Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Vicks57 said:

 

Where did you get this 'docile ugly desi chick with ugly white nationalist christoid'?

 

A weird tangent you are going on about my statement.

 

because its just as much true as your statement is.  That tangent doesnt matter, because your statement is silly. We dont care about what trump or vance or his wife really are as people, we care about what difference of republican govt vs democract govt means for us indians and hindus. The end. That is all we care about and should care about. 

rest is just kid stuff fluff with no real juice to override the bottomline : benefit/harm analysis for indians and hindus. 

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

"Should Trump be elected, India will have to confront some difficult negotiations over trade and immigration. Trump and his economic advisors have been clear that they will impose tariffs on countries they believe are engaging in unfair trade practices, especially China. But India, which enjoys a trade surplus, will also be subjected to some, resulting in retaliatory measures by New Delhi. Questions remain about the degree to which a second Trump administration can refashion trade policy without negative repercussions for the US economy - particularly for inflation. Moreover, Trump's advisors have pledged to stem immigration, especially by undocumented individuals, which may affect Indians too. Trump is also likely to impose restrictions on employment and student visas and cut funding for processing, contributing further to backlogs and delays. This will have implications for a variety of Indian businesses in the United States."

 

This is from the top think tank in India.

 

Source: https://orfamerica.org/newresearch/trump-harris-india

 

@Muloghonto @coffee_rules @ravishingravi look into the opinion of top think tank in India.

 

 

 

There are plenty of top thinktanks in India who also think Trump is better for India because Trump will stop breathing down India's neck over trade with Russia and take tougher stance on China. 

 

This isnt an Indian think tank, this is a murrican one. And a democrat one. Try to lie better. 

 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

 

ORF is the top think tank in India. It is non-profit and funded by Dhirubai Ambani.

 

ORF America is an overseas affiliate of the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), India’s premier non-government think tank.

 

Try doing some fact checking.

Dude their own website literally says they are US based non partisan group, with almost ALL advertised people being US citizens. Where the hell are you getting they are desi thinktank from ? 

 

ORF is a crowd sourced CIA project. thats why it shills almost always against the gormint with zero efficacy.

It stands in way of development in India by creating persistent legal roadblocks towards fast land acquisition and development. This is their headquarter site, not their affiliate site lol.

 

Saying top non govt thinktank is like saying top non accredited doctor. lol. Thinktanks only matter if they have established chops in advising in policy FOR a government. Where their policies have to some degree have a track record. NGO thinktanks is without any credibility because it doesnt have any semblance of accountability.

 

Edited by Muloghonto
Posted
Just now, Vicks57 said:

We are getting thrashed by USA. Looks like this will continue in the future.

 

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/india-silent-after-us-sanctions-19-indian-entities-for-russia-links/article68820129.ece

 

This is why INC refrained from close relations with USA.

 

Stop being a troll.

 

Around 400 entities or companies were sanctioned. Many from Nato nations. 19 is nothing.

 

The left wing media as usual trying to stir things up.

 

 

 

 

Posted
Just now, Vicks57 said:

 

Reporting facts is now considered "left wing media":facepalm:

19 out of 398 is basically india being thrashed by the usa?

 

There are firms from the eu turkey and swirtzerland on the list.

 

It is a total non issue.

Posted

I think India under Modi has anticipated that US India ties aren't going anywhere at present regardless of who comes .. Trump won't be Pro India and neither Harris.  We need Harris for immigration at least.

This decade India will get closer to China and Russia especially under Modi and BJP.

US was betting on regime change like 2014 for a reason & that didn't happen.

This is back to 2007 for them.

Posted
1 minute ago, Vicks57 said:

 

India has to sort out the border issues with China and align with them and Russia regardless of INC or BJP in power.

 

We are part of the global south.

 

US is the most morally bankrupt country in the world and its hegemony should be crushed.

 

Palestine must be liberated.


allooo thambiii :aha:

Posted
9 hours ago, Vicks57 said:

 

You are really backtracking now.

 

https://www.icwa.in/show_content.php?lang=1&level=1&ls_id=1586&lid=1555

 

Screenshot-2024-11-02-14-20-58-86-40deb4

 

I had rather trust a reputed think tank than an user in a cricket forum.

 

Once again, I am asking you to share articles from reputed think tank in India which support Trump over Harris.

 

 

 

good thing then, that what you are citing is not a reputed link. once again i am asking you to EXPLAIN to us why the potus who is openly said by both his side and the opposition to be pro Russia and anti-China is a worse deal for us indians than the one who is opposite. Hiding behind shady CIA funded orgs wont change that question, kiddo.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

 

good thing then, that what you are citing is not a reputed link. once again i am asking you to EXPLAIN to us why the potus who is openly said by both his side and the opposition to be pro Russia and anti-China is a worse deal for us indians than the one who is opposite. Hiding behind shady CIA funded orgs wont change that question, kiddo.

 


why explain to an bu almuni? @Vicks57 @zen

Posted
2 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

 

Now I understand why he is picked on.

And he must be 70+ and calls everyone kiddo, and talks about genitals a lot 

 

spacer.png

Posted
3 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

 

More like this guy. Matches the age.

 

43d4a9949fe8e98bc2c7c48e16991119.gif

 

 


hell naw even tho he is ugly af he was a bad ass which this alumni can dream off. Post what u did before :phehe:

Posted
27 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

 

No point in talking to you when constantly say orf is not a reputed think tank.

It isnt. You claiming it is, doesnt make it so. A random NGO with zero input in actual policy making is not a reputed think tank - reputed think tanks are those who've had policy influence in present or past governments. Presenting some rando quack group as reputed doesnt make it so but keep running from the simple point i raised. 


Get your NGO or maybe yourself can explain, how the hell is Trump bad news for India in international relations angle, when Trump **IS** far friendlier with Russia, a nation India is very friendly to and more hostile to China, which India is also hostile to, than the other candidate is. Like, this is not even a debatable claim, since BOTH Dems and Reps and Kamala team and Trump team agree that he has a hard-on for Putin and a hatred for China.

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

 

This guy with dementia will suit better 

 

joe-biden-presidential-debate.gif

 

 


but i was talking about ur alumni pic u posted before. Even tho i do agree he talks like biden :phehe:

Posted
10 minutes ago, Vicks57 said:

 

Source: https://www.indembassybern.gov.in/news_detail/?newsid=1279

 

All i have asked for is a article supporting Trump over Harris from any of the reputed thinktanks in India.

 

I am willing to entertain different opinions provided there is a reputed source.

 

You can dodge the question all you wish, but appeal to authority is not a valid argument when it comes to logic. Indian embassy saying OFR is reputed by global media doesnt matter, since it doesnt have any reputation from accountability. I asked for reputed sources that have had inputs in policy. past or present, doesnt matter. Show us a reputed think tank like Heritage foundation or CAP, who've had POLICY influence. You have not provided. 

Getting a bunch of people who have no input ever in forming policy doesnt qualify them for what they think and you are still dodging my question - which means you are not willing to entertain simple logic. 

×
×
  • Create New...