inflation was because of international oil prices and corruption is not prooved . BTW IF UPA was corrupt how come taking those leader is not supporting corruption. 

 

Hear from BJP's one of biggest supporter

 

 

 

 

 

[G_B_]

The higher growth you speak of was on the backs of reforms enacted by Rao and Abv. One is congress and other is the bjp. We all know how Rao was treated by Congress.

 

Unfortunately indians have a tendency to punish reformers. Rao was felled by Mandal politics and looks like Modi suffered a backlash as well in 2024.

 

Name one major economic bill/reform like GST the cong gov passed from 2004 to 2014? I can name welfare schemes like Mnegra. 

 

Forget reform. Air India was privatised  by Modi gov. Abv started the sell off, of many state entities. 

 

Not saying welfare schemes are not important. But it's very easy saying higher growth when your term happened to be just after more than a decade of reform.

 

Once the party was over in 2008, the money for the welfare schemes dried up around 2011/2012 onwards. India became a fragile 5 economic nation in 2013...

 

Sonia gandhi has welfare policies. Not economic policies. 

[mishra]

12 hours ago, G_B_ said:

The higher growth you speak of was on the backs of reforms enacted by Rao and Abv. One is congress and other is the bjp. We all know how Rao was treated by Congress.

 

Unfortunately indians have a tendency to punish reformers. Rao was felled by Mandal politics and looks like Modi suffered a backlash as well in 2024.

 

Name one major economic bill/reform like GST the cong gov passed from 2004 to 2014? I can name welfare schemes like Mnegra. 

 

Forget reform. Air India was privatised  by Modi gov. Abv started the sell off, of many state entities. 

 

Not saying welfare schemes are not important. But it's very easy saying higher growth when your term happened to be just after more than a decade of reform.

 

Once the party was over in 2008, the money for the welfare schemes dried up around 2011/2012 onwards. India became a fragile 5 economic nation in 2013...

 

Sonia gandhi has welfare policies. Not economic policies. 

When Rahul and opposition leaders are saying that they can give Rs 1 lakh to women and unemployed, they know that GoI can afford it.

 

People are not looking at why GoI was unable to afford it before 2014. Answer is because government and India has worked hard and smartly,  day and Night since 2014 to reach that level.

 

TBH, Welfare is good and indeed needed for India. But most welfare schemes (specially costly ones) are going to a voter which is communal (Its communal globally) and can not live with any other religion be in West or East. That communities ideology can only create SUdan, Pakistan, Afghanistan. Democracy does not mean equality. It only means majoritarianism and mobocracy to them on Communal lines. Secularism is means for them to practice and protect Jihadist/conversion nature.

 

Opposition is simply coming up with policicies which is for their vote bank. BJP should do exactly same.

[G_B_]

That I agree.

 

This sabka saath simply does not work.

 

Better targeted policies the need of the hour.

 

Forget economic reform. India is in strong fiscal position post covid. Use that to go heads in on targeted welfare schemes.

 

Else you will make tough calls and welfare queen's like sonia will pocket dividends. 

 

 

 

 

[coffee_rules]

Gunde mawaaliwali dhamki with 99 seats. This is a threat to democracy. I don’t think there will be any debate in the parliament. Gaaliwali bai ka  aukat dekho 

 

 

[mishra]

On 6/16/2024 at 3:07 PM, Singh bling said:

 

BTW Sonia manmohan rule had much better growth rate than Indira or Rajiv's rule. 

Growth rate was in cruise control mode on back of Narsimha MMS policies. Corruption was only contribution of Congress under Sonia rule. When global economy tanked, Indis showed. 0 resilience and Mms was shown way out by voters

Edited June 18, 2024 by mishra

[mishra]

43 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Gunde mawaaliwali dhamki with 99 seats. This is a threat to democracy. I don’t think there will be any debate in the parliament. Gaaliwali bai ka  aukat dekho 

 

 

But what will Rahulji speak? Less he speaks, better its for Common ngress

[Chaos]

Ok i am here now @coffee_ruleslets see what i can do in this thread 

[mishra]

https://time.com/6985284/india-modi-reelection-significance/

 

Kugleman argues Modi 3.0 could pottentially transition of India  from middle Power to a Great Power.

 

I am not so sure about it.

 

Quote

Some time ago, India achieved the status of a middle power: a country with a deep global footprint and heavy strategic importance, but not strong enough to ascend to the upper echelon of world powers. The reelection of Prime Minister Narendra Modi positions India to begin a transition from a middle to a major power. But that shift won’t be easy.

Modi will begin his third term on June 8 with a smaller mandate, and he will need to rely on coalition partners, who agreed to back him on Wednesday, to govern. But less political space won’t have a major impact on foreign policy, because there’s broad multipartisan support for Modi’s longstanding priority of deepening India’s role—and power—on the global stage.

 

India has truly come into its own as a top international actor. It’s the world’s most populous country. It has the fifth-largest economy (growing at one of the world’s fastest rates). It boasts one of the most rapidly expanding tech sectors. And, following its lunar landing last year, it’s now a formal space power.

Modi has plenty of motivations to leverage these achievements and accelerate India’s climb up the world’s power hierarchy. He has long prioritized strengthening India’s role in the world. The election manifesto of his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 2014, the year he first became premier, vowed to build “a strong, self-reliant, self-confident India, regaining its rightful place in the comity of nations.”

 

Modi’s signature ideology, Hindu nationalism, is about making India stronger abroad, not just at home. Modi also views Hindu nationalism as a soft power tool; he promises to institute a program to highlight Lord Ram’s legacy abroad.

Modi has already done much to advance India’s global rise. He’s gained it membership in an array of global forums, from a new quad arrangement with the U.S., the UAE, and Israel to the prestigious Missile Technology Control Regime. Modi solidified India’s status as a net security provider, increasing arms sales to Indo-Pacific partners and projecting naval power in the Middle East to protect and assist ships targeted by missiles and piracy.

 

 

To the world, expanding Indian global power in a third Modi term presents opportunities and obstacles alike. Washington and like-minded allies could have an increasingly formidable partner to counter China. The Global South, the causes of which Modi has increasingly sought to champion, will have a powerful advocate. For capital-rich companies and countries, massive Indian consumer markets will beckon. Last month, external affairs minister S Jaishankar described his boss as a leader with “networking, standing, and respect.” He’s not wrong: most governments are keen to engage with Modi’s India.

But India’s growing global clout could raise some red flags. New Delhi’s embrace of multipolarity, through efforts to empower the Global South and strengthen multilateral organizations (including those it belongs to that counter the West), risks diluting U.S. power. India’s growing power also brings into sharper relief a fundamental conundrum for the West: How to square the strategic imperatives of partnership with an accelerating Indian illiberalism that fuels transnational repression—including some allegedly carried out on Western soil. But none of this will reverse India’s deepening security relations with Washington—a concern for Beijing and Moscow.

Admittedly, this may be putting the cart before the horse. India’s path to great powerdom, while possible under Modi, is not inevitable. To get there, he’ll need to make extensive course corrections.

 

One is hardwiring India’s economy for longer term stability and sustainability. Youth unemployment ranges from 44 to 54% for those in their 20s—staggering figures in a country where half the population is under 30. India needs more jobs and more skilled workers to accommodate fast-growing sectors and truly transform its economy into a global juggernaut.

India must also get a handle on its China challenge. It’s struggled mightily to deter its main strategic competitor. Chinese forces periodically stage border incursions and have built villages and roads on land India claims as its own. China is rapidly developing the capacity to project power in the Indian Ocean—from its western reaches, home to China’s only overseas military base, to areas to the east near the Andaman Sea, where India has territorial assets. An aspiring great power can’t afford to be bogged down by its biggest rival so close to home.

Furthermore, India needs institutional fixes, like steps to accelerate the implementation of defense reforms and to increase the size of its diplomatic corps.

Another big challenge is the world itself. It’s undergoing severe churn and fraught with furious geopolitical competition.

India has traditionally navigated great power rivalry by doubling down on its core foreign policy principle of strategic autonomy, balancing ties with competing powers and avoiding alliances to maximize flexibility. But if current trends hold, and geopolitical competition and instability keep intensifying, Modi may find himself under growing pressure to get off the fence.

 

Still, he’s passed two tough recent tests. New Delhi has maintained close ties with Moscow, its longtime partner, since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which India has declined to condemn, while managing to keep relations warm with the U.S. Meanwhile, it’s backing Israel’s war in Gaza, justifying it as a necessary counterterrorism move, even as its strong ties with the Palestinians and Arab capitals remain intact.

From this balancing act, India derives a unique form of global influence: It defies the polarization of power politics, straddling competing camps and positioning itself as a bridge and potential mediator.

Modi pledges to make India a Vishwaguru—a teacher and leader of the world. During his third term, India may strive to teach the world how a rising power can stay true to its founding foreign policy principle, even while staking out greater leadership in a changing world order.

 

Edited June 19, 2024 by mishra